Los Angeles Times

Stay home or work sick? Omicron poses conundrum

- By Anne D’Innocenzio and Dee-Ann Durbin

As the Omicron variant of the coronaviru­s infects workers across the nation, millions of those whose jobs don’t provide paid sick days are having to choose between their health and their paychecks.

Although many companies instituted more robust sick-leave policies at the beginning of the pandemic, some have been scaled back since the rollout of vaccines — even though Omicron has managed to evade the shots in some cases. Meanwhile, the labor shortage is adding to the pressure of workers having to decide whether to show up to their jobs sick if they can’t afford to stay home.

“It’s a vicious cycle,” said Daniel Schneider, professor of public policy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. “As staffing gets depleted because people are out sick, that means that those that are on the job have more to do and are even more reluctant to call in sick when they in turn get sick.”

Low-income hourly workers are especially vulnerable. Nearly 80% of private-sector workers get at least one paid sick day, according to a national survey of employee benefits conducted in March by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But only 33% of workers whose wages are at the bottom 10% get paid sick leave, compared with 95% in the top 10%.

A survey in the fall of roughly 6,600 hourly lowwage workers — conducted by Harvard’s Shift Project, which focuses on inequality — found that 65% of workers who reported being sick in the last month said they went to work anyway. That’s less than the 85% who showed up to work sick before the pandemic but much higher than it should be in the middle of a public health crisis. Schneider says the situation could get worse because of Omicron and the labor shortage.

The Associated Press interviewe­d one worker who last month started a job with the state of New Mexico and last week began experienci­ng COVID-19 symptoms. The worker, who asked not to be named because it might jeopardize their employment, took a day off to be tested and two more days to wait for results.

A supervisor called and told the worker they would qualify for paid sick days only if the COVID-19 test is positive. If the test is negative, the worker will have to take the days without pay, since they haven’t accrued enough time for sick leave.

“I thought I was doing the right thing by protecting my co-workers,” said the worker, who is still awaiting the test results and estimates that, if negative, the cost will be $160 per day of work missed. “Now I wish I just would’ve gone to work and not said anything.”

A Trader Joe’s worker in California, who also asked not to be named because they didn’t want to risk their job, said the company lets workers accrue paid time off that they can use for vacations or sick days. But once that time is used up, employees often feel they can’t afford to take unpaid days.

“I think many people now come to work sick or with what they call ‘allergies,’ because they feel they have no other choice,” the worker said.

Trader Joe’s offered hazard pay until last spring, and even paid time off if workers had COVID-related symptoms. But the worker said those benefits have ended.

Other companies are similarly curtailing sick time that they offered earlier in the pandemic.

Kroger, the country’s biggest traditiona­l grocery chain, is ending some benefits for unvaccinat­ed salaried workers in an attempt to compel more of them to get the shots as COVID-19 cases again rise.

Unvaccinat­ed workers enrolled in Kroger’s healthcare plan will no longer be eligible to receive as many as two weeks of paid emergency leave if they become infected — a policy that was put into place last year, when vaccines were unavailabl­e.

Meanwhile, Walmart, the nation’s largest retailer, is slashing pandemic-related paid leave in half — from two weeks to one — after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reduced isolation requiremen­ts for people who don’t have symptoms after they test positive.

Workers have received some relief from a growing number of states. In the last decade, 14 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws or ballot measures requiring employers to provide paid sick leave, according to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es.

On the federal front, however, the movement has stalled.

Congress passed a law in the spring of 2020 requiring most employers to provide paid sick leave for employees with COVID-19-related illnesses. But the requiremen­t expired Dec. 31 of that year. Congress later extended tax credits for employers who voluntaril­y provide paid sick leave, but the extension lapsed at the end of September, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.

In November, the House passed a version of President Biden’s “Build Back Better” plan that would require employers to provide 20 days of paid leave for workers who are sick or caring for a family member. But the fate of that bill is uncertain in the Senate.

“We can’t do a patchwork sort of thing. It has to be holistic. It has to be meaningful,” said Josephine Kalipeni, executive director of Family Values @ Work, a national network of 27 state and local coalitions helping to advocate for such policies as paid sick days.

The U.S. is one of only 11 countries without any federal mandate for paid sick leave, according to a 2020 study by the World Policy Analysis Center at UCLA.

On the flip side are smallbusin­ess owners such as Dawn Crawley, chief executive of House Cleaning Heroes, who can’t afford to pay workers when they are out sick.

But Crawley is trying to help in other ways. She recently drove one cleaner who didn’t have a car to a testing site. She later bought the cleaner medicine, juice and oranges.

“If they are out, I try to give them money, but at the same time, my company has got to survive,” Crawley said. “If the company goes under, no one has work.”

Even when paid sick leave is available, workers aren’t always made aware of it.

Ingrid Vilorio, who works at a Jack in the Box restaurant in Castro Valley, Calif., started feeling sick last March and tested positive for COVID-19.

Vilorio alerted a supervisor, who didn’t tell her she was eligible for paid sick leave — as well as supplement­al COVID-19 leave — under California law.

Vilorio said her doctor told her to take 15 days off, but she decided to take only 10 because she had bills to pay.

Working through Fight for $15, a group that works to unionize fast-food workers, Vilorio and her colleagues reported the restaurant to the county health department. Shortly after that, she was given back pay.

Vilorio said workers are still getting sick and are often afraid to speak up.

“Without our health, we can’t work,” she said. “We’re told that we’re front-line workers, but we’re not treated like it.”

D’Innocenzio and Durbin write for the Associated Press.

 ?? David Zalubowski Associated Press ?? A CORONAVIRU­S test site in Denver. A survey in the fall found that 65% of workers went to work sick.
David Zalubowski Associated Press A CORONAVIRU­S test site in Denver. A survey in the fall found that 65% of workers went to work sick.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States