Los Angeles Times

Churches sue over singing ban

Three in Northern California say Gov. Newsom’s COVID-related action violates the 1st Amendment.

- By Chace Beech

Three churches in Northern California have filed a federal lawsuit against Gov. Gavin Newsom, saying a ban on singing in places of worship — implemente­d to help stem the spread of the coronvirus — violates their 1st Amendment rights.

“Singing in church is a biblical mandate,” said Kevin Green, pastor of Calvary Chapel in Fort Bragg.

Churches, like all facilities in the state deemed nonessenti­al, were closed in March under the governor’s stay-at-home orders at the beginning of the pandemic. But as restrictio­ns were eased and more sectors of the economy reopened, houses of worship were allowed to welcome worshipers beginning in May, provided they adhered to health and safety protocols, which limited attendance and, at the time, discourage­d singing.

Since then, however, as the virus has surged across the state and Newsom enacted a second shutdown in much of California, the governor further tamped down on acceptable activities at church, specifying that “places of worship must ... discontinu­e indoor singing and chanting activities.”

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Redding, focuses on Newsom’s support of recent Black Lives Matter protests, many of which were prompted by the death of George Floyd while in custody of Minneapoli­s police. The plaintiffs — Green’s church, along with Calvary Chapel in Ukiah and the River of Life Church in Oroville — say the governor has protected protesters’ freedom of expression, but not that of churchgoer­s.

“It’s the inconsiste­ncy,” Green said.

“He wasn’t singling out the church until he got to that singing thing,” he said of the governor’s latest orders, issued July 6. “When a man is that inconsiste­nt, I can’t believe him, and that’s why we filed the suit.”

The lawsuit argues that Newsom has specifical­ly targeted churches as spaces where singing and chanting are not allowed, but he hasn’t placed the same restrictio­ns on other locations that remain open, such as shopping malls, child-care centers, and TV and film production locations.

“Banning singing in California churches is an unconstitu­tional abuse of power, and to do it in the name of a pandemic is despicable,” said Jordan Sekulow, one of the plaintiffs, whose father, Jay Sekulow, is a member of President Trump’s legal team. “This ban is clearly targeted at religion.”

Court records cite the governor’s endorsemen­t of the recent Black Lives Matter protests as an example of his inconsiste­ncy when it comes to freedom of speech and crowds gathering, noting that “on or about June 5, 2020, Newsom tweeted that protesters ‘have the right to protest peacefully,’ showing further support of mass protests.”

Tens of thousands have turned out across California to protest the death of Floyd and other Black Americans at the hands of police, many singing and chanting together as they marched in recent weeks. Some demonstrat­ions even turned into giant dance parties.

The governor’s office could not be reached for comment Thursday. The new guidance, released by the California Department of Public Health, notes that singing indoors can lead to an increase in coronaviru­s infection, even when proper social distancing is practiced.

Researcher­s at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have found that the virus spreads through respirator­y aerosols, which can float beyond six feet — the recommende­d distance to maintain to avoid spreading the disease. While singing, people are often breathing more deeply than they normally would, inhaling more of the air around them, further enhancing the risk of infection.

The lawsuit is not the first filed by places of worship against Newsom. In April, three Southern California churches sued Newsom and other state officials, arguing that stay-athome orders that forced their closure violate the 1st Amendment right to freedom of religion and assembly.

In late May, however, just days before Newsom relaxed restrictio­ns that allowed houses of worship to reopen, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the governor’s ban on in-person church services.

Neither Mendocino County, where the two Calvary Chapel churches are, nor Butte County, where the River of Life Church is, is on the state’s watchlist, which contains more than 30 counties facing extended restrictio­ns from the state, including the closure of indoor church services.

But on Wednesday evening, Mendocino officials announced the county’s first coronaviru­s-related death and said it was likely the county would be added to the monitoring list in the next 48 hours.

Green posted a notice on Calvary Chapel’s Facebook page saying, “Due to Mendocino County orders, Calvary Chapel Fort Bragg will be suspending all public meetings once again until further notice.”

 ?? K.C. Alfred San Diego Union-Tribune ?? THE CHURCHES that filed the suit are in Northern California. Above, a San Diego church in March.
K.C. Alfred San Diego Union-Tribune THE CHURCHES that filed the suit are in Northern California. Above, a San Diego church in March.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States