Los Angeles Times

VOTERS FED UP ON HOMELESSNE­SS

Most of those polled cite it as a serious problem. Some see it as a quality-of-life issue. Others worry it could happen to them.

- By Benjamin Oreskes and David Lauter

Amid deep frustratio­n over widespread, visible homelessne­ss, Los Angeles voters want the government to act faster and focus on shelter for people living in the streets, even if those efforts are short-term and fall short of permanent housing, a new poll of county voters shows.

Most voters continue to express empathy for homeless people but also impatience and disappoint­ment with the region’s leadership, according to the poll, conducted by the Los Angeles Business Council Institute in cooperatio­n with The Times.

A key finding: Nearly 4 in 10 voters said that homeless people in their neighborho­od made them feel significan­tly unsafe.

Asked to describe their concerns in their own words, voters repeatedly mentioned urine and feces in the streets, a rising sense of disorder, and concern for their children.

“I didn’t feel safe over there, especially raising my children,” said Amber Morino, a 35-year-old student and mother of seven who took part in a focus group done in conjunctio­n with the poll. She moved this year to the San

Fernando Valley from a home in Mar Vista after a camper caught fire near the park where her kids played.

“I am also considerin­g moving out of the state because it’s so bad,” she added. “Like, I just feel like every corner I turn here there are encampment­s — campers. It’s just terrible.”

Just over 1 in 5 voters said they had seriously considered moving because of homelessne­ss in their neighborho­ods.

For many Los Angeles residents, a fear of personally falling into homelessne­ss or knowing someone who will looms large.

Almost 4 in 10 voters said they either have experience­d homelessne­ss or housing insecurity in the last year (11%) or know someone who has (25%).

That rises to almost half of Black voters, reflecting the racial inequity of the homeless population in Los Angeles.

The poll, which surveyed 906 registered voters countywide and has a margin of error of 3.3 percentage points, was designed to update a similar survey conducted by the Los Angeles Business Council and The Times two years ago. The new poll’s findings are broadly consistent with several private polls done in recent months by candidates, advocacy groups and others involved in the region’s debates over how to solve its persistent homelessne­ss problem.

Despite two years of disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, many attitudes about homelessne­ss have not changed.

One that appears to have shifted involves the trade-off between spending money on temporary shelter or longterm housing.

Asked whether officials should focus on “short-term shelter sites” or “long-term housing for homeless people with services,” voters by 57%-30% opted for the shortterm solutions. In a similarly worded question two years ago, opinions were nearly evenly divided.

Many advocates for homeless people cite research that shows people are more likely to stay off the street if they are permanentl­y housed and provided with services to help address physical and psychologi­cal ailments. This sort of housing is in short supply in Los Angeles, and although more is being built, progress has been slow and expensive.

That has led many to say that the city and county cannot wait for enough such housing to be built and must proceed quickly with interventi­ons that get people off the street and into shelters faster.

One thing that stayed constant is that homelessne­ss ranks as the top problem facing the region, with 94% of voters viewing homelessne­ss as a serious or very serious problem.

That’s virtually identical to the level of concern two years ago despite hundreds of millions of dollars of state and federal money that the city and county have spent to deal with homelessne­ss.

Officials have used the money to fund and support thousands of new units of interim housing.

The added capacity has helped support efforts — predominan­tly by city officials — to clear large encampment­s in parks and at other city landmarks such as the Venice boardwalk.

But the region’s voters overwhelmi­ngly said homelessne­ss has gotten worse — 79% said so, compared with 7% who said the situation has improved and 13% who said it has stayed the same.

It’s hard to know the true picture of how many people are homeless currently. The 2020 point-in-time count, mandated by the federal government, found that 66,000 people in the county were homeless. That occurred in January, before the COVID-19 pandemic had come into full force. The 2021 count was canceled. Most experts in the region expect the number to jump when the count is conducted again this winter.

Countywide, pessimists about homelessne­ss outnumber optimists, 44% to 35%.

“I think it ref lects how debilitate­d we all feel,” Mayor Eric Garcetti said in an interview about the poll results.

“How many years and how many new tents — even as we have successes — can we see in a neighborho­od before we feel that we need some short-term places to stabilize people that are on the street?”

The widespread concern — and the deep frustratio­n on the part of many voters — suggests that homelessne­ss will be a top issue for candidates in next year’s elections. L.A. residents will pick a new mayor for the first time in eight years, and voters countywide will choose members of the Board of Supervisor­s.

Lawrence “Drew” Whitlock, a 66-year-old painting contractor who lives in Playa del Rey and was another of the focus group participan­ts, expressed a frustratio­n many voters feel: His truck and his home have been burglarize­d, and he had a knife pulled on him by a homeless person recently, he said.

“I don’t resent them. I want the best for them,” he said of homeless people in his neighborho­od. “I would do whatever I can reasonably to help. But it’s interferin­g with the quality of my life.”

Morino, the student and mom who left Mar Vista, is a former foster care youth who now has four foster children along with two kids she’s adopted and a newborn. She said the children she fostered had been homeless, and she has experience­d housing insecurity as well. For her, homelessne­ss is a “pandemic” that the government has failed to even attempt to cure — one she has seen firsthand.

“A lot of the mayors, governors, city people, they always say, ‘Vote for me, we’re going to get in the office and get the job done. We’re going to clean up this homeless problem, and you’re going to pay this amount of taxes,’ ” she said.

“It’s like nothing has been done. The taxes have increased .... Our politician­s need to step up and take some accountabi­lity for what’s happening in our streets.”

Candidates are keenly aware that homelessne­ss will be top of mind, staking out positions on the issue and, in some cases, preparing ballot measures to highlight their stands.

Almost three-fourths of respondent­s said homelessne­ss should be the most important or a very strong priority for newly elected or reelected officials.

“It’s not just that people aren’t happy with their leaders. It’s that they don’t really even know what they’re doing or who the leader is, who is supposed to do something about this crisis,” said Aileen Cardona-Arroyo, a senior analyst at Hart Research.

Voters are “shaken and upset” and many are “close to the boiling point,” said veteran pollster Peter Hart, who helped oversee the survey. “There’s not a lot of optimism.”

Even with the anger surroundin­g the crisis, respondent­s to the poll appear to have a clear picture of what’s driving thousands of Angelenos to sleep on the streets and who is responsibl­e for addressing the crisis.

The poll showed broad agreement that societal problems — especially a lack of affordable housing and mental health resources — play a major role in homelessne­ss.

Just over 60% of respondent­s said the primary cause of homelessne­ss was either a lack of affordable housing and wages that aren’t keeping up with the cost of living (35%) or a failure to provide access to healthcare for mental and physical illness (27%).

Just 18% said the primary cause of homelessne­ss was a homeless person’s own actions and decisions.

How a voter responded to that question strongly correlated with other views in the survey. Those who blame broad, societal problems for homelessne­ss are significan­tly more likely to support government action to combat it.

Black and Latino voters were most likely to cite the cost of housing and low wages as a prime cause of homelessne­ss. White voters more often cited healthcare. People who identified themselves as conservati­ves were more likely to point to an individual’s own decisions.

Voters also expressed skepticism about clearing encampment­s without offering people a place to go, such as a hotel room or other temporary shelter, and services such as medical care.

A majority, 64%, said that when an encampment is cleared, homeless people are most likely to move to other encampment­s in the region rather than find shelter or permanent housing (19%), or leave the region (10%).

Recent efforts to clear encampment­s have had varying degrees of success in getting people into shelter or housing. Outreach officials have said their ability to get people off the street hinges on the availabili­ty of beds in shelters and hotel rooms, which the city and county rented for homeless people at the outset of the pandemic.

Fifty-two percent of voters said providing services to individual­s living in encampment­s should be a higher priority for officials than clearing encampment­s out of parks and neighborho­ods, favored as the top priority by 39%.

On that question, as with several others, a significan­t difference exists along racial and ethnic lines.

A large majority of Black voters, 66%, said officials should put a priority on providing services, while white voters were more closely divided on the question, 49%40%. Latinos, by 56%-38%, favored providing services. Asian American voters were also closely divided, with 48% favoring clearing camps and 41% for providing services.

Over the last two years, the city has poured tens of millions of dollars into a range of interim housing solutions — some of which are not cheap — and moved forward on designatin­g areas of the city where homeless people cannot sit, lie or sleep outdoors.

Theo Henderson, an activist and creator of the podcast “We the Unhoused,” said he thinks voters’ desire for quick solutions stems partially from their preference to sweep homelessne­ss out of sight. He was encouraged to hear that the poll found that voters felt that broader structural forces were the main reason individual­s became homeless.

His hope was that people would take this knowledge and advocate for less money to be spent on the Los Angeles Police Department and more to be spent on things that help get people out of homelessne­ss.

“They don’t want to see poverty,” he said of many voters. “They need to understand that these problems have been long in the making.”

 ?? Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times ?? A MAN named John packs his belongings before leaving MacArthur Park on Oct. 15 as city officials closed it. In a recent poll, 94% of respondent­s called homelessne­ss a serious or very serious problem.
Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times A MAN named John packs his belongings before leaving MacArthur Park on Oct. 15 as city officials closed it. In a recent poll, 94% of respondent­s called homelessne­ss a serious or very serious problem.
 ?? Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times ?? L.A. VOTERS want officials to act faster on homelessne­ss, even if those efforts are short-term, a poll found.
Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times L.A. VOTERS want officials to act faster on homelessne­ss, even if those efforts are short-term, a poll found.
 ?? David Lauter Los Angeles Times ?? Answers marked "all," "none" or "don't know" were omitted from the graphic. Hart Research for Los Angeles Business Council Institute
David Lauter Los Angeles Times Answers marked "all," "none" or "don't know" were omitted from the graphic. Hart Research for Los Angeles Business Council Institute
 ?? David Lauter Los Angeles Times ?? Answers marked "all," "none" or "don't know" were omitted from the graphic. Hart Research for the Los Angeles Business Council Institute
David Lauter Los Angeles Times Answers marked "all," "none" or "don't know" were omitted from the graphic. Hart Research for the Los Angeles Business Council Institute

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States