Reckoning on homelessness

Re “Buscaino’s self-serving motion,” editorial, Oct. 13

The Times Editorial Board criticized Los Angeles City Councilman Joe Buscaino’s motion for a ballot measure to address the crisis on our streets as futile and self-serving. But providing shelter, treatment, and clean and clear sidewalks and parks is not futile. Anything that gets us there should be considered.

And let’s be honest about the log jam at City Hall: An ongoing federal lawsuit, a sheriff crossing jurisdictional lines, several recall threats of sitting councilmembers and four unhoused deaths each day cannot seem to get the city to take the necessary action.

While outreach protocols and the city’s new anti-camping ordinance appear to address some of these issues, we know that they are weak attempts at pretending to do something to stave off voter outrage.

The L.A. Alliance for Human Rights is working for real change. We sued the city and county to create a legally enforceable mandate whereby the community provides beds and services to those ready, willing and able to accept shelter. At the same time, living in public spaces must be forbidden and the laws enforced. This is a balanced social contract to provide for the most vulnerable while removing those who prey on the unhoused and the communities in which they reside.

Next year’s municipal election will be a referendum on the region’s failures on homelessness. The voters know this, and the efforts that candidates take to solve homelessness — including ballot measures — will distinguish the true seekers of change from the defenders of the status quo.

Paul Webster

Los Angeles The writer is executive director of the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights.