Los Angeles Times

Free speech and the NRA

-

The National Rifle Assn. deserves all the condemnati­on it has received and more for standing in the way of reasonable, lifesaving gun control efforts. Because of the gun group’s cynical hard-line policies and near-religious embrace of the 2nd Amendment, more and more Americans live at daily risk from gunfire, be it from a random shooter, from an intimate partner or by their own hands.

But the NRA is a legally constitute­d organizati­on with the same right to exist and go about its business as any other organizati­on (though society would be better off if the group’s adherents tore up their membership cards). So a recent decision by the Los Angeles City Council to compel contractor­s who do business with the city to divulge whether they also do business with the NRA is an objectiona­ble overreach. Worse yet, it may violate the companies’ 1st Amendment right to free speech.

This isn’t the City Council’s first step down this road. It enacted an ordinance last year requiring companies doing business with the city to disclose whether they have done work related to the federal barriers erected along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The idea then, as now, was to “name and shame” firms and contractor­s that have engaged in a legal activity that’s associated with something the City Council finds contemptib­le. Last year the target was President Trump’s cockamamie wall proposal. Now it’s the NRA’s political activities.

The city can and should pursue aggressive gun control policies. The mayor and council members can also speak out against the gun lobby’s policies. But it is not acceptable for government to punish people or businesses over lawful political expression­s with which the government disagrees. That is a bedrock tenet of civil liberties.

The council isn’t likely to harm the NRA as much as the contractor­s it would stigmatize for having connection­s with the group. And that’s a ludicrous goal. What benefit is served by, say, making an office supply store confess that it contracted to sell printer paper to the NRA before it can sell paper to the city of Los Angeles? This is a classic example of good intentions — curbing gun violence — leading to inane results.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States