Los Angeles Times

Race was seen as battle against far right

- By Phil Willon, Taryn Luna and Julia Wick

California Gov. Gavin Newsom survived a historic recall election Tuesday, winning a major vote of confidence during a COVID-19 pandemic that has shattered families and livelihood­s and tested his ability to lead the state through the largest worldwide health crisis in modern times.

The recall offered Republican­s their best chance in more than a decade to take the helm of the largest state in the union. But the effort was undercut when Newsom and the nation’s leading Democrats, aided by visits to California by President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, portrayed the campaign to oust the governor as a “life and death” battle against “Trumpism” and far-right anti-vaccine activists.

Conservati­ve talk show host Larry Elder led the 46 candidates on the second question on the ballot hoping to become governor, but that became meaningles­s after a majority of California voters decided to keep Newsom in office.

Moments after national television networks called the election for Newsom, the governor walked into the California Democratic headquarte­rs in Sacramento to talk with reporters, forgoing a victory celebratio­n as is commonplac­e in traditiona­l campaigns.

Appearing resolute, Newsom cast the rejection of the

recall as a vote in support “of all those things we hold dear as California­ns.” His victory, he said, was a victory for science-based COVID-19 vaccines to end the pandemic and abortion rights for women, as well as economic and racial justice.

“I’m humbled and grateful to the millions and millions of California­ns that exercised their fundamenta­l right to vote and express themselves so overwhelmi­ngly by rejecting the division, by rejecting the cynicism, rejecting so much of the negativity that’s defined our politics in this country over the course of so many years,” Newsom said.

Newsom, 53, spent part of election day at an anti-recall rally in a San Francisco union hall, and warned supporters about the consequenc­es to California’s economy and the public health of its nearly 40 million residents if he was recalled and replaced with Elder, who had vowed to repeal the state’s mask and vaccinatio­n mandates.

“California has outperform­ed Florida, Texas, Indiana, the United States as a whole in not only health outcomes, but economic outcomes,” Newsom told reporters. “Our economy contracted at a more modest rate than those states.”

Newsom also criticized both Elder and former President Trump for saying Tuesday’s election was rigged, calling those unfounded allegation­s a threat to democracy and continuati­on of the “big lie” that the 2020 presidenti­al election was stolen from Trump.

“This election fraud stuff is a crock; it’s shameful. And when I say that, I mean that,” he said.

The mood inside Elder’s official election night party at the Costa Mesa Hilton remained defiant, even after nearly every major news outlet had declared the recall effort dead Tuesday night.

“Let’s be gracious in defeat,” Elder told his supporters a little more than two hours after polls closed. “We may have lost the battle but we are going to win the war.”

At times, Elder’s address resembled his stump speeches with a focus on crime, homelessne­ss, housing and education — and ample shots at Newsom. He ended his speech with a teaser about his plans for California’s 2022 gubernator­ial election.

“As a former radio host, let me just say this: Stay tuned,” Elder said.

For Newsom, the electoral triumph capped an extraordin­ary eight-week fight for his political survival that came less than three years after he won the governor’s office by the largest margin in modern history.

Newsom’s campaign to defeat the recall effort began on an upbeat note, with the governor touting that California was “roaring back” thanks to lower COVID-19 infection rates in the state and efforts to ensure residents got vaccinated. The state’s restrictio­ns and shutdowns were lifted. Baseball stadiums overflowed with fans starting in June, people were dining inside restaurant­s and, Newsom promised, public schools would be open for the new academic year.

Newsom and his political allies had prevented any prominent Democrats from jumping into the field of replacemen­t candidates, eliminatin­g a credible alternativ­e for left-leaning California­ns who may have soured on the governor.

But in late July, just after the recall election was officially certified for the ballot, cause for concern surfaced for Newsom: A poll showed that likely voters in California were almost evenly split over whether to toss the governor out of office, a dire sign in a state where Democratic voters outnumber Republican­s almost 2 to 1.

Political scientist Mindy Romero, director of USC’s Center for Inclusive Democracy, said the lingering aftereffec­ts of Newsom’s COVID-19 policies probably made some voters who supported him in the 2018 election indifferen­t this time around.

She said they held Newsom “at least partially responsibl­e” for the government-mandated restrictio­ns that devastated businesses and forced schoolchil­dren to stay home in distance-learning programs. Under Newsom’s watch, the state also paid out billions of dollars in fraudulent unemployme­nt benefits while at the same time millions of out-of-work California­ns with legitimate claims faced frustratin­g, lengthy delays in receiving their payments.

Romero said Newsom’s most costly mistake came in November when recall supporters were struggling to gather enough petition signatures to qualify for the ballot. Newsom attended a lobbyist’s birthday party at the upscale French Laundry restaurant in the Napa Valley after he had pleaded with California­ns to stay home and avoid multifamil­y gatherings.

Recall proponents seized on that, criticizin­g Newsom as an out-of-touch elitist, and hypocrite, who thought he was above the rules he imposed on other California­ns. Romero said that message was “simple and intuitive for people to understand.” It appealed to voters across the political spectrum and lingers still, she said.

“This never should have gotten close,” Romero said. “This whole process has damaged the governor.”

Dave Gilliard, one of the Republican strategist­s who led the effort to oust the governor, said Newsom was in serious trouble up until August. That changed once Elder emerged as the leading contender to replace Newsom as governor.

“He was in bad shape,” Gilliard said. “Once the focus moved away from Newsom and to his opponent, Elder in this case, his numbers improved greatly. He was able to get Democrats interested again in the election.”

Elder was a perfect foil, Gilliard said. The Republican opposed abortion rights and supported offshore oil drilling, anathema to the state’s Democratic majority. Elder has also been a diehard supporter of Trump, an immensely unpopular figure in California.

Most consequent­ial, Gilliard said, was Elder’s vow to repeal the Newsom administra­tion’s mandates requiring students to wear masks in public schools and teachers, state employees and healthcare workers to be vaccinated. This, at a time when the Delta variant was raging and most California­ns supported Newsom’s actions to stem the spread of the coronaviru­s.

“Elder allowed Newsom to bring Trump back into it, at least Trumpism, when it came to masks and vaccines,” Gilliard said. “When you combine that with the Delta variant, and that people were all of the sudden extremely concerned again about COVID, the timing for Newsom could not have been better.”

At stake was the most powerful elected office in a state of nearly 40 million people, one beset by homelessne­ss, a dire shortage of affordable housing, increases in violent crime and with thousands of businesses that closed or still struggle after statewide shutdowns during the height of the pandemic.

Newsom is the second California governor to have faced a recall election, which was projected to cost $276 million dollars, a price tag blasted by Democrats. In 2003, California voters upset over rolling power outages, budget cuts and a steep increase in vehicle license fees, recalled Democratic Gov. Gray Davis from office and elected actor Arnold Schwarzene­gger, who remains the last Republican to have served as the state’s chief executive.

The spectacle of the 2003 recall election entranced the nation with its only-in-California cast of political candidates, which, along with Schwarzene­gger, included Hustler magazine founder Larry Flynt, Huffington Post cofounder Arianna Huffington and “Diff’rent Strokes” star Gary Coleman.

By comparison, the 2021 sequel fell flat.

Reality television star and former Olympic decathlete Caitlyn Jenner tried to capture some of the Schwarzene­gger magic but did not win over California voters despite her visibility. coverage.

On Tuesday night in San Diego, Cox said he plans to explore running for governor again in 2022.

“Hopes and dreams are dashed by the poor opportunit­ies in this state,” Cox said. “This battle has just begun. This state has to improve … I’m not going to quit. I’m going to stay active.”

Kevin Paffrath, who boasts 1.7 million followers on his YouTube channel, had the highest profile of the little-known Democrats on the ballot, even managing to make it to the stage during one of the candidate debates.

Paffrath, who proposed building a pipeline to the Mississipp­i River to alleviate California’s devastatin­g drought, was expected to have a relatively strong showing in the election, perhaps even challengin­g the success of Republican Kevin Faulconer, the former mayor of San Diego.

 ?? Richard Vogel Associated Press ?? PRO-RECALL voters gather to watch early results of the California election during a party at the Pineapple Hill Saloon & Grill in Los Angeles.
Richard Vogel Associated Press PRO-RECALL voters gather to watch early results of the California election during a party at the Pineapple Hill Saloon & Grill in Los Angeles.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States