Los Angeles Times

ANGELS, CITY REACH DEAL

Firm affiliated with Moreno will buy the stadium and parking lots for $325 million.

- By Bill Shaikin

The Angels have bound themselves to the city of Anaheim longer than they have bound themselves to Mike Trout.

For more than half a century, the Angels have played in a stadium surrounded by acres of parking lots. For the first time, the Angels will have the chance to turn those parking lots into an attraction of their own.

The Angels and the city agreed Wednesday on a deal under which SRB Management, a company affiliated with Angels owner Arte Moreno, would buy Angel Stadium and the surroundin­g property for $325 million. The city would not contribute to the cost of renovating the stadium or building one, and the Angels would decide whether to upgrade or replace the current stadium.

Under the deal, the Angels are committed to playing in Anaheim through 2050, with options that could keep them there through 2065. The Angels were faced with a Dec. 31 deadline to opt out of their stadium lease or remain bound to it through 2029.

Trout, widely considered the best player in baseball, is committed to the Angels through 2030. The Angels last year signed him to a contract worth $426.5 million, a record for an athlete in any North American team sport.

The Anaheim City Council is expected to approve the deal Dec. 20. The Angels had opted out of their stadium lease last year, and Mayor Harry Sidhu made a new deal his priority.

“We appreciate the mayor’s leadership in working to keep the Angels here in Anaheim, which has been our home for over 50 years,” Moreno said. “Today is the first step in enabling us to invest in our future by building a winning team and delivering a high-quality fan experience.”

The Angels have hired HKS Architects, which has advised the Texas Rangers on their new ballpark and the Dodgers on their stadium renovation­s, to help envision options for redoing or replacing Angel Stadium. The agreement does not commit the Angels to any particular developmen­t on the 153-acre site.

The deal anticipate­s the city and team reaching a separate developmen­t agreement next year, including the possibilit­y of entertainm­ent, shops, restaurant­s, homes and hotels around the ballpark. The city said it would push for the inclusion of parks and affordable housing in the project and would rebate part of the purchase price to the Angels to facilitate those community benefits. The city did not say how it might do that or whether it would contribute to infrastruc­ture costs for the developmen­t.

The city released the deal points but not details of the agreement. The city must do so in advance of the Dec. 20 vote.

Angel Stadium, which opened in 1966, is the fourtholde­st ballpark in the major leagues. Boston’s Fenway Park dates to 1912, Chicago’s Wrigley Field to 1914, and Dodger Stadium to 1962.

Dodger Stadium is owned by the team, and ownership has invested more than $300 million into stadium renovation­s since 2012.

Angel Stadium is owned by the city of Anaheim, and the two parties have debated for years over how to renovate the stadium. The city also has debated how to develop the surroundin­g parking lots, but none of the celebrated proposals — an NFL stadium, a Westernthe­med village with a rodeo arena, and an indoor surfing and skiing complex — came to pass.

In 1996, the Walt Disney

Co. bought the Angels and paid $117 million to return what was then called Anaheim Stadium from a multipurpo­se facility — the stadium had been expanded to 65,000 seats to accommodat­e the Rams — to a comfortabl­e 45,000-seat ballpark. The city contribute­d $20 million, confident it would make all those millions back and more through a parking lot developmen­t called Sportstown.

“Sportstown is a slam dunk,” then-City manager Jim Ruth told The Times in 1997.

The city hired a developmen­t company. The developer failed to secure tenants and quit. The site remained vacant, and the city generated no property or sales taxes from what it considered prime real estate.

In 2013, Anaheim declined to pay the estimated $150 million for what both sides agreed were needed infrastruc­ture upgrades. The city asked Moreno to pick up the bill, and in return offered him the right to develop the parking lots and use the revenue to recoup his expenses. The deal collapsed after Tom Tait, then the mayor of Anaheim, said the Angels should pay more than the proposed $1 per year to lease the lots and should share developmen­t revenue with the city. The Angels negotiated for a new ballpark in nearby Tustin, but Moreno declined to pay the entire cost.

In 2018, two months before Tait was forced from office because of term limits, the Angels exercised their right to opt out of their Angel Stadium lease. That triggered a new negotiatio­n, led by the city’s new mayor, Sidhu.

In the months between the Angels opting out and the inaugurati­on of Sidhu, the city agreed to a new lease with the Ducks, securing the NHL team in Anaheim through 2048 and granting the team the right to develop the parking lots surroundin­g Honda Center.

City officials made clear they envisioned a vibrant urban village on both sides of the 57 Freeway, with a destinatio­n for playing, shopping, working and living anchored by Angel Stadium, Honda Center and the adjacent train station. The working term used by a city executive: L.A. Live on steroids.

In 2014, the city commission­ed an appraisal that valued the Angel Stadium property from $225 million to $325 million. The city got another appraisal this year.

In September, the appraiser reported a range of values from $225 million to $470 million if the Angels stayed, in part depending on how many parking spaces would be required and how many parking structures might be needed to replace land used for developmen­t. If the team left and the stadium were demolished, the land was valued at $375 million to $475 million.

On Tuesday, the day before the deal was announced, the appraiser reported a final range of values from $300 million to $320 million, based on “the results of the changes from the negotiatin­g process” between the city and the team. The appraiser said the final deal, with the Angels buying the entire property rather than leasing it, had not been one of the scenarios the city initially asked him to value.

The appraiser noted that the value could be affected in part by competing developmen­t at Honda Center and the “distinct probabilit­y” that the Ducks could complete their developmen­t before the Angels start theirs.

The Ducks are likely to unveil “a large-scale sports/ entertainm­ent oriented project that would include multi-family residentia­l uses in future years ... consistent with the theme and design and appeal of the Irvine Spectrum,” according to the appraisal report. The Ducks have not revealed their plans publicly.

The Angels were born as the Los Angeles Angels in 1961, and Moreno reclaimed that name for them in 2005. They played their inaugural season at Wrigley Field in Los Angeles and four seasons at Dodger Stadium, and their search for a home they could call their own led them to Long Beach and Anaheim.

Long Beach wanted its name on the team. Anaheim just wanted the team.

The Angels moved to Anaheim, playing as the California Angels under founding owner Gene Autry and the Anaheim Angels under Disney.

When Moreno opted out of the Angel Stadium lease last year, Long Beach again pursued the team, this time with the vision of a $1-billion waterfront ballpark. For the second time, the Angels have picked Anaheim over Long Beach.

They will remain the Los Angeles Angels.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States