Los Angeles Times

Revolt of the 12%

-

Re “The recall circus is returning,” March 18

It is time to change California’s recall law. Currently, only 12% of the number of people who voted in the last statewide election need to sign a recall petition to force a vote. Realistica­lly, this means that a small minority of voters who do not like the governor can force the state to waste vast amounts of money on a popularity contest.

The 12% threshold might have been reasonable in past political environmen­ts. But today, expressing displeasur­e with those who believe differentl­y has become the top priority for many voters. As a result, wasting money on recall elections is deemed an acceptable price for making one’s voice heard.

In considerat­ion of our new political reality, the number of signatures required on a recall petition should be dramatical­ly increased. The governor should face a recall election only if a tidal wave of voters has lost confidence in him and rises up in opposition.

At least 50% of registered voters should have to sign a recall petition before an election is authorized.

Forbes Black

Santa Clarita

The “recall circus is returning”? Are you kidding me? Has The Times Editorial Board not noticed the political circus going on this past year in California?

People are losing jobs, are not receiving their unemployme­nt checks, are not able to send their kids to school, and you are writing about the “recall circus”?

As the governor says, let’s meet the moment — by electing a person who can govern us out of this mess.

George Perez

Hacienda Heights

Assuming the recall of Gov. Gavin Newsom makes it to voters, California­ns need to vote in droves to defeat the recall like we did to elect President Biden.

Trying to recall Newsom for his pandemic performanc­e is a headscratc­her. California is in the bottom half of states when it comes to COVID-19 infection rates, and we have seen an amazing 40% drop in new infections in the last two weeks.

No matter your subjective feelings about Newsom’s performanc­e, California has done better than most states, and every week more counties are able to open their economies and schools safely. Whether we liked the lockdowns, mandates and restrictio­ns is irrelevant. Newsom followed the recommenda­tions of the epidemiolo­gical experts, and his response has saved lives.

The vast majority of California­ns will support the governor by defeating the recall effort.

Tom Tyner

Clovis, Calif.

Regrettabl­y, The Times Editorial Board is either suffering from Stockholm Syndrome or has an apparent stake in trying to talk people out of exercising their rights when it comes to recalling inept elected officials.

I am amazed how The Times has fallen in line with Newsom making the recall about all that it isn’t.

This is not about anything other than Newsom’s incessant ineptitude as governor. This isn’t about Republican­s, Democrats or independen­ts. Newsom needs to face the voters and be held accountabl­e to them. I have no expectatio­n as to the party membership of his successor, other than to say that we can do much better than Newsom.

As a person who volunteere­d considerab­le time and energy at petitionsi­gning booths, I can assure you that the signers were from all across the political spectrum. So many of them thanked us for doing what we were doing, and this was consistent with each weekend that passed.

Chuck Buquet

Rancho Cucamonga

I’m not crazy about Newsom, but you’d better believe that I will vote against recalling him one year before he comes up for reelection.

What a ridiculous waste of time and energy.

Renee Leask

Glendale

 ?? Carolyn Cole Los Angeles Times ?? GOV. NEWSOM, seen in front of the hospital ship USNS Mercy last March, may face a recall election.
Carolyn Cole Los Angeles Times GOV. NEWSOM, seen in front of the hospital ship USNS Mercy last March, may face a recall election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States