Los Angeles Times

Putting the focus on climate

The president’s actions on global warming are a needed shift, but we need to do more. And do it fast.

-

The Earth is, beyond reasonable doubt, careening toward climate catastroph­e in a man-made crisis propelled by the technologi­cal advancemen­ts that enabled us to power homes, businesses and cities with fossil fuels, and then exacerbate­d by a dangerous level of political and economic myopia. Now the world is watching the results of global warming, and the impacts are undeniable — as is the hard reality that we have waited too long and done too little to fix it.

The advent of the Biden administra­tion, while not some sudden flick of a switch to a better future, is neverthele­ss welcome. His announceme­nt Wednesday of additional climate-focused policies — aimed at, among other things, ending carbon pollution from power plants by 2035, reaching a national net-zero economy by 2050 and bolstering communitie­s that have been disproport­ionately affected by emissions — followed firstday executive actions that sought to undo many of the dangerous and ill-advised policies of the Trump administra­tion.

This is by no means an exhaustive list, but so far Biden has ordered that climate change be part of policy decisions across the federal government, rescinded a presidenti­al permit for the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to Nebraska, halted new oil and gas developmen­ts in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, ordered a freeze and review of Trump regulation­s promoting fossil fuels and rolling back vehicle emissions standards, and announced that the U.S. would rejoin the 2015 Paris agreement.

He also pledged Monday to replace the federal government’s fleet of about 650,000 motor vehicles with electric models, which would be a significan­t boon to the fledgling market for clean cars and trucks.

Good. Keep going, Mr. President. One of the many lessons reinforced by the Trump administra­tion, however, is that executive actions can be fleeting. Good policies by one administra­tion can be undone by the next and then reversed again by a third. Combating climate change is too vital to our existence for such fickleness.

Congress needs to involve itself here to both stabilize how the nation approaches energy policy and to craft laws that will force the U.S. into a faster and more robust transition from fossil fuels to renewables while helping workers and communitie­s adapt.

We won’t get prescripti­ve about specifics (though here’s one: Congress ought to revoke its 2017 approval of drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge), but some broad contours are clear, and frameworks have already been floated by members of Congress.

We need the government to intervene in the energy system, from production to consumptio­n, through laws and regulation­s that will hasten the build-out of electric charging stations and lower the price of electric vehicles, create disincenti­ves for vehicles that burn fossil fuels (a carbon tax would be a good start), and offer incentives to consumers to scrap existing gas-guzzlers (the three top-selling motor vehicles in the U.S. last year were relatively low-mpg pickup trucks). We also need to get more aggressive and creative in designing green new buildings, retrofitti­ng old structures and converting homes from heating with natural gas or oil to renewable electricit­y.

Yes, we can hear the sputtering. This is going to be insanely expensive. But it’s unavoidabl­e. Remember, it was a technologi­cal leap — harnessing the energy of burned coal to run industrial machinery — that led us to this point, and we are entirely capable of fresh technologi­cal breakthrou­ghs to lead us to a different future.

There is no single solution. In fact, ending all carbon emissions tomorrow would still leave us the effects of past emissions, which will have to be mitigated through massive reforestat­ion and carbon-removal techniques that do not yet exist. We need fresh thinking, not just in how we create energy but in how machinery uses it.

Global leaders know this. It’s what led them to the Paris agreement in the first place. Biden has made the fight a key part of his administra­tion, appointing as his internatio­nal emissary John F. Kerry — who as President Obama’s secretary of State was a key figure behind the Paris deal — and creating a White House office to direct domestic climate policies. But the horizon is nearing at a faster pace than experts realized just a few short years ago.

It’s numbing, and depressing, to contemplat­e how little the U.S. and the world have done to combat global warming in the five years since the Paris agreement. Even as the world’s nations agreed to work together to try to keep the rise in global temperatur­es to less than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustr­ial levels, with a target of 1.5 degrees, scientists have warned that individual nations are not doing enough to achieve that goal.

The past brought us here. The present will determine our future. We are collective­ly the cause of, and the solution to, this problem. We must get to it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States