Los Angeles Times

Prop. 187’s targets have had their revenge

The ballot initiative fueled the basest fears of voters. But it also ignited an involved Latino electorate.

- Antonia Hernández is president and chief executive of the California Community Foundation. Alex Padilla serves as California secretary of state. By Antonia Hernández and Alex Padilla

Twenty-five years ago this week, by a 59% to 41% vote, California voters passed Propositio­n 187, which aimed to block undocument­ed immigrants from access to non-emergency health care, public education, and other services in the state. Propositio­n 187 was widely viewed as one of the harshest anti-immigrant measures ever to make it onto a U.S. ballot.

But despite their victory at the polls, the measure’s supporters didn’t triumph in the end. Propositio­n 187 was quickly blocked by the courts. Moveover, the movement that arose in opposition to the initiative didn’t simply recede after the election day defeat. Its participan­ts went on to transform grassroots organizing, civic engagement and political power in California. The initiative’s passage prompted immigrants and their families — who had long thought they could keep their heads down, do their work, take care of their loved ones and ultimately live out their American dream — to become civically engaged.

Each of us was deeply affected by Propositio­n 187.

One of us, Antonia, was a young civil rights attorney at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund when the initiative passed, and she came out of the experience determined to ensure that a law like this would never again pass in California.

The other, Alex, saw how the initiative’s passage prompted his parents, like so many other Latino families, to apply for citizenshi­p after many years of living, working and paying taxes in the United States. They did so not only to protect themselves, but also so they could register and vote. Propositio­n 187 is a big part of the reason Alex went into public service.

We were not alone in having strong reactions to this misguided initiative. Ultimately, the fight and its aftermath energized a growing Latino population and decimated the state’s Republican Party, turning California into one of the bluest states in the country.

The Latino electorate is often referred to as a “sleeping giant.” Propositio­n 187 was the alarm that launched its awakening in our state. The ballot box has been one of the most direct ways in which communitie­s targeted by Propositio­n 187 have exercised their voice and political power since that time. According to Census Current Population Survey data, in 1994 there were 1.4 million Latinos registered to vote in California; today there are more than 4 million.

Since 1996, the number of Latinos serving in the state Legislatur­e has more than doubled, from 14 back then to 29 today. In 1996, there were no Latino statewide officehold­ers; there are five. In 1996, the U.S. House of Representa­tives had four Latino members from California; there are now 14.

Latinos have also played a greater role in legislativ­e leadership, with five Assembly speakers since 1996. And in 2014, a Latino was elected state Senate president pro tempore. This election proved timely, as he led the charge on SB 54 in 2017, which declared California a “sanctuary state.”

Other significan­t legislativ­e measures in which Latino legislator­s have taken the lead include AB 540, the California Dream Act, which extended in-state tuition to undocument­ed students and SB 60, which allows undocument­ed immigrants to apply for driver’s licenses or state IDs.

The proponents of Propositio­n 187 attempted to dictate who deserved to be a California­n and share in the California Dream. In response, people harnessed their emotions and collective strength to forever change the trajectory of our state. California went from a state apprehensi­ve about immigratio­n to a prosperous place in which most residents embrace diversity. The state has also enacted the nation’s most inclusive set of policies and rights for immigrants.

This movement was driven by Latinos, but it was more than a Latino movement. Change came as a result of Latinos working in coalition with leaders and advocates of all races and ethnicitie­s, including African American and Asian Pacific Islander communitie­s. Together, we have grown from community coalitions into governing coalitions that have led on criminal justice, immigrant rights, economic and environmen­tal justice and other policy issues.

There are lessons to be learned from this journey. Twenty-five years ago, California fell victim to fears stemming from economic insecurity. Some of the state’s political leaders at the time capitalize­d on that fear by scapegoati­ng immigrants — much as we are seeing today nationally. We know that the discrimina­tory nativist rhetoric we’re hearing now is not new. But because we have experience­d it before, we know how to overcome it.

When immigrants become citizens, their voices soar. When we participat­e in the census, we refuse to be erased. And when we vote, we become powerful.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States