Los Angeles Times

Big Tobacco’s next-level evil

-

Re “George Floyd, Eric Garner, a $40,000 lunch,” May 1

Only a truly bleak satirist could dream up a scheme as cynical as the tobacco industry hiring Black civil rights advocates to help sell products that kill Black people. And with this repulsive twist: using George Floyd and Eric Garner to falsely suggest that cigarettes — particular­ly menthols — go well with antiracism and Black Lives Matter.

That’s deep, in-the-gutter evil. But it’s real.

As The Times’ investigat­ion reveals, the industry has put Black leaders on its payroll for years to block efforts to keep menthol cigarettes out of Black neighborho­ods. They help to push the lie that menthol bans are motivated by racism and pose a police danger for young Black smokers.

Making menthols the favorite among African American smokers is one of Big Tobacco’s oldest and greatest marketing triumphs. Easier to smoke and very hard to quit, menthols are a main reason that tobacco-related illnesses kill a disproport­ionately high number of Black Americans.

It is not lost on many anti-smoking advocates that addiction is akin to enslavemen­t — that African Americans long ago went from picking tobacco to smoking and dying from it.

Your article could have mentioned one more bitter dimension to this story. Everyone who was moved to grief and action by the shocking killings of Floyd and Garner remembers their dying words: “I can’t breathe!” Now think of the many African Americans, sickened to death by their addiction to menthol cigarettes or felled by the coronaviru­s because of smoking-related respirator­y problems, who died with those very words on their lips.

That is the tobacco industry’s murderous gift to us, with help from its many shills in the Black community.

Delmonte Jefferson Durham, N.C. Catherine Saucedo San Francisco The writers are, respective­ly, executive director of the Center for Black Health and Equity, and deputy director of the Smoking Cessation Leadership Center at UC San Francisco.

Thank you for the fascinatin­g reporting on the proposed ban on menthol cigarettes. I wonder where we can find racial justice here.

We can allow Black (and any other) smokers to choose to purchase menthol cancer sticks. That leads to unequal health outcomes across races. Or we can can paternalis­tically override the smokers’ choices because the whole enterprise, with capitalist advertisin­g that addicts and sickens the marginaliz­ed to line the pockets of businessme­n, is corrupt. Then we might start to close the cancer rate gap between white and Black.

But the logic of seeking racial justice will never end. There will always be disparitie­s in health outcomes between groups. Legislatin­g to flatten these disparitie­s can only end in a government micromanag­ement of all our lives.

I had no idea that menthol cigarettes were such an issue before reading this article. I support continuing to sell them, even with all the downsides. John Faucher

Oak Park

The fact that tobacco products, responsibl­e for more than 480,000 deaths annually in the U.S., can be sold legally at all is proof that the Food and Drug Administra­tion is not concerned with protecting consumers.

Bethia Sheean-Wallace Fullerton

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States