Los Angeles Times

California sues Amazon in worker safety investigat­ion

Attorney general asks judge to force retailer to fully comply with informatio­n requests.

- By Patrick McGreevy and Suhauna Hussain

SACRAMENTO — California is taking Amazon to court to force the online retail giant to cooperate with a months- long investigat­ion into whether the company is doing enough to protect its workers from the coronaviru­s, Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra said Monday.

Becerra said his office had asked a Sacramento County Superior Court judge to order Amazon to comply with outstandin­g investigat­ive subpoenas, alleging the f irm has not adequately responded to requests for informatio­n.

The attorney general’s office issued the subpoenas in August as part of an investigat­ion into Amazon’s protocols for protecting employees from COVID- 19 and the status of virus cases at the company’s facilities throughout California.

“Amazon has made billions during this pandemic relying on the labor of essential workers. Their workers get the job done while putting themselves at risk,” Becerra said in a statement Monday. “It’s critical to know if these workers are receiving the protection­s on the job that they are entitled to under the law.”

An Amazon representa­tive released a statement that challenged Becerra’s action.

“We’re puzzled by the At

torney General’s sudden rush to court because we’ve been working cooperativ­ely for months and their claims of noncomplia­nce with their demands don’t line up with the facts,” the statement said.

The company added said it has invested billions of dollars in equipment and technology, including building on- site testing for employees and providing personal protective equipment.

“The bottom line is that we’re a leader in providing COVID- 19 safety measures for our employees,” the statement said. “We encourage anyone to compare our speed and actions in this area to any other major employer.”

With COVID- 19- related deaths topping 21,000 in California, state health officials are directing more and more bricks- and- mortar businesses to restrict operations, forcing many people to rely again on internet purchases.

Amazon’s growth has been turbocharg­ed since the pandemic was declared in March. The company added nearly half a million employees this year, many of whom were hired to work in warehouses that dot rural communitie­s and suburbs across the country. But with that growth came worker safety concerns.

California’s Division of Occupation­al Safety and Health, known as Cal/ OSHA, levied $ 1,870 in f ines on Amazon in early October for COVID- 19 safety violations. Labor advocates said the f ines came months too late and were too small to motivate the company to do better.

Other essential businesses that continued to operate even as much of California was forced to shut down because of the pandemic have faced similar criticisms from workers. Grocery stores and manufactur­ers that have seen large outbreaks of infections too were hit with fines by Cal/ OSHA.

Retail workers as well as food delivery workers said they were not given adequate personal protective equipment or support from their employers, even as they faced a higher risk of exposure to the virus. They protested, demanding more protection­s and hazard pay.

Sheheryar Kaoosji, executive director of labor advocacy group Warehouse Worker Resource Center, which helped workers f ile safety complaints with Cal/ OSHA in the spring, said he has heard repeatedly from workers that safety protocols are enforced inconsiste­ntly or poorly communicat­ed to workers.

“Amazon has a consistent pattern of trying to block and hide informatio­n. This is not the kind of response the second- biggest employer in the country should be making,” Kaoosji said.

In some department­s, warehouse workers are forced to cluster up to get their job done, yet the company maintains the same staffing levels and speed of work, he said.

Amazon officials said in October that its safety protocols, including testing, tracing, cleaning and social distancing, meant their “employees are at a very low risk of transmissi­on in the workplace.”

The probe by the attorney general’s office is looking for details about the nature and extent of Amazon’s coronaviru­s prevention efforts, including an examinatio­n of sick leave policies and cleaning procedures.

Becerra’s investigat­ors are also seeking data on the number of infections and COVID- 19- related deaths at some 150 Amazon facilities in California.

The attorney general said during an online news conference Monday that the informatio­n sought includes which Amazon facilities have suffered the largest outbreaks, whether the company has been sued by employees over the issue, how many employees have complained about conditions and whether the company has retaliated against any workers who complained.

Becerra said the request for court interventi­on was urgent.

“If Amazon can next- day deliver an 85- inch TV, it should be able to deliver to the Department of Justice the straightfo­rward informatio­n we officially requested of them nearly four months ago,” Becerra told reporters.

Representa­tives of Amazon employees have complained for months about working conditions during the COVID- 19 pandemic and organized a march to Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’ Beverly Hills mansion in October.

The October protest was held a week after Amazon disclosed that nearly 20,000 of its front- line U. S. workers had tested positive or were presumed positive for the coronaviru­s. However, the online retail f irm said at the time that the infection rate of its employees was well below that found in the general U. S. population.

The march was organized by the Congress of Essential Workers, a group that includes warehouse workers and was founded by former Amazon warehouse manager Chris Smalls, who said he was fired this year for putting together a work stoppage over the company’s response to the pandemic.

The group demanded that Amazon provide employees with protective equipment against the virus as well as cleaning supplies and hazard pay.

Early in the pandemic, workers at eight Amazon facilities in Southern California tested positive in for the virus, including a fulfillmen­t center in San Bernardino, the inbound cross- dock warehouse in Rialto, a delivery center in Hawthorne and a smaller Amazon Prime Now warehouse in the Glassell Park neighborho­od of Los Angeles.

Facilities in Riverside and San Bernardino counties also reported cases in late March.

The online retail giant said early in the pandemic that it was taking steps to reduce infection in its facilities, including by increasing the frequency and intensity of cleaning, staggering shift times to promote social distancing, and suspending exit screenings to check for stealing because they can cause people to jam together at exits.

Southern California Amazon workers circulated a petition early in the pandemic that said: “Amazon is trying to take precaution­s to slow the spread of COVID- 19, but the fact of the matter is we work with so many people every single day that we are in constant danger.”

 ?? I rfan Khan Los Angeles Times ?? WAREHOUSE WORKERS at Amazon say they haven’t been adequately protected from the coronaviru­s. Above, an Amazon facility in Hawthorne in May.
I rfan Khan Los Angeles Times WAREHOUSE WORKERS at Amazon say they haven’t been adequately protected from the coronaviru­s. Above, an Amazon facility in Hawthorne in May.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States