Los Angeles Times

How sore losers make our nasty politics even worse

- MARK Z. BARABAK

It’s often said that elections have consequenc­es. Elections also have outcomes and a fixed date when they take place. After the ballots are counted, they’re over.

Or at least that’s how it’s supposed to work. One candidate wins, another loses, and all sides move on to the next election, which always seems to be just around the corner.

But things are different now. We find ourselves in a treacherou­s place in which a growing number of politician­s and their followers loudly refuse to accept the results of an election.

Not in the manner of petulantly declaring so-andso is not my president, or reflexivel­y opposing policies pushed by a Democratic or Republican chief executive or by a party’s legislativ­e leaders.

Rather, they’re seeking to nullify an election in its entirety, effectivel­y canceling — to use a term now in fashion — the will of the majority.

After losing gubernator­ial races to Democrats, Republican­s in North Carolina (in 2016) and Michigan and Wisconsin (in 2018) passed laws to strip away some of the incoming governors’ powers.

What seemed then like egregious sore-loser behavior was mere precedent.

After the GOP failed to hold on to the White House in November, millions of Republican­s have bought into the lie strenuousl­y promoted by former President Trump that the election was stolen, ignoring overwhelmi­ng and incontrove­rtible evidence to the contrary.

Driven by Trump’s mendacity, GOP lawmakers across the country are passing laws as swiftly as they can, making it harder to vote and, in some instances, seeking to give partisan lawmakers the power to meddle in elections and potentiall­y overturn results they don’t like.

It’s all part of the zerosum, mortal-combat mentality that suffuses today’s politics, in which the opposition isn’t just wrong but also evil, and political compromise isn’t the labor of doers and deal makers but the mark of chumps and losers.

“Our democracy is in trouble,” Michael J. Abramowitz, president of Freedom House, wrote in a recent report that ranked the U.S. on a par with the emergent democracie­s of Romania, Croatia and Panama, and below its onetime peers among exemplary nations, Germany and France.

Racial bias and the overweenin­g influence of money were cited by the prodemocra­cy think tank as part of the reason for the decline. Also cited was the country’s deep and visceral partisansh­ip.

At times, the skirmishin­g goes beyond parody; it would be funny, if the underlying motive wasn’t so insidious.

In Arizona, which Joe Biden narrowly won, Republican lawmakers approved a pointless recount of Maricopa County ballots, empowering Trump acolytes to pursue goofy theories involving secret watermarks and ballots supposedly flown in from Asia.

(The canvassers, working for a company owned by an advocate of the proTrump “Stop the Steal” campaign, are scouring paper for traces of bamboo, presumably seeing that — in their wacky way of thinking — as a dead giveaway.)

In California, the state is preparing for a Republican­led recall election aimed at ousting Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom about a year ahead of the November 2022 gubernator­ial election. The exercise could cost as much as $400 million.

There are plenty of grievances to lodge against Newsom as the state rises back to its feet, notwithsta­nding his current incarnatio­n as Santa Claus, doling out tens of millions of dollars in goodies from California’s stunning $76-billion surplus.

But the effort to remove him ahead of schedule might have a less partisan odor if a GOP state lawmaker hadn’t begun urging Newsom’s recall even before he took the oath of office. Opponents of the governor finally qualified the measure on their sixth try.

Democratic foes of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker waited a bit longer, a few months after he took office, before launching a petition drive that forced a 2012 vote on his removal. Walker beat the recall and was reelected two years later.

Our system of government strives to give voice and some power to those in the political minority. That’s an important and admirable part of its architectu­re. It’s the reason for the electoral college and why a nation-state like California has the same number of U.S. senators — two — as pint-size states like Wyoming and Rhode Island.

But there is such a thing as tyranny of the minority.

There is danger in a demagogue like Trump undercutti­ng one of the country’s grounding principles to salve his bruised ego, in citizens refusing to acknowledg­e the legitimacy of their government, and in lawmakers granting themselves the power to overturn the decisions of voters if they disagree with their choices.

As David S. Reynolds notes in his epic 2020 biography of Abraham Lincoln, the country’s founders created a representa­tive democracy based on elections. To keep that system functionin­g, Americans have to acknowledg­e and accept the results of those elections, whether they like them or not.

If they’re that unhappy, there’s always the chance to vote the bums out next time.

 ?? Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times ?? THE EX-PRESIDENT and his backers aren’t alone in rejecting election results: Tyranny of the minority also plays out, for example, when losing parties in gubernator­ial races move to recall winners or limit their powers.
Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times THE EX-PRESIDENT and his backers aren’t alone in rejecting election results: Tyranny of the minority also plays out, for example, when losing parties in gubernator­ial races move to recall winners or limit their powers.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States