Los Angeles Times

L.A. moves to cap fees charged by delivery apps

Council wants a law that would limit how much services can charge restaurant­s.

- By Emily Alpert Reyes Times staff writer Jenn Harris contribute­d to this report.

Los Angeles is pushing forward with plans to limit how much delivery services such as Postmates, Grubhub and Uber Eats can charge restaurant­s, capping delivery fees at 15% of the purchase price for orders during the COVID-19 crisis.

The City Council voted 14 to 0 Wednesday to ask city attorneys to draft such a law, following other cities including San Francisco and New York City. Restaurant­s currently pay as much as 30% in fees to third-party delivery apps, which Councilman Mitch O’Farrell denounced as exorbitant.

O’Farrell said that, during the pandemic, restaurant­s were relying much more heavily on delivery sales and had become “completely at the mercy of these third-party delivery apps.”

“If we keep going down this road, restaurant­s will be forced to raise their prices and risk losing customers,” the councilman said. “Why should restaurant­s, and their customers, be put in a position to subsidize delivery app companies? We need to level the playing field.”

The proposal passed Wednesday also would limit other fees charged by the delivery companies — those for services other than delivery — to a maximum of 5% of the purchase price of each order. And it would require that 100% of delivery tips from customers go to drivers. The restrictio­ns would end 90 days after L.A. lifts its ban on dining inside restaurant­s.

During the meeting, council members rejected a push by Councilman Bob Blumenfiel­d to limit which restaurant­s were covered by the fee cap. Blumenfiel­d, who argued that bigger chains had enough leverage to negotiate for better fees for themselves, said the fee limits should apply only to restaurant­s that had five or fewer locations.

O’Farrell countered that limiting the fee restrictio­ns to smaller businesses might prod delivery apps to drop mom-and-pop restaurant­s in favor of bigger chains. Blumenfiel­d’s proposal failed on a 4-10 vote.

Many restaurant owners have complained that they have little choice but to fork over significan­t fees to keep ferrying meals to customers because many diners don’t want to leave their homes during the coronaviru­s pandemic. One restaurate­ur called the delivery services “a necessary evil.”

“Even before the madness, it was just a terrible deal no matter how you slice it,” Anca Caliman, co-owner of Lemon Poppy Kitchen in Glassell Park and Parsnip in Highland Park, told The Times.

Although many restaurant owners have enthusiast­ically backed the proposed law as a crucial lifeline to help them survive — and some have pressed for a lower cap of 10% — others have signed a petition facilitate­d by Postmates that opposes the plan, arguing that caps would end up hurting restaurant­s.

City lawyers will now draft the proposed law, which will return to the council for final approval before it can go into effect.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States