Los Angeles Times

Rush to inoculate children debated

Risks of COVID shots may outweigh benefits in healthy kids, some vaccine experts say.

- By Melissa Healy

From the earliest days of the pandemic, doctors and public health officials have seen widespread vaccinatio­n as the most effective way to stop COVID-19 in its tracks. But a growing contingent of medical experts is now questionin­g whether that convention­al wisdom ought to apply to children.

Their doubts are not borne of conspiracy beliefs, but couched in the carefully calibrated language of risk and benefit. And they’re expected to get a public airing Friday as advisors to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ponder a spate of post-vaccine heart problems in adolescent­s and young adults.

No one is arguing that COVID-19 immunizati­ons for kids should stop altogether. Rather, a debate has erupted over the need to inoculate healthy children as soon as possible and according to the two-dose regimen authorized by the Food and Drug Administra­tion.

The vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have been administer­ed safely to millions of adults and been vetted in several thousand adolescent­s. But neither has been subjected to exhaustive testing in diverse pediatric population­s, as is typically required for a vaccine intended for universal use in kids.

The FDA authorized the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for emergency use in adolescent­s as young as 12 on May 10. In the weeks that have followed, the safety

monitoring systems managed by the FDA and CDC detected dozens of cases of a possible side effect in newly vaccinated teens: an inflammati­on of the heart muscle known as myocarditi­s.

The cases typically developed in older adolescent­s, most of them boys, three to four days after they got a second dose. Virtually all were considered mild, presenting as chest pain and tightness that resolved after treatment with over-the-counter medication­s. None of the patients appear to have died or suffered serious cardiac malfunctio­n, though it’s too early to know whether they will suffer long-term effects.

As of June 10, the government’s vaccine monitoring systems detected 226 cases of myocarditi­s or a related condition called pericardit­is after vaccinatio­n in people younger than 30. Normally, fewer than 100 cases would be expected for this age group, said Dr. Tom Shimabukur­o, deputy director of the CDC’s Immunizati­on Safety Office.

More investigat­ion is needed to determine whether the vaccine caused these heart problems or if the timing was merely a coincidenc­e, he said.

Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrici­an and vaccine specialist at Children’s Hospital of Philadelph­ia, said the reports will give the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunizati­on Practices an opportunit­y to “give people a clinic on relative risk” — as it did after the COVID-19 vaccine made by Johnson & Johnson was linked to a rare blood-clotting disorder in younger women but still deemed safe for use.

Offit said he doubts the myocarditi­s cases will upend the long-standing certainty that kids should be vaccinated quickly.

“I’d give it to my child in a second,” he said.

Others aren’t so sure. The possibilit­y that children getting the vaccine — especially a second dose — could put their hearts at risk has amplified calls for more debate before parents, schools and others embrace the conviction that all healthy children need to get vaccinated.

It’s not just the prospect of a surprise side effect that has prompted the sudden surge in vaccine caution.

As the pandemic appears to be winding down across the United States and its limited toll on children has been tallied, it’s no longer clear that immunizing children will bring the outbreak to a faster close, said Dr. Martin Makary, a public health expert at Johns Hopkins University.

Makary is urging his colleagues to “think twice” before recommendi­ng universal COVID-19 vaccinatio­n of healthy kids. Given the data in hand, “there’s no compelling case for it right now,” he wrote this month in MedPage, a website widely read by physicians.

In an interview, Makary said his concerns might be allayed with a more thorough examinatio­n of the safety data.

“But no one is thinking like this,” he said. “We’ve converted now from being pro-vaccine to vaccine fanaticism.” Given the general decline in new infections and hospitaliz­ations, there’s time for a thorough FDA vetting of the vaccines for children and adolescent­s, Makary said. Even if it takes months, it could wind up protecting more children from harm.

The emerging debate threatens to divide a community that’s largely been united by the pandemic.

From the moment that the first COVID-19 vaccine started going into Americans’ arms, one certainty has seemed almost beyond questionin­g: As soon as enough doses were available, the nation’s children would roll up their sleeves.

There are strong arguments for that position too.

Although it’s clear COVID-19 has largely spared children from severe illness, the CDC says 456 American kids have died of the disease, though that is considered a conservati­ve estimate.

At least 20,000 — and as many as 100,000 — kids have been hospitaliz­ed with COVID-19. Indeed, the CDC reports that even as adult hospitaliz­ations declined in March and April, the rate at which adolescent­s were admitted ticked upward. Nearly one-third were treated in intensive care units, undercutti­ng the argument that severe illness rarely happens in this age group.

COVID-19’s toll on some children also lingers well beyond a bout of infection. As of mid-May, at least 4,018 in the U.S. have developed a condition called multisyste­m inflammato­ry syndrome in children, or MISC, that frequently appears four to six weeks after a child has cleared his or her infection and typically requires hospitaliz­ation.

Myocarditi­s is common in these very sick children, and roughly 1% die.

If COVID-19 were a disease seen only in children, statistics such as these would galvanize medical profession­als and public health officials to find a way to protect them, New York pediatrici­an Dr. Risa Hoshino wrote in a MedPage commentary sparked in part by Makary’s views.

By any definition, the disease has been an emergency for the nation’s children, and the FDA’s emergency use authorizat­ion is an “appropriat­e pathway” for getting vaccines to young Americans, she added.

At Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, pediatric cardiologi­st Dr. Jodie Votava-Smith has seen the wreckage of COVID-19 firsthand, and she has no doubts about the value of vaccinatin­g kids.

In the last month, she has helped treat a patient who developed myocarditi­s after a dose of vaccine, she said. The child’s symptoms were mild and readily treated with ibuprofen.

Votava-Smith said her assessment of vaccines’ value has been more profoundly shaped by the dozens of children treated at CHLA for serious heart muscle inflammati­on as a result of having COVID-19. These children were severely ill and now face potentiall­y enduring health effects. The disease was the cause of their misery, she said, not the vaccine.

The mother of two children, who are 5 and 7, Votava-Smith said she “can’t wait” to get them vaccinated. “They know they’ll be getting their shot when it’s their turn,” she said.

Dr. H. Cody Meissner, a Tufts University pediatrici­an who advises the FDA on vaccines, said it’s a mistake to evaluate COVID-19 vaccines for children in the same way as it was cleared for emergency use in adults.

“The risk calculatio­n for vaccinatin­g an adult is pretty easy,” he said. When as many as 4,000 adults a day were dying of COVID-19, “even if there was a little risk of vaccine, most people would accept that.”

But for children, he said, “the calculus is a bit different.” Although they seem to contract the coronaviru­s pretty readily, they’re far less likely than adults to get sick or die. So even if instances of post-vaccinatio­n myocarditi­s are rare, they still change the risk-benefit analysis.

“The data are not sufficient to say that the benefit of these COVID-19 vaccines outweighs the risk in children and adolescent­s,” Meissner said. “We may get there. But we’re not there now.”

‘The data are not sufficient to say that the benefit of these COVID-19 vaccines outweighs the risk in children and adolescent­s.’ —

Dr. H. Cody

Meissner, a pediatrici­an who advises the FDA on vaccines

 ?? Gary Coronado Los Angeles Times ?? GUADALUPE CORNEJO is flanked by daughters Estella, 13, left, and Guadalupe, 14, as they register to get COVID vaccinatio­ns in May in Los Angeles. The government says it has detected cases of a possible side effect in newly vaccinated teens: myocarditi­s, a heart problem.
Gary Coronado Los Angeles Times GUADALUPE CORNEJO is flanked by daughters Estella, 13, left, and Guadalupe, 14, as they register to get COVID vaccinatio­ns in May in Los Angeles. The government says it has detected cases of a possible side effect in newly vaccinated teens: myocarditi­s, a heart problem.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States