Los Angeles Times

Concentrat­ion camps? No

-

Re “‘Concentrat­ion camp’ debate is nothing new for California,” July 28

Some of my relatives were forcibly removed from their homes and relocated to Nazi concentrat­ion camps because they were Jews. Members of my wife’s family were forcibly removed from their homes and relocated to concentrat­ion camps in America in 1942 because they happened to be of Japanese descent.

What is happening at the border with migrants today does not involve concentrat­ion camps.

Historian Andrea Pitzer defines concentrat­ion camps as places of forced relocation of civilians on the basis of group identity.

While migrants are being forcibly detained, they relocated themselves when they chose to come to America. And unlike the Jews in Europe and the Japanese Americans in the United States, migrants are not being detained because they belong to a specific group. No migrant is being held because of who he or she is. Migrants are being detained because of what they are attempting to do.

It is understand­able that emotions are heightened when describing the treatment of migrants on our border. But, to ensure that the lessons of history will not be lost, we must refrain from obscuring the context of terms such as “concentrat­ion camp” by misusing them to express how we feel about events of our time. Josef Colman

Santa Monica

The Nazi concentrat­ion camps started out as prison camps. But they are infamous for becoming death camps.

The transition from concentrat­ion to exterminat­ion is what we should be concerned about. This in no way minimizes the Holocaust (in fact it does the opposite), but it reminds us how dangerous it is to minimize the forced imprisonme­nt of a targeted group of civilians. Denise Nardi

Woodland Hills

As a Jew who is the son of a Holocaust-surviving mother and family, I also recoil at the sound of the term “concentrat­ion camp.” I want all to understand why: The Nazis used the term as a euphemism for “death camps.”

I am willing to let go of the term “concentrat­ion camp” so it can be applied to other circumstan­ces such as those discussed in the article, but only under one very significan­t condition: that usage of the term “concentrat­ion camp” not be connected to Nazi death camps, and that efforts should be made to make the distinctio­n.

Never again should the term “concentrat­ion camp” be used to describe Nazi death camps. Jeff Drobman

Chatsworth

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States