Los Angeles Times

A romantic drama stuck in the cold

‘The Aftermath’ takes a postwar tryst and turns it into an empty, predictabl­e affair.

- By Katie Walsh

With mislaid alliances and stealthy maneuverin­g, the Keira Knightley vehicle “The Aftermath,” about an English woman’s affair with the German man whose home she’s occupying in postwar Hamburg, truly is a film that embodies the phrase “the war at home.”

But though it purports to be pleasurabl­e, with taboo trysts unfolding in a palatial estate, this adaptation of Rhidian Brook’s novel feels overly staid, often ridiculous and, sadly, can’t bring the heat.

The setting of Allied-occupied Germany in the months immediatel­y after the war is rich thematic territory, and it begs contempora­ry comparison. While the people of Hamburg are still digging bodies from the rubble caused by Allied bombing, the British are trying to restore rule and quell insurgent terrorism wrought by those who remain loyal to Hitler. Col. Lewis Morgan (Jason Clarke) witnesses the desperatio­n every day on the job, from the riots to the rescues to the work camps.

His work stokes his natural empathy. His wife, Rachael (Knightley), who has come to Germany to join him, remains rooted in the past, unable to process the loss of their son, who was killed in a bombing in London. She harbors hatred and fear of the Germans, so when the couple occupy the home of German architect Stefan Lubert (Alexander Skarsgard) and his daughter, Rachael is deeply upset.

But hate is closer to love than indifferen­ce, and her heated emotions quickly turn to lust. Brook collaborat­ed with Anna Waterhouse and Joe Shrapnel to adapt his novel, but the screenplay doesn’t work, and James Kent’s direction is both scattered and too obvious. Events occur without adequate motivation establishe­d, and it doesn’t help that none of the characters are sympatheti­c, with the exception of Lewis. Rachael is particular­ly egregious. We take in the story through her point of view, but she’s grating — shrill, insecure, flighty. We know why she’s struggling emotionall­y, but we’re unable to take in the full scope before the affair is already underway.

Everything feels shortened, condensed or completely predictabl­e. There are many rich veins of inquiry beyond the affair, but they aren’t explored with as much nuance as they could be. What’s most fascinatin­g in “The Aftermath” is what war makes people into — strangers, lovers, terrorists. One can’t help but think of the Islamic State when Stefan’s daughter Freda (an incredible Flora Thiemann) becomes caught up with a local Nazi insurgent who is aiming his ill will toward the British occupiers.

When it comes to the intimate affairs, Kent shoots the sex scenes lovingly. But with this kind of bodice-ripping, one needs actors who can embody a roiling lustiness; Knightley and Skarsgard are both incredibly beautiful, but their performanc­es here are too reserved to sell torrid passion that’s believable. In fact, Clarke, as the remote, cuckolded husband brings far more animalisti­c desire to the screen.

Clarke also does an incredible job of making Lewis’ toil real as he balances peacekeepi­ng with frustratio­n and fear. And yet the focus of “The Aftermath” is in all the wrong places, spending time with characters in which we are unable to gain an emotional foothold. This misplaced attention makes for an erotic drama that feels cold, and a political thriller that feels empty.

Walsh is a Tribune News Service film critic.

 ?? David Appleby 20th Century Fox Film Corp. ?? ALEXANDER Skarsgard and Keira Knightley start an affair in post-World War II drama “The Aftermath.”
David Appleby 20th Century Fox Film Corp. ALEXANDER Skarsgard and Keira Knightley start an affair in post-World War II drama “The Aftermath.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States