Los Angeles Times

What gives on water use?

California­ns were asked to cut back by 15%, but most places are nowhere near that.

- By Jaimie Ding

Almost a year after Gov. Gavin Newsom pleaded with California­ns to voluntary cut their water use by 15% amid a worsening drought, water conservati­on figures are still nowhere near that mark.

Now, as millions across Southern California face unpreceden­ted water restrictio­ns beginning next month, some water experts say that much broader cuts, such as those ordered by former Gov. Jerry Brown during the last drought, are needed to rouse the state from its false sense of water security.

“Even during the last drought, when Gov. Brown asked for voluntary cuts, we didn’t meet those,” said Heather Cooley, director of research at the Pacific Institute, a water think tank in Oakland. “We really need to go toward the mandatory. It really does send a signal that we are all in this together, and that everyone needs to be doing their part.”

Between July — when Newsom urged California­ns to slash water use by 15% — and February, statewide cu mulative water savings have amounted to just 5.8% relative to a 2020 baseline.

Water districts in Northern California, which began experienci­ng severe shortages last year, have done the most to conserve. The Marin Municipal Water District cut use by 28.5% after local reservoirs began to run dry, forcing the water supplier to move to Stage 4 of its drought contingenc­y plan.

The North Coast region also reduced water usage by 14.5% and the San Francisco Bay region by 10.5%.

But in Southern California, which had ample reserves last year, the story has been very different. In

the South Coast hydrologic region, which is home to more than half the state’s population, water use dropped by just 4.6% in the same period, and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power saw just 2.6% cumulative savings.

A few water districts even increased their water usage significan­tly, with El Segundo reporting 44.6% more water since last July.

El Segundo officials say that increase was tied to the disastrous flooding of L.A.’s Hyperion Water Reclamatio­n Plant in July. After debris clogged filtering screens at the Playa del Rey plant, industrial customers that usually used recycled water for cooling had to use potable water for several months, said Elias Sassoon, El Segundo’s director of public works.

After California experience­d its driest ever January, February and March, leaving State Water Project supplies perilously low, officials with the Metropolit­an Water District of Southern California declared unpreceden­ted restrictio­ns that are set to begin next month. Though Cooley said the action may serve as a “wake-up call” for many, it remains to be seen whether the state can change course.

Experts have offered a variety of reasons for California’s lackluster conservati­on efforts.

Some point to the drier-than-usual climate, which caused California­ns to water their lawns and gardens more often than usual at the start of the year.

Cooley and others say the lack of statewide mandatory restrictio­ns on water use, such as those ordered by Brown two years into the last drought, is to blame.

Still others say there’s a psychologi­cal aspect that comes with dealing with drought for an extended period of time.

“We’ve been talking about drought for a really long time at this point, even though we had like a brief little lapse,” said Kelly Sanders, a professor of environmen­tal engineerin­g at USC’s Viterbi School of Engineerin­g.

People are “becoming desensitiz­ed to the severity of the drought. You don’t hear people talking about it quite as much as you did in 2015 and 2016.”

The possibilit­y of your water being shut off is also “less tangible” than something like having your electricit­y going out, Sanders said.

Still, the experts insist a 15% statewide goal is achievable. There remain many opportunit­ies to reduce longterm water use, such as replacing old appliances that use significan­tly more water than ones on the market now, Cooley said.

The Pacific Institute’s research found that urban water use could be decreased by an additional 30% just by adopting current standards for appliance water efficiency. This includes fixing leaky pipes and replacing washing machines and toilets.

Further investment in what is considered more “leading-edge technology” could increase water savings to 48%, Cooley said.

Officials are also targeting lawns as one of the biggest culprits of unnecessar­y water use.

The State Water Resources Control Board is considerin­g a ban on the irrigation of turf on industrial, commercial and institutio­nal properties like schools and hospitals, “where that turf is not serving a functional purpose,” said James Nachbaur, director of research, planning and performanc­e at the state water conservati­on agency.

This would not affect individual homeowners, parks or other areas where people are actively using the turf, Nachbaur said.

Many water suppliers around the state also offer various rebates for replacing lawns with drought-tolerant gardens or standard sprinkler systems with drip irrigation, which use 20% to 50% less water than sprinklers. The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has offered a $3 rebate per square foot of turf for up to 5,000 square feet since 2019.

Changing a landscape is still a “relatively easier way” to become more efficient in our water use than tackling indoor water use, which has already been dropping over time in California and continues to decline, Nachbaur said.

Despite the slow progress in water conservati­on so far, Nachbaur believes the actions by the water board and local suppliers as well as ramped-up messaging campaigns build on each other and are “adding up to more cumulative awareness of drought.”

The MWD approved a nearly $11-million media campaign in hopes of capturing people’s attention amid a “dizzying” news cycle, according to the board’s chief operating officer, Deven Upadhyay.

There’s a cultural resistance, however, to these kinds of changes, experts say. The verdant lawns and expansive yards are certainly an object of American obsession, a trademark of home ownership and the subject of inspection by homeowners associatio­ns, nosy neighbors and the like.

“For a very, very long time, we’ve kind of told everybody that you can have whatever kinds of plants that you want,” Sanders said. “We’re just going to have to get used to a landscape that looks a little bit more native to Southern California and its current climate, you know. The times of big, lush, green lawns might be limited.”

‘Even during the last drought, when Gov. Brown asked for voluntary cuts, we didn’t meet those.’

— Heather Cooley, director of research at the Pacific Institute, a water think tank in Oakland

 ?? Francine Orr Los Angeles Times ?? SCOTT MOSES waters f lowers in his frontyard in South Pasadena. Many water suppliers are offering rebates for replacing lawns with drought-tolerant gardens.
Francine Orr Los Angeles Times SCOTT MOSES waters f lowers in his frontyard in South Pasadena. Many water suppliers are offering rebates for replacing lawns with drought-tolerant gardens.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States