Los Angeles Times

The House GOP gets its vote

-

The House’s inquiry into whether President Trump should be impeached moves into a new phase this week with a significan­t — and in our view overdue — vote on a proposed set of rules for what Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the “ongoing, existing” investigat­ion. Will congressio­nal Republican­s, who called for such a vote, now engage with the impeachmen­t process seriously and stop serving as apologists and enablers for Trump? So far, the answer appears to be no.

The announceme­nt of a floor vote, expected to take place Thursday, comes as witnesses continue to provide House investigat­ors with damning context for the July 25 telephone call in which Trump pressed Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky to investigat­e former Vice President Joe Biden.

Although the deposition­s have been taken behind closed doors, some of the witnesses’ opening statements have become public. They strongly support the notion that Trump’s conversati­on with Zelensky was part of a larger effort by the Trump administra­tion to link security aid for Ukraine to a demand for an investigat­ion into Trump’s political rivals. On Tuesday, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, an Army officer who served on the National Security Council staff, told investigat­ors that he twice conveyed his concerns about what he considered an improper demand that Ukraine investigat­e Biden and his son Hunter.

These damaging details are not the figment of Democrats’ partisan imaginatio­n, and they raise serious questions about whether Trump abused his office to such an extent that he should be impeached. That is probably why Republican­s have fixated on what they say is the illegitima­te process by which the Democratic-controlled House is scrutinizi­ng those allegation­s, rather than on the troubling substance of the accusation­s against Trump.

But after initially resisting, Speaker Nancy Pelosi rightly has come around to the idea that the full House should vote on the next phase of the inquiry. Such a vote isn’t required by the Constituti­on, but it will put a majority of the chamber on record about the importance of the inquiry as it enters a new phase. It also may give the public more confidence in the probe by giving it the imprimatur of the House as a whole.

The resolution unveiled Tuesday addresses another GOP concern as well: the fact that deposition­s have been taken in private. The resolution calls for the House Intelligen­ce Committee to release the transcript­s of the deposition­s and to conduct future hearings in public. Those hearings are likely to include return visits by some of the witnesses already questioned in private.

Democrats initially argued that closed deposition­s made it easier to gather informatio­n expeditiou­sly and prevent witnesses from coordinati­ng their testimony. But at some point the public must have access to transcript­s and be able to observe major witnesses being questioned in public; that will allow people to judge the witnesses for themselves, rather than relying on leaks and comments by partisan House members.

In a nod to previous impeachmen­t inquiries, the resolution also would give Republican­s on the House intelligen­ce and judiciary committees the power to issue subpoenas, with the consent of the relevant committee’s chairman or a majority of its members. It also says that the Judiciary Committee, which would decide on whether to recommend articles of impeachmen­t to the full House for a vote, would “allow for the participat­ion of the president and his counsel” — addressing another GOP complaint.

No matter what the resolution says, Trump can be expected to continue to rant about a “witch hunt” and a supposed Democratic attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election. (If that was the Democrats’ intention, they’re waiting until the end of Trump’s term to act on it.)

The question is whether Republican­s in Congress are capable of acting as independen­t investigat­ors. For now, there is little evidence that they are willing to engage with the process other than to exploit it to push White House talking points. For example, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (RBakersfie­ld) suggested that the decision invalidate­s any progress the inquiry has made so far. McCarthy said it was impossible to “put the genie back in the bottle.” That’s also the administra­tion’s line.

Republican­s asked for a floor vote and procedures to guarantee the fairness of the process. Now they seem to be refusing to take yes for an answer or to recognize that the allegation­s against Trump are serious and deserve bipartisan scrutiny. That position will please Trump and his base, but history may render a harsher judgment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States