Los Angeles Times

The last, best hope against GOP lies

- HARRY LITMAN @HarryLitma­n

The Jan. 6 House Select Committee has only just begun its work and it’s already proving the value of congressio­nal investigat­ions to the country.

The committee was establishe­d against the backdrop of vast gaps in our knowledge about the Capitol attack. It is a national imperative — one that all public leaders should share — to get to the bottom of what happened when thousands of rioters attempted to scuttle a fair election, threatenin­g American democracy itself.

Except all leaders don’t share that goal. Nearly the entire Republican Party attempted to scuttle any inquiry into Jan. 6’s causes, and when that failed, the party refused to participat­e, hoping to demean the investigat­ion as partisan. The only two GOP committee members, anti-Trumpers Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), defied their leaders when they accepted invitation­s to join the inquiry.

In its first public hearing in late July, select committee Chairman Rep. Bennie Johnson (D-Miss.) made it clear that the group’s investigat­ive power, including subpoenas, could and would be used against members of Congress — a departure from past practices — to get the full story on Jan. 6.

A month later, Johnson sent out sweeping requests for documents from federal agencies and ordered phone and social media companies to “preserve the records” of various Republican­s, including the former president, his circle and his family members, who participat­ed in the pre-insurrecti­on “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6 or who may have talked with the president just before, during and after the Capitol attack. Thousands of pages from government archives were turned over Sept. 9, with more to come.

Almost as soon as the committee’s actions were public knowledge, the truth-telling quotient among some members of the GOP improved.

Start with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). Just days after the select committee’s first hearing, a TV interviewe­r asked Jordan if he’d spoken with the president on Jan. 6. The congressma­n bobbed and weaved like a boxer on the ropes. Any conversati­on would have been merely routine: “Yeah, I mean I speak ... with the president all the time. I spoke with him on Jan. 6. I don’t think that’s unusual. I would expect members to talk with the president of the United States when they’re trying to get [things done]. ”

Exactly when, the interviewe­r asked next, did he and Trump talk? Before, during or after the attack?

Jordan went into evasion overdrive: “Uh, I’d have to go, I’d, I, I, I spoke with him that day after, I think after. I don’t know if I spoke with him in the morning or not. I just don’t know. Uh, I’d have to go back and, I mean I don’t, I don’t, I don’t know . ... ”

A month later, not long after the select committee’s phone and social media demands had been publicized, Jordan was much less hesitant. Quoted in Politico, he copped to more than one call with Trump on Jan. 6 and to connecting with the president while hunkered down in a safe room avoiding the marauders.

Why the sudden clarity? Maybe because Jordan realizes he will probably be called to testify, under oath, before the committee and the country. Any discrepanc­y between his public statements and hard evidence — like phone company records — could prove humiliatin­g, not to mention politicall­y dangerous. It might even put him in criminal jeopardy.

This force of legal process is exactly what the country was denied during the Trump era, when the president and his enablers brazenly lied, stonewalle­d and doubled down to evade document requests and testifying under oath. Trump relied on throwing sand into the gears of justice and government bureaucrac­y, maneuverin­g to keep his behavior sealed from scrutiny.

The Jan. 6 committee is playing for keeps, and of course the Biden administra­tion will prove less an executive branch obstacle to investigat­ors. Individual­s may still try to stonewall, but Thompson and the other members show every intention to push past the maneuverin­gs of Republican­s, including Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfiel­d), another Congress member likely to be called as witness.

The House select committee investigat­ing the Capitol attack is playing for keeps against Republican falsehoods and opposition from Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

McCarthy went so far as to threaten the 30 companies, including Apple, AT&T and Verizon, that have been asked to save relevant records of communicat­ions with the president. Turning over such records, McCarthy tweeted, would violate federal law (it wouldn’t). A future Republican majority “will not forget, ” said McCarthy. (“Blatant extortion,” responded one legal scholar.) If McCarthy and other obstructio­nists have their way, we will never know the full story of Jan. 6.

The House select committee isn’t a “partisan sham,” as the former president has charged. It is the best and perhaps last hope we have of countering the GOP’s falsehoods — that there was no insurrecti­on, that the rioters were peaceful protesters and that the only danger to our democracy was a “stolen” 2020 election.

In fact, the committee could achieve a major breakthrou­gh. With the right legal incentives — sweeping informatio­n and document requests and orders, subpoenas issued and enforced, testimony under oath — some of Washington’s biggest liars may meet their match. Americans of all political stripes should champion the effort. A full accounting of Jan. 6 is a core requiremen­t for maintainin­g America’s democracy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States