Los Angeles Times

Refugee limits spark outcry

White House appears to walk back Biden’s decision to maintain Trump’s cap of 15,000.

- By Molly O’Toole

WASHINGTON — President Biden kept in place Friday the Trump administra­tion’s historical­ly low cap of 15,000 refugees allowed into to the United States, a reversal of promises to let in over 60,000 people fleeing danger and persecutio­n this year.

Biden’s decision signaled a break from his vows on the campaign trail and in the White House, as well as his broader rhetorical commitment to quickly replace former President Trump’s nativist-fueled immigratio­n policies with a more humane approach. The move drew outrage from refugee advocates as well as Democrats, who criticized the president more strongly than they have on any issue in his first months in office — which prompted a walk-back from the White House within hours.

“There are simply no excuses for today’s disgracefu­l decision,” tweeted Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose family fled civil war in Somalia. “It goes directly against our values and risks the lives of little boys and girls huddled in refugee camps around the world. I know, because I was one.”

“Say it ain’t so, President Joe,” said Sen. Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2ranked Democrat in the Senate.

“I want to reflect my deep concern about the extremely low refugee cap announced today by the Biden administra­tion,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). “I find it surprising.”

After hours of outcry over Biden’s order, known as an emergency presidenti­al determinat­ion, the White House appeared to backtrack, saying in a statement later Friday that Biden would announce a new cap

next month.

“We expect the president to set a final, increased refugee cap for the remainder of this fiscal year by May 15,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said.

The Biden administra­tion earlier Friday attributed the decision to keep the low refugee cap on the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and of rebuilding the U.S. refugee program, which the previous administra­tion effectivel­y dismantled.

“It was even more decimated than we’d thought, requiring a major overhaul in order to build back toward the numbers to which we’ve committed,” a senior administra­tion official said in a statement to The Times. The White House declined to name the official or provide a reason for anonymity. “That build back is and has been happening and will enable us to support much increased admissions numbers in future years.”

In the emergency determinat­ion, the administra­tion said it would reallocate the 15,000 slots to more equitably distribute them among vulnerable refugees from Africa and the Middle East — regions targeted by Trump’s bans — and it would speed up processing by increased testing, vaccine access and travel approval, according to the official’s statement.

In February, Biden said he’d raise the refugee cap for next fiscal year to 125,000, and would put a “down payment” on that pledge this year. In a report to Congress, his administra­tion proposed a ceiling of 62,500 slots this year.

“It’s going to take time to rebuild what has been so badly damaged, but that’s precisely what we’re going to do,” Biden said at the time.

The about-face from that position early Friday to keep the 15,000 refugee cap immediatel­y prompted calls from some of the president’s closest supporters urging another reversal.

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, noted the administra­tion’s earlier proposal to set the cap at 62,500 slots this year.

“The United States has a proud, bipartisan tradition of providing refugees protection through resettleme­nt,” Menendez said in a statement. “As we face the largest global refugee crisis in history, with 29.6 million refugees worldwide, resettleme­nt serves as a critical tool.”

Menendez also said the decision was preventing the State Department from admitting vetted refugees already waiting in the system.

More than 100,000 refugees await resettleme­nt to the United States, according to Amnesty Internatio­nal, including 35,000 refugees already approved for placement. Since January, over 700 of them have had flights to the U.S. canceled at the last minute.

“Today, President Biden is turning his back on tens of thousands of refugees around the world,” Amnesty’s Joanne Lin said in a statement.

As concern spread among White House allies, Psaki said in her statement that there had been “some confusion” over Biden’s directive, and she gave the new May 15 date for an announceme­nt on an increased cap.

But her statement also said: “Given the decimated refugee admissions program we inherited, and burdens on the Office of Refugee Resettleme­nt, [the president’s] initial goal of 62,500 seems unlikely.”

Since the fiscal year began on Oct. 1, just over 2,000 refugees have been resettled in the U.S., putting the Biden administra­tion behind pace to reach even 15,000 — the lowest ceiling set since the refugee program began 40 years ago.

Trump’s administra­tion set that cap in its last year; some of his White House advisors had pushed for zero.

Psaki said earlier Friday that the administra­tion’s delayed action on refugee admissions was due in part to an increase in migration to the southern border. She said resources for vetting, processing and resettling refugees in the U.S. have been diverted to respond to the increase.

“It is a factor,” said Psaki, noting that the Office of Refugee Resettleme­nt at the Health and Human Services Department, which is charged with the care of unaccompan­ied migrant children, “does management and has personnel working on both issues, and so we have to ensure that there is capacity and ability to manage both.”

The federal government is holding about 20,000 lone migrant children in its custody, and March marked the highest number of unaccompan­ied minors ever recorded seeking asylum at the border, according to U.S. officials.

Still, the Biden administra­tion is quickly expelling some 70% of migrants at the border, under a Trump-era pandemic policy known as Title 42; the overwhelmi­ng majority of those migrants are single adults.

Refugee and asylum procedures are separate and distinct: Refugee status is applied for from outside the United States, whereas asylum — a legal right afforded to migrants — is claimed at or within U.S. borders.

Refugees do not choose which country they will be resettled in; that recommenda­tion is made primarily by the United Nations. To be placed in the United States, refugees must pass the strictest vetting process in the world, which takes well over a year.

The processing of refugees and asylum seekers is handled by different officials within U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services, in coordinati­on with the State Department and other federal agencies. Migrants at the border are first met by Customs and Border Protection officers.

Friday’s emergency determinat­ion will lift Trump’s restrictio­ns on resettling refugees from Somalia, Syria and Yemen, administra­tion officials said.

 ?? Carolyn Cole Los Angeles Times ?? THE INCREASE in migration at the southern border has diverted resources, the administra­tion said in explaining its delayed action on refugee admissions.
Carolyn Cole Los Angeles Times THE INCREASE in migration at the southern border has diverted resources, the administra­tion said in explaining its delayed action on refugee admissions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States