Los Angeles Times

COVID booster efficacy wanes but remains strong

A CDC report on the Omicron wave finds the shots still protect against acute illness.

-

NEW YORK — An early look at the performanc­e of COVID-19 booster shots during the Omicron wave in the U.S. hinted at a decline in effectiven­ess, though the shots still offered strong protection against severe illness.

The report, published Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is considered an early and limited look at the durability of booster protection as Omicron exploded in December and January before beginning to fade in recent weeks.

“COVID-19 vaccine boosters remain safe and continue to be highly effective against severe disease over time,” said Kristen Nordlund, a CDC spokespers­on.

The researcher­s looked at patient visits to hospitals and urgent care centers in 10 states. They estimated how well the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna booster shots prevented COVID-related visits to emergency department­s and urgent care centers, and how well the vaccines prevented hospitaliz­ations.

About 10% of people in the study were boosted. Vaccine effectiven­ess was higher in people who had received boosters than in people who had received only the original series of shots.

But researcher­s also found that during the time that the Omicron variant has been predominan­t, vaccine effectiven­ess at preventing outpatient visits was 87% in people who had gotten a booster two months earlier, but 66% four months after. Vaccine effectiven­ess against hospitaliz­ation fell from 91% at two months to 78% by the fourth month.

Those results, however, were based on only a small number of patients — fewer than 200 — who had been boosted early. It’s unclear whether those people had gotten boosters early for medical reasons that may have made them more vulnerable to severe illness.

Effectiven­ess after a booster was higher last year, when the Delta variant was causing most U.S. cases, the study noted.

Health experts expect protection from the vaccines to wane. The U.S. booster campaign was based on evidence that emerged last year that vaccine protection was fading six months after people got their initial vaccinatio­ns.

And from the beginning, vaccines have offered less protection against the Omicron mutant than earlier versions of the virus. The study couldn’t address how protection will hold up against the next variant to come along.

Still, the new study’s finding was notable, said Dr. William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University vaccines expert.

“I’m a little surprised, according to the data, that it’s starting to wane already,” he said, adding that he would have anticipate­d higher estimates of vaccine effectiven­ess at the four-month post booster mark.

But Schaffner also said he would like to see more research about the durability of booster protection, adding, “Let’s take this with a grain of salt.”

Dr. Michael Saag, an infectious diseases physician at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, said 78% effectiven­ess against hospitaliz­ation “is still pretty effective.”

“Anecdotall­y, I’m seeing very few people die who got boosted,” he said, even among those with weakened immune systems. “The vaccines are still working.”

 ?? Gary Coronado Los Angeles Times ?? AIRLINE WORKER Brendan Uzoagbado receives a COVID-19 booster vaccinatio­n in December.
Gary Coronado Los Angeles Times AIRLINE WORKER Brendan Uzoagbado receives a COVID-19 booster vaccinatio­n in December.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States