Los Angeles Times

Airlines require face masks onboard, but enforcemen­t is difficult.

Short of a federal mandate, there’s not much air carriers can do if passengers refuse to cover their faces.

- BY HUGO MARTÍN

Wearing a face mask has become as much a part of flying on commercial planes as cramming too much in the overhead bin, wrestling your seatmate for the armrest and trying to charm an extra bag of peanuts from the flight attendant.

The nation’s six largest carriers are requiring passengers to wear face masks or some other suitable nose-and-mouth covering during all flights to help slow the spread of the novel coronaviru­s.

Yet social media channels are littered with complaints about mask scofflaws of the skies traveling with apparent ease. Given that flouting mask mandates has become the secondhand smoke of the COVID-19 era, why are some passengers allowed to remain barefaced?

Airlines and the nation’s largest union of flight attendants explain that they are enforcing the mask requiremen­t — but not with threats of fines or diverting flights. Instead, airline personnel are using diplomacy and de-escalation tactics. One airline said it may go as far as banning passengers from the carrier for life.

“In the unlikely scenario that someone refuses to wear a mask, we are not planning to divert a flight but would follow up with the guest,” said Alaska Airlines spokesman Ray Lane.

The lenient enforcemen­t attitude reflects several key changes in the post-pandemic aviation world, according to industry experts.

First, the requiremen­t that passengers wear masks is a policy adopted by each airline and is not a federal regulation, such as the rule against disabling an airplane lavatory’s smoke detector, which can be enforced under the threat of fines or prison time.

“Absent a federal requiremen­t that passengers wear face coverings, airlines can do only so much,” said Henry Harteveldt, an aviation analyst at Atmosphere Research Group.

Another reason for the tolerance is that demand for air travel has nosedived. About 500 flight attendants have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and there is little appetite among flight attendants or airline executives for face-to-face confrontat­ions with passengers who refuse to wear masks, nor is there a desire to divert a mostly empty plane that is already losing the airline money, experts said.

“Practicall­y speaking, these flight attendants have enough on their hands,” said Mark Gerchick, former chief counsel of the Federal Aviation Administra­tion.

In late April, New York’s JetBlue Airways was the first major U.S. carrier to require that all passengers wear masks during flights, with American, United, Delta, Southwest and Alaska adopting the same requiremen­t in early May.

The airlines said they would deny boarding to anyone who wasn’t wearing a mask at the gate. Once on the plane, flight attendants would encourage passengers to keep the masks on except when eating or drinking.

But the Assn. of Flight Attendants wants the federal government to take the extra step of adopting an industrywi­de mask-wearing requiremen­t, as well as cleaning and social distancing regulation­s for all U.S. carriers.

“Airlines are implementi­ng policies on the fly, with essentiall­y no coordinati­on or direction from the federal government,” said Sara Nelson, president of the union, which represents nearly 50,000 flight attendants at 19 airlines. “We need a federal plan of action to implement safety measures on masks, social distancing, cleaning and more. Safety, health and our entire economy is on the line.”

So far, the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion has shown little interest in imposing an industrywi­de mask policy.

In an April interview on Fox News, Secretary of Transporta­tion Elaine Chao brushed off suggestion­s that the federal government should mandate masks on airlines. She said most commercial planes are now so empty that passengers can maintain social distancing inside the cabin. Chao added that she prefers to leave policy questions about masks to the airlines and their workers.

“We encourage the unions and the management of the airlines to talk to one another,” she said.

But industry experts say that a federal regulation would be easier to enforce than the policies of an individual airline.

A passenger who violates the FAA ban on smoking on a plane or engages in “unruly behavior” can be fined up to $25,000 per violation, according to federal regulation­s. Meanwhile, a passenger who breaks an airline policy, such as boarding out of turn, can be booted off a plane and banned from ever flying on that carrier.

“The difference between the mask rule and the smoking rule is that the smoking rule carries the force of law,” said Madhu Unnikrishn­an, editor of the trade publicatio­n Skift Airline Weekly. “As we don’t have a law requiring masks onboard yet, it’s up to airlines to set individual policy. And rather than face a fight onboard, they’re choosing diplomacy.”

JetBlue is asking its f light crew to “be sensitive to all situations, use their best judgment to maintain compliance while upholding our service standards and ... try to de-escalate issues onboard to the best of their ability,” airline spokesman Derek Dombrowski said. As a last resort, he said, customers who don’t follow the policy can be banned from flying JetBlue in the future.

On United Airlines, flight attendants have been asked to use their “de-escalation skills” to deal with any disturbanc­e prompted by the mask policy. Flight attendants may also reassign a mask offender to a new seat away from other passengers, according to the airline.

On Southwest Airlines, employees and f light attendants “will respectful­ly request that customers abide by the policy,” and if they don’t, flight attendants will rely on their training in conflict management to resolve the dispute, airline spokesman Brian Parrish said.

Demand for air travel has dropped by more than 90% since March, but the number of passengers screened daily by the Transporta­tion Security Administra­tion has been rising slowly in the last three weeks. In a filing Tuesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Southwest Airlines reported that although overall bookings are down, the carrier has “recently experience­d a modest improvemen­t in passenger demand, bookings and trip cancellati­ons.”

Flight attendants and airline representa­tives worry that travelers may be less inclined to wear masks as local government­s across the country begin to lift coronaviru­s restrictio­ns. For now, they said, passengers are largely abiding by the mask rules.

“Even as states are opening up, there’s a recognitio­n that masks will be part of our new normal for some time,” said Taylor Garland, a spokeswoma­n for the Assn. of Flight Attendants.

 ?? Al Seib Los Angeles Times ?? TRAVELERS at Los Angeles Internatio­nal Airport on May 11 wear face coverings. Airlines, not federal regulators, require them.
Al Seib Los Angeles Times TRAVELERS at Los Angeles Internatio­nal Airport on May 11 wear face coverings. Airlines, not federal regulators, require them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States