Sacrifice wildlife for wind power?

Re: “Hatching a plan to save condors,” Feb. 28

I am repelled by the phrase “minimize costs and maximize profits” in relation to protecting California’s condors.

Wind turbines have been around for decades. The issue of birds colliding with blades was a consideration from the start. I had long thought a solution had been found in having flashing lights on the setup. Yet “thousands” of eagles, hawks and bats are killed each year?

European countries like Germany and Norway generate power from the wind. Is the ground beneath their turbines littered with carcasses too? Has anyone checked with the social democracies to see whether they have a solution? Lisa Edmondson

Los Angeles in a different ecosystem and has been replaced by the turkey vulture in its ecological niche.

Critically endangered species like the monarch butterfly go unlisted because the government does not have the resources to invest in their recovery, while we pour dollars down the drain trying to reverse the judgment of Mother Nature. It is time to let the condor rise or fall on its own and exercise a little ecological justice to help the many other endangered species survive. Mike Post Winnetka

Plan? How about NOT building wind turbines in the condor habitat in the first place? That way, no plan would be needed.

Just a suggestion. David L. McDaniel Capistrano Beach

It is unfortunate the condor remains a poster child for the Endangered Species Act. Tens of millions of tax dollars later, this remnant of the Pleistocene megafauna is still unable to survive and breed in the wild without human intervention. Why? Because this bird evolved