Los Angeles Times

TESLA BATTERY FIRES BEING PROBED

Safety agency asks the company to turn over all documents that shed light on issues with Models S and X.

- By Russ Mitchell

Federal safety regulators have begun looking into Tesla battery fires. The probe covers all Model S and Model X vehicles manufactur­ed between 2012 and 2019 and sold in the United States.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion is casting a wide net in its action, which the agency does not technicall­y classify as an “investigat­ion” but rather as a “defect petition.” In a letter sent to Tesla’s legal department dated Oct. 24, the agency demands that Tesla produce all documents that relate to “highvoltag­e battery fires that are not related to collision or impact damage to the battery pack” in the Model S and Model X.

That includes documents from “all original written, printed, typed, recorded or graphic matter whatsoever … of every kind, nature and descriptio­n.” Included are papers, letters, memos, emails, charts, tables, appointmen­t books, diaries, travel reports, blueprints and more than 100 other sources of informatio­n.

The demand includes not only Tesla but also contractor­s, consultant­s and agencies involved with Models S and X battery issues.

The media have reported several incidents in which Tesla batteries appeared to spontaneou­sly burst into flames — sometimes while driving, other times while the vehicle was parked. If Tesla knows of other such fires that the media have not picked up on, NHTSA wants to know about them.

The Times attempted to reach Tesla’s media relations team by email and by phone Friday morning, but the company has not responded.

After a fire was reported in a parked Model S in Hong Kong in May, Tesla beamed

a software update to Model S and Model X cars that limited charging to 80% of capacity and, many owners have complained, decreased the car’s range.

The company said at the time that the update was issued out of an “abundance of caution” to “protect the battery and improve its longevity” but offered no detail on what the trouble was, and it has yet to address the issue publicly.

Another parked Model S burst into flames in Shanghai in June. Tesla said at the time that the fire involved a single battery module and was not a system defect. (A Model S battery pack is composed of 16 battery modules; together they contain about 7,000 high-energy battery cells that look similar to AA consumer batteries but larger.)

It’s the battery system that NHTSA is focused on, with emphasis on battery management software.

The battery limitation update has sparked a classactio­n lawsuit and a barrage of customer complaints.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims that the range for the Model S and Model X, which sell for around $100,000, is less than what buyers paid for, and that the vehicles’ resale value has been reduced. NHTSA said early last month it had received a petition from a lawyer representi­ng car owners asking the agency to investigat­e.

Malibu resident and Model S owner Robert Karpuk is not part of the lawsuit, but he’s upset with Tesla about the range reduction. “We have two Teslas; I think they’re the greatest cars ever,” he said. But, he said, he wants a “straight answer” from Tesla. “What is it about this update that specifical­ly affects my battery pack? They won’t tell me,” he said.

The Tesla Model 3, the company’s latest car, is not part of the NHTSA probe. Its battery system differs from that of the Models S and X.

It uses different battery cells, for example, and its liquid battery cooling system differs significan­tly from the Models S and X cooling design.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States