Senate votes to curb methane
Action would reverse Trump rule that ended Obama policy
WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats have voted to reverse a Trump-era Environmental Protection Agency rule that limits regulation of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas and a major contributor to climate change.
Wednesday’s 52-42 vote marks Democrats’ first use of the Congressional Review Act to overturn a policy put in place by a Republican president. The House must still vote before it reaches President Biden’s desk. The White House has said Biden supports overturning the Trump rule.
That tightening methane regulations is the Democrats’ first use of the law shows how important it is, Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (DN.Y.) said at a news conference Wednesday. “It’s really vital,” Schumer said.
What does the rule look to accomplish?
Former President Trump’s rule lifted an Obama-era regulation that required oil and gas companies to find and fix methane leaks at drilling sites and oil and gas facilities.
The resolution to undo it would in effect reinstate the Obama administration’s rule that placed restrictions on the emission of methane. Sen. Martin Heinrich (DN.M.) sponsored the Senate resolution. Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) filed the House companion version.
Essentially, the Democrats are undoing Trump’s attempt to undo an Obamaera rule. “What we’re voting on today is the legislative equivalent of a double negative,” said Sen. Angus King (I-Maine).
How are they overturning it?
The Congressional Review Act gives Congress a short window to review and reject regulations. It’s largely been used as a threat to get agencies to change the rules before they go into effect, but Republicans used the act 16 times at the start of Trump’s term to get rid of Obama administration policies. Before then it had been used only once, when Republicans overturned a Clinton administration policy.
CRA resolutions are not subject to the filibuster and can pass with a simple majority. On Wednesday, GOP Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Rob Portman of Ohio joined Democrats and allied independents in voting to overturn the methane rule.
Democrats have a limited window to use the Congressional Review Act to stop the 1,490 rules the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center estimates were approved in the final months of the Trump administration and are eligible to be overturned. The Congressional Review Act sets deadlines by which lawmakers can file resolutions to overturn the rules and by which they have to vote. Just six resolutions were filed by the initial deadline.
Why should I care about methane?
Methane receives less attention than carbon dioxide, which makes up most of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, but it’s a serious threat.
Methane absorbs far more heat than carbon dioxide, and its emissions are rising. Scientists have said that reducing methane leaks — as well as curbing venting and flaring of natural gas — could be one of the fastest ways to slow climate change. A study published Tuesday in the journal Environmental Research Letters found that swiftly cutting methane emissions could slow the rate of the Earth’s warming as much as 30%.
“If we do this, if we stop venting, if we stop flaring, if we stop leaking at the wellhead, if we stop leaking in the pipelines that connect the rest of the country, we can have an enormous impact on how much our atmosphere warms,” Heinrich said Tuesday before the vote.
What happens if there is no action?
The Biden administration could write a new rule, a process that can take months or years.
Companies could seek out and plug the leaks on their own.
Addressing them is a priority of the Biden administration’s climate goals.
Last week, Biden announced at a world climate summit that he’s doubling the country’s original commitment to slashing greenhouse gas emissions, making the United States’ goal one of the most ambitious in the world.
Biden has also indicated that fixing methane leaks is one of the job-creation items he plans to include in the infrastructure package he is sending to Congress, saying the government could pay unemployed pipe fitters and miners to help cap the country’s 100,000 “orphan wells” that have been abandoned.
What does it mean for California?
California’s state restrictions on methane leaks exceed even the Obama rule that Congress wants to go back to, so for California companies the change means very little. More than half of California’s methane emissions come from livestock rather than oil and gas companies, according to the California Air Resources Board, the state’s top regulator for air quality and climate.
“California already has the toughest on-the-planet methane rule. The new federal rule will not change the current strict environmental protections that California producers already follow,” California Independent Petroleum Assn. Chief Executive Rock Zierman said in a statement.
Environmental groups called the rule modest for California, saying they’d prefer political leaders phase out fossil fuel extraction altogether.
“Reinstating Obama-era methane rules will provide a stop-gap, modest benefit to states like California, where methane leaks from oil production cause serious health and environmental problems,” Clare Lakewood, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, said in a statement.