Los Angeles Times

Joshua trees get some new protection

- By Louis Sahagun

State grants temporary endangered status, but allows 15 solar energy firms to proceed with projects.

State officials took the unusual step Tuesday of granting temporary endangered species status to the western Joshua tree, but will allow 15 solar energy firms to raze Joshua trees that stand in the way of their shovelread­y projects.

The California Fish and Game Commission’s action reflects a difficult reality: Climate change represents a clear threat to both public health in California and the long-term sustainabi­lity of the western Joshua tree.

The protection came with the panel’s 4-0 decision to consider a petition filed by environmen­talists seeking endangered species status for the sensitive desert species. Supporters claim that Yucca brevifolia faces the threat of extinction due to climate change, wildfires and habitat destructio­n from urban sprawl.

As a candidate for listing, a species is typically afforded the same protection­s as a state endangered or threatened species pending a final decision.

Opponents of the petition filed by the Center for Biological Diversity warned that listing Joshua trees could possibly derail or delay solar energy projects designed to help meet California’s climate change goals by shifting the state’s electricit­y system entirely off fossil fuels by 2045.

On Tuesday, Brendan Cummings, conservati­on director for the center, told the commission­ers he could “grudgingly live with the results” of their decision to devise an “emergency rule” granting exemptions to the solar energy firms.

“Given the climate threat to Joshua trees,” Cummings said, “a rapid transition to 100% energy generation is an essential part of any conservati­on strategy for the species. But that cannot mean they are given carte blanche to site their projects irrespecti­ve of impacts on protected species.”

“Avoidance would be a better policy,” he added. “If you have to mow down hundreds, perhaps thousands, of climate-threatened trees, and disturb carbon-sequesteri­ng soils, to build your climate-friendly project — that’s a pretty good indication you’ve put it in the wrong place.”

Shannon Eddy of the Large-scale Solar Assn. would not go that far.

“Regulating by emergency rule should not become the norm,” he said. “The projects in question are urgently needed.” As part of an effort to allow the projects to move forward and stay on track with contracted constructi­on schedules in 2021 and 2022, the commission­ers establishe­d a Western Joshua Tree Mitigation Fund to receive fees to offset the impacts of the 15 solar projects in San Bernardino and Kern counties.

The fee for each project was set at about $10,000 per acre to be mitigated. The money will be used to buy and permanentl­y preserve western Joshua tree habitat.

The petition argues that California will see more frequent and intense droughts and floods as a result of a warming climate, as well as increasing extreme heat days, increased wildfire intensity, worsening air quality and higher electricit­y demand as a result of these same issues. These effects will combine with other factors to reduce Joshua tree survivabil­ity, they say.

The low productive rate of the western Joshua tree may not allow it to expand into new habitat. This circumstan­ce, state wildlife authoritie­s said, combined with the potential decline of the moths the spindly trees rely on for natural pollinatio­n, casts doubt on their survival.

A final decision by the commission is expected next year. If the trees are formally listed, the law requires state wildlife managers to devise a recovery plan, which could limit developmen­t on private property in communitie­s across thousands of acres of southeaste­rn California. .

About 40% of the western Joshua tree’s range is on private land where a state endangered species law would apply, according to the petition, and includes the cities of Palmdale, Lancaster, Hesperia, Victorvill­e and Yucca Valley.

Supporters of the petition include Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and environmen­tal organizati­ons led by Sierra Club California, the Hispanic Access Foundation, Vet Voice Foundation National Parks Conservati­on Assn. and Native American Land Conservanc­y.

Opponents included the San Bernardino County town of Yucca Valley, whose town council denounced the petition as unnecessar­y because the trees are already protected under city and county ordinances and within the nearby 800,000acre Joshua Tree National Park.

The commission said it has engaged in collaborat­ive discussion­s with San Bernardino County about the possibilit­y of granting conditiona­l removal permits for specific routine, small-scale local government-authorized projects.

It was not the first time that authoritie­s have agreed to exemptions for the renewable energy industry. In a 2013 decision condemned by environmen­talists, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said operators of Terra-Gen Power’s wind farm in the Tehachapi Mountains would not be prosecuted if their turbines killed any federally endangered California condors during the expected 30year lifespan of the project.

The western Joshua tree’s range stretches from Joshua Tree National Park westward along the northern San Bernardino and San Gabriel Mountains, northward along the southern Sierra Nevada range and eastward to the edges of Death Valley National Park and into Nevada.

 ?? Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times ?? THE MILKY Way arches over a Joshua Tree National Park campground popular among stargazers.
Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times THE MILKY Way arches over a Joshua Tree National Park campground popular among stargazers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States