Don’t steal from solar customers

Re “Don’t undermine rooftop solar,” editorial, Dec. 6

I installed a rooftop solar system in January 2019 and have enjoyed the benefits since. It hasn’t always been easy, though.

It took Southern California Edison more than three months after it signed off on my installation to begin net energy metering (paying me for the excess energy I send back into the grid). Ultimately, I had to go to the state Public Utilities Commission in order to get some action.

All that time, I was providing free electricity to Edison that it could sell at premium rates. The PUC’s actions got Edison to come up with a reimbursement, but even then the utility would not pay me for the first 45 days of electricity after its go-ahead.

We home solar producers are still liable for monthly connection charges, which in my case average about $30 per month. At the end of each 12-month cycle, Edison is supposed to compensate us for the excess power. The last time I saw a check, the rate was about two cents per kilowatt hour.

Any changes that are made to net energy metering will effectively legalize theft by the utilities on a wide scale.

Burt Hermey Costa Mesa

Thank you for your editorial supporting urban solar.

Along with residential property, Los Angeles has acres upon acres of rooftops on warehouses, parking lots, convention centers, airports, stadiums, minimalls, schools and businesses. Most could support solar panels.

We have no need to string massive transmission lines through our tinderbox forests to bring electricity to the city from faraway power plants. We could use some of the state’s $31-billion surplus to bring Los Angeles to net-zero emissions and save the desert tortoise too. Sarah Starr

Los Angeles

The problem we have transitioning to rooftop solar and other forms of green energy is not the consumer. The government needs to help subsidize the cost.

How can we expect existing utility companies to unilaterally curtail and