Los Angeles Times

Americans increasing­ly divided on race

Democrats’ views have shifted sharply, while Republican­s’ have stayed stable.

- By David Lauter

WASHINGTON — Winning back white, workingcla­ss voters — or at least keeping losses among them from getting worse — obsesses many Democrats, and for good reason.

Former President Obama owed his 2008 and 2012 victories in large part to a decent showing among noncollege-educated white voters in the upper Midwest. Donald Trump’s ability to win over those voters in states such as Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio gained the presidency for him in 2016. And Joe Biden last year regained states that Hillary Clinton had lost in part because of gains among college-educated suburbanit­es , but also because he succeeded in wooing at least some of those non-college voters back to the fold.

As Democrats try to stave off big losses in next year’s midterm election, the question of how to win the loyalties of those voters has become one of their most hotly debated internal issues.

One group argues that Democrats’ best bet is to focus their message on popular economic topics — proposals such as increasing taxes on the wealthy, reducing the price of prescripti­on drugs and expanding healthcare coverage, all of which appeal to a large number of voters of all races, polls show. At the same time, this group argues, Democrats should downplay issues of race and identity, which have much greater potential to divide voters.

Critics of that approach say that ignoring systemic racism would be immoral and wipe out turnout in majority-Black and Latino neighborho­ods.

A major shift among white Democrats

Beyond that moral issue, there’s a practical argument against the idea that Democrats can win by sticking to popular economic themes: Trying to avoid issues of race and identity in politics today is a bit like telling a river to run uphill.

A new study by a team of researcher­s associated with the Democracy Fund’s Voter Study Group dramatical­ly illustrate­s why that’s the case.

The U.S. is in the midst of a remarkable shift in racial attitudes, one that has made the country as a whole significan­tly more aware of the impact of racism and open to dealing with it, but which has also greatly widened the gulf between the parties on racial issues, the study shows.

As a result, attitudes about race and identity aren’t a secondary issue in political life; they’re central to it.

The study, by John Sides of Vanderbilt University, Michael Tesler of UC Irvine and Robert Griffin and Mayesha Quasem of the Democracy Fund’s Voter Study Group, based its conclusion­s on surveys of about 3,300 American voters tracked over the last decade, as well as a larger-scale study that the Democracy Fund did during the 2020 presidenti­al campaign with researcher­s at UCLA.

They measured how Americans responded to a series of questions designed to gauge attitudes about racial discrimina­tion and its impact.

The numbers show that the U.S. is in the midst of an unusual period in politics, said Griffin, the research director for the Voter Study Group.

U.S. attitudes about race clearly changed during the 1960s and 1970s, with the end of legally mandated segregatio­n across the South and the passage of civil rights legislatio­n. But starting in the 1980s, polling data showed little further change.

That stability ended about a decade ago, roughly coinciding with Obama’s first term in office. Since then, the U.S. has seen a rapid shift in views on race, one that accelerate­d during Trump’s tenure.

Most of the change involved Democrats moving to the left. Republican attitudes, which were already significan­tly more conservati­ve than Democrats’ on racial issues, showed little movement. As a result, the gap between the two parties’ voters has widened dramatical­ly.

For example, in 2011, polling found that about a third of Democrats, but fewer than 1 in 10 Republican­s, agreed that “Black people have gotten less than they deserve” in the U.S.

By last year, that 25-point gap between the parties had ballooned to more than 60 points. Republican views shifted little, but the share of Democrats saying Black Americans weren’t getting a fair share grew to roughly 3 out of 4.

Self-defined independen­ts also moved left in their views on race, although not as sharply as Democrats did.

Similar, although slightly smaller, shifts came on other questions, such as whether discrimina­tion and the legacy of slavery make success harder for Black Americans.

Among Democrats, the change in attitudes cut across all racial groups, but the biggest movement came among white Democrats, the numbers show. On each of four questions about attitudes on race that the study tracked, the views of Black and white Democrats are now almost identical.

Latino Democrats did not move as much as the other two groups. A decade ago, their views on average were very similar to those of white Democrats. Now, a significan­t gap exists.

Part of the gap between the parties involves people changing their partisan identity as issues on race have become more prominent: Some people with conservati­ve racial views who used to consider themselves Democrats now identify as Republican­s and vice versa. But because the Voter Study Group tracked the same individual­s over time, its researcher­s can see that even those who stayed consistent in their party identifica­tion shifted their views.

Similar shifts have taken place on other identity-related issues, such as immigratio­n and views about Muslims, the study noted.

Changes track views on Trump

Much of the change in the last several years closely tracked voters’ views of Trump.

Before Trump, recent race-based appeals mostly took subtle forms, the study noted — “dog whistles,” designed to be heard by some and not others.

But Trump “pulled the curtain back,” Griffin said, dropping the code words to exploit racial prejudice and anti-immigrant sentiment explicitly. In that way, Trump “played a clarifying role” for voters on where each party stood.

People often form their views in part as a result of cues they receive from opinion leaders, the study noted. And “cues from enemies can be more important than cues from allies.”

In this case, the intense dislike many Democrats have for Trump appears to have spurred moderate or conservati­ve Democrats into taking more liberal views on race in opposition to him.

That shift has its limits. Views on specific programs, including affirmativ­e action and reparation­s for slavery, for example, have not changed as much as the attitudes about race in principle.

That gap between how people respond on specific programs and what they say about their underlying attitudes could suggest that the shift in views about race is only “superficia­l,” Griffin said. But it’s also possible that programmat­ic views could change more over time, especially if political leaders make those issues a priority.

The study also found that big changes in views toward police and the Black Lives Matter movement that occurred after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapoli­s last year have largely faded, an indication that views on racial issues are malleable, at least for some voters, but that long-term change doesn’t come easily.

Overall, the central role that race and identity play in American life “means our politics may feel more visceral, more emotionall­y intense” than a debate over whether the top income tax rate should be 32% or 39%, Griffin said.

But, he added, for good or ill, the key role those issues play is unlikely to change — however much some Democratic strategist­s might want the party to downplay them.

“The idea that just by messaging you’d be able to move out of this,” Griffin said, “isn’t very reasonable.”

 ?? Alex Brandon Associated Press ?? BIG CHANGES in views toward police and the Black Lives Matter movement that occurred after the murder of George Floyd have largely faded, a study found, an indication that long-term change doesn’t come easily.
Alex Brandon Associated Press BIG CHANGES in views toward police and the Black Lives Matter movement that occurred after the murder of George Floyd have largely faded, a study found, an indication that long-term change doesn’t come easily.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States