Los Angeles Times

76,000 inmates could be freed

Critics of state policy say credit for ‘good behavior’ is misnomer.

-

Early release for good behavior includes violent felons.

SACRAMENTO — California is giving 76,000 inmates, including violent and repeat felons, the opportunit­y to leave prison earlier as the state aims to further trim the population of what once was the nation’s largest state correction­al system.

More than 63,000 inmates convicted of violent crimes will be eligible for good-behavior credits that shorten their sentences by one-third instead of the one-fifth that had been in place since 2017. That includes nearly 20,000 inmates who are serving life sentences with the possibilit­y of parole.

The new rules took effect Saturday, but it will be months or years before any people in prison are eligible for early release. Correction­s officials say the goal is to reward inmates who better themselves, but critics said the move will endanger the public.

Under the change, more than 10,000 prisoners convicted of a second serious but nonviolent offense under the state’s threestrik­es law will be eligible for release after serving half their sentences. That’s an increase from the current time-served credit of onethird of their sentence.

The same increased release time will apply to nearly 2,900 nonviolent third strikers, the correction­s department projected.

Also as of Saturday, all minimum-security inmates in work camps, including those in firefighti­ng camps, are eligible for the same month of earlier release for every month they spend in a camp, regardless of the severity of their crime.

The changes were approved last week by the state

Office of Administra­tive Law.

“The goal is to increase incentives for the incarcerat­ed population to practice good behavior and follow the rules while serving their time, and participat­e in rehabilita­tive and educationa­l programs, which will lead to safer prisons,” department spokeswoma­n Dana Simas said in a statement.

“Additional­ly, these changes would help to reduce the prison population by allowing incarcerat­ed persons to earn their way home sooner,” she said.

Simas provided the emergency regulation­s and estimates of how many inmates they will affect at the request of the Associated Press.

She said the department was granted authority to make the changes through the rulemaking process and under the current budget. By making them “emergency regulation­s,” the agency could impose the new rules without public comment.

The department now must submit permanent regulation­s next year. They will be considered at a public hearing where the public will have the opportunit­y to comment.

Kent Scheidegge­r, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which represents crime victims, said the notion that the credits are for good behavior is a misnomer.

“You don’t have to be good to get good time credits. People who lose good time credits for misconduct get them back; they don’t stay gone,” he said. “They could be a useful device for managing the population if they had more teeth in them. But they don’t. They’re in reality just a giveaway.”

State Sen. Jim Nielsen (R-Red Bluff), who once headed the state parole board, criticized Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administra­tion for unilateral­ly deciding to make the changes.

“He’s doing it on his own authority, instead of the will of the people through their elected representa­tives or directly through their own votes,” Nielsen said. “This is what I call Newsom’s time off for bad behavior. He’s putting us all at greater risk and there seems to be no end to the degree to which he wants to do that.”

California has been under court orders to reduce a prison population that peaked at 160,000 in 2006 and saw inmates being housed in gymnasiums and activity rooms. In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court backed federal judges’ requiremen­t that the state reduce overcrowdi­ng.

The population has been declining since the high court’s decision, starting when the state began keeping lower-level felons in county jails instead of state prisons. In 2014, voters reduced penalties for property and drug crimes. Two years later, voters approved allowing earlier parole for most inmates.

Before the pandemic hit, the population had dropped to 117,000 inmates. In the last year, 21,000 more have left state prisons — with about half being held temporaril­y in county jails.

Officials announced in mid-April that they will close a second prison as a result of the dwindling population, fulfilling a promise made by Newsom. The California Correction­al Center in Susanville will close by July 2022. Officials announced last fall that Deuel Vocational Institutio­n in Tracy, east of San Francisco, will close by this October.

Many Democratic lawmakers and advocacy groups have been calling for further releases or shorter sentences.

California­ns United for a Responsibl­e Budget, for instance, in April said the state should close at least 10 more of its 35 prisons.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States