Swiss reject limitations on EU citizens
Voters defeat bid from nationalist party to curb who can live and work in the country.
‘ Especially at this time, during the difficult economic situation caused by the [ coronavirus] crisis, good relations with our neighbors and with the EU are important.’
— Karin Keller- Sutter, Switzerland’s justice minister
GENEVA — Voters in Switzerland on Sunday strongly defeated a nationalist party’s proposal to limit the number of European Union citizens allowed to live and work in the country.
Swiss public broadcaster SRF reported that the measure was rejected by 61.7% of voters, with 38.3% in favor. All but four of the country’s 26 cantons, or states, likewise opposed the plan — proposed by the Swiss People’s Party — to give preferential access to jobs, social protection and benefits to people from Switzerland over those from the 27- nation bloc that surrounds it.
The government had warned that the measure could further strain the rich Alpine’s country’s deep and lucrative ties to the EU. It could also have triggered reciprocal disadvantages for millions of Swiss citizens who want to live or work in the EU.
“Especially at this time, during the difficult economic situation caused by the [ coronavirus] crisis, good relations with our neighbors and with the EU are impor
tant,” Justice Minister Karin Keller- Sutter said, welcoming the outcome of the vote.
She said Switzerland would continue to pursue a “bilateral path” with the EU, eschewing membership in the bloc while seeking close
economic ties with it.
In a nod to the misgivings many Swiss have about the country’s big neighbor, Keller- Sutter acknowledged that “freedom of movement doesn’t just have benefits.”
“The Federal Council
only wants as much immigration as necessary,” she said. “That continues to be our goal.”
Roughly 1.4 million EU citizens live in the country of about 8.6 million, while around 500,000 Swiss live
in EU countries. Some are dual citizens and would not have been affected by any restrictions.
In a similar referendum in 2014, the Swiss narrowly voted in favor of limiting EU citizens’ freedom to live and work in Switzerland. Lawmakers, however, refused to fully implement that referendum, fearing a sizable impact on Swiss society and businesses, prompting the People’s Party to get the issue back on the ballot this year.
Since the last vote, Switzerland has witnessed the turmoil that Britain’s 2016 referendum to leave the EU has caused, especially for EU citizens in the U. K. and Britons living on the Continent. Britain left the EU in January but is in a transition period until the end of the year, with prospects for a deal on future relations between London and Brussels still uncertain.
Voter Yann Grote in Geneva said he didn’t approve of further limiting freedom of movement.
“I’m not at all in favor, and even more now, because it’s not a time to isolate Switzerland,” he said.
Voter Elisabeth Lopes agreed.
“I’m a daughter of immigrants, so it is a matter that touches me,” she said. “If Switzerland had to withdraw or reduce these agreements [ with the EU], I think we would be the real losers.”
In Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the result of the referendum, calling it “a positive signal to continue to consolidate and deepen our relationship.”
She also urged Switzerland to approve a series of agreements that were negotiated between the country and the EU in 2018 but are not yet ratified.
The measure on freedom of movement was being considered alongside nationwide votes on several other issues.
SRF reported that a majority of voters backed plans for paid paternity leave and for the purchase of about $ 6.5 billion worth of new f ighter planes by 2030. Voters rejected measures on the right to hunt wolves to keep their population down and an increase in tax breaks for child care.