India’s lockdown fuels questions and concerns
MUMBAI, India — Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a nationwide lockdown on Tuesday, ordering 1.3 billion people to stay in their homes for three weeks in the world’s biggest curfew aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus.
“If we don’t handle these 21 days well, then our country, your family, will go backward by 21 years,” Modi said in a nationally televised address.
The lockdown went into effect at midnight, shutting down flights, trains, schools, houses of worship and nearly all businesses nationwide in an effort to reduce transmission of the virus that has infected more than 400,000 people in nearly every country in the world.
India has counted slightly more than 500 infections, but epidemiologists believe that many more cases of the coronavirus have gone unrecorded because of insufficient testing and the mass migration of laborers within the country.
As the pandemic takes off across the developing world, the World Health Organization said this week that it was crucial for India to mobilize its people against the coronavirus.
“The future of this pandemic, to a great extent, will be determined by what happens in very large, densely populated countries,” said Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s Health Emergencies Program. “So it’s really important that India continues to take aggressive action.”
Much of the country was already observing partial lockdowns — Modi had called for a daylong “citizens’ curfew” on Sunday to show support for medical workers — but the announcement Tuesday came well after most shops had closed for the day and lacked details. Many Indians were caught off-guard as lines formed outside grocery stores and social media lit up with questions over how people would get food, cash and other necessities.
The Home Ministry eventually clarified that grocery stores, butchers, banks, pharmacies and other essential businesses would remain open, although online deliveries of goods would be encouraged. But Modi did not say how he planned to help India’s vast numbers of working poor — day laborers, construction crews, street vendors — who could no longer work and were at immediate risk of hunger and illness.
Modi’s announcement “left a gaping hole,” tweeted P. Chidambaram, a former finance minister. “Who is going to provide cash to the poor that they need for the next 21 days?”
The lockdown came even though Indian health officials, defying the views of international experts, have denied that the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 was not being transmitted within the community. For weeks they defended an extremely limited testing regime that until recently included only recent international travelers and their immediate contacts.
As of last week, India had tested only 9.2 people per million, one of the lowest rates in the world. Despite reporting its first coronavirus case Jan. 30, the Indian government did not create stockpiles and continued to export medical equipment. As India says it will expand testing, Modi pledged $2 billion for health infrastructure and equipment for frontline medical workers.
But with global disruptions to supply chains and countries worldwide racing to secure medical supplies in the pandemic, experts said India is facing crucial shortages of ventilators, testing kits, and masks, gowns and other protective equipment for health workers.
Public health experts believe the attempt to quarantine a deadly virus won’t work without an effective mitigation strategy.
“This complete lockdown might reduce the transmission significantly in the short run,” said Dr. Yogesh Jain, a community doctor and founder of the People’s Health Movement, a public health advocacy group in rural Chhattisgarh.
“It will surely bounce back with a vengeance if this is the predominant thing we do, without other public health interventions like expanding testing, isolating and treating.”
At a government hospital in the northern city of Meerut, medical staff members said their supplies of surgical masks have dwindled since the epidemic began.