Los Angeles Times

Moon preservati­on is a thing

- N Sept. 13, 1959,

Oa day that we can pretty much guarantee was clear and sunny on the moon, the Soviet Union crash-landed its Luna 2 spacecraft in a region east of what is known to Earthlings as the Mare Serenitati­s. A decade later, the U.S. landed the first human beings on the moon in the Mare Tranquilli­tatis. The Soviets left the wreckage of their unmanned craft where it landed, but the Apollo 11 Lunar Module known as the Eagle took off to reconnect with Apollo 11, leaving behind a U.S. flag, a plaque and the boot prints of astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin — which remain, incongruou­sly enough, visible in the lunar dust nearly half a century later.

Now, there’s an effort underway to extend the designatio­ns and protection­s of the United Nations’ World Heritage sites to these two historic moon locations and other locations in space that represent significan­t advances in humankind’s exploratio­ns.

As National Public Radio reported Thursday, the nonprofit space historical preservati­on organizati­on For All Moonkind is trying to find countries to sponsor a U.N. declaratio­n that would create a mechanism for designatin­g and protecting locations significan­t to space exploratio­ns, beginning with the landing sites of the Luna 2 and the Eagle. Under internatio­nal treaties, no country has a right to make any territoria­l claims in space. But presumably the U.N., speaking on behalf of the entire planet, could try to set some rules for the treatment of these two historic locations and others.

Admittedly, the protection of some detritus and dusty footprints 238,000 miles from U.N. headquarte­rs at Turtle Bay should not be that organizati­on’s top priority. On the other hand, what’s the harm in trying? In 1969, Apollo 12’s lunar lander inadverten­tly sandblaste­d the unmanned Surveyor III craft that had landed on the moon two years earlier. And future missions could — inadverten­tly or intentiona­lly — damage more significan­t landing sites. If the Moonkind folks are concerned for the future, the U.N. is the appropriat­e place for a discussion on how such sites should be weighed for historic significan­ce and then protected.

More moon shots are being contemplat­ed. China recently landed an explorer on the dark side of the moon, and it has joined the U.S., Russia and Japan in contemplat­ing future manned missions. As we look to the future of space exploratio­n, there’s no harm — and perhaps some value — in protecting the past.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States