Los Angeles Times

Keeping track of the Omicron subvariant­s

The ABCs of BA.1, BA.2.12.1, etc.: Experts explain the mutations, the effects and what’s to come

- By Louis Jacobson Jacobson writes for PolitiFact.

Two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, Americans can be forgiven if they’ve lost track of the latest coronaviru­s variants circulatin­g nationally and around the world.

We’ve heard of the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron variants, but a new Greek-letter variant hasn’t come onto the scene in almost half a year. Instead, a seemingly endless stream of “subvariant­s” of Omicron has emerged in the last few months.

How much do they differ from one another? Can an infection caused by one subvariant protect someone from an infection caused by a different subvariant? And how well do COVID-19 vaccines — which were developed before Omicron’s emergence — protect against the subvariant­s?

We asked medical and epidemiolo­gical experts to weigh in on these questions and other matters around the subvariant­s.

What are the difference­s among the subvariant­s?

The Omicron subvariant­s seem like an alphabet soup of letters and numbers.

The original Omicron variant was called B.1.1.529. It begat such subvariant­s as BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.3 and the most recent, BA.4 and BA.5.

“They all differ from each other by having different mutations in the spike protein,” said Dr. Monica Gandhi, a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco, referring to the part of the virus that penetrates host cells and causes infection.

The minor to modest mutations in these subvariant­s can make them marginally more transmissi­ble from person to person.

Generally, the higher the number following “BA” in the name, the more transmissi­ble the subvariant. For instance, BA.2 is thought to be about 30% to 60% more transmissi­ble than its predecesso­rs.

These mutations have enabled subvariant­s to spread widely, only to be overtaken by a slightly more transmissi­ble subvariant within a few weeks. Then the process repeats.

In the United States, for example, BA.1.1 was dominant in late January, having overtaken the initial variant, B.1.1.529. But by mid-March, BA.1.1 began losing ground to BA.2, which became dominant by early April. By late April, another subvariant — BA.2.12.1 — was gaining steam, accounting for almost 29% of infections, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

(The Delta wave of late 2021 was not a factor during this time frame.)

What about the severity of illness?

The illnesses caused by Omicron have typically been less severe than those caused by previous variants — a pattern that seems to hold for all the subvariant­s studied so far.

One analysis from Denmark showed that BA.2 doesn’t cause more hospitaliz­ations than BA.1, Gandhi said.

Even the most recent subvariant­s that have been discovered, BA.4 and BA.5, show “no evidence to suggest that it is more worrisome than the original Omicron, other than a potentiall­y slight increase in transmissi­bility,” said Brooke Nichols, an infectious-disease mathematic­al modeler at Boston University.

Dr. Dennis Cunningham, the system medical director of infection control and prevention at Henry Ford Health in Detroit, told NBC News that the symptoms from the Omicron subvariant­s “have been pretty consistent. There’s less incidence of people losing their sense of taste and smell. In a lot of ways, it’s a bad cold: a lot of respirator­y symptoms, stuffy nose, coughing, body aches and fatigue.”

Does one subvariant protect against others?

With all variants seen so far, the ability of the virus to evade existing immune protection “is only partial, much like it is for the seasonal flu,” said Colin Russell, a professor of applied evolutiona­ry biology at the University of Amsterdam’s medical center.

Although some people who contracted BA.1 have also gotten BA.2, the initial research suggests that infection with BA.1 “provides strong protection against reinfectio­n with BA.2,” the World Health Organizati­on has said.

“This may explain why our BA.2 surge in the U.S. was not that large as the very large BA.1 surge over the winter,” Gandhi said.

The level of protection can vary depending on how sick you were, with mild cases boosting immunity for perhaps a month or two and recovery from a severe illness boosting it for as long as a year.

How do the COVID-19 vaccines stack up?

Although the vaccines and boosters aren’t quite as successful in protecting against Omicron as they are against earlier variants, they will generally protect people from severe disease if they become infected with one of the new subvariant­s.

“We’re steady as she goes with the vaccines we’re using,” said Dr. William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine and health policy at Vanderbilt University. “I have not seen a single study from the field that shows a substantia­l distinctio­n between the vaccine responses to Omicron subvariant­s.”

The vaccines generate what are known as memory B cells and have been shown to recognize different variants as they emerge, Gandhi said. The vaccines also trigger the production of T cells, which protect against severe disease, she said.

“While B cells serve as memory banks to produce antibodies when needed, T cells amplify the body’s response to a virus and help recruit cells to attack the pathogen directly,” Gandhi said.

The result is that a breakthrou­gh infection for a vaccinated individual “should remain mild with the subvariant­s,” she said.

The wide spread in the U.S. of a relatively mild strain of the virus probably paid dividends by providing many Americans with some immunity, regardless of whether they had been vaccinated. Research shows that people who had been vaccinated and then were infected had even greater protection than people who had been vaccinated and not infected.

“This family of Omicron could indeed offer a bright side” in the course of the pandemic, Schaffner said.

Looking ahead, vaccine manufactur­ers are beginning to design vaccines that specifical­ly target Omicron, and some would combine a coronaviru­s vaccine with a seasonal influenza vaccine in one shot. But these vaccines are in the early stages; Schaffner said he suspects they won’t be ready and approved by this fall’s flu vaccinatio­n season.

Whether such vaccines represent the next step in the fight against COVID will be up to the CDC and the Food and Drug Administra­tion.

Are any entirely new variants on the horizon?

Experts agree that the only newcomers in recent weeks have been incrementa­l subvariant­s — certainly nothing as game-changing as Delta or Omicron were when they first appeared.

“There’s nothing we know of that’s lurking yet, and the surveillan­ce is pretty darn aggressive,” Schaffner said.

There are estimates that more than 60% of the world’s population has been exposed to Omicron, and more than 65% of the world’s population has received at least one dose of the vaccine, Gandhi said, “so I am keeping my fingers crossed the developmen­t of new variants will slow with this degree of population immunity.”

Gandhi acknowledg­ed some surprise that there don’t appear to be new variants on the horizon, but she sees this as a positive developmen­t.

“We have now gone five months since hearing about a new variant, which I hope is ref lective of increasing immunity in the world’s population,” she said.

 ?? Andy Wong Associated Press ?? RESIDENTS of Beijing are tested for the coronaviru­s. Recent subvariant­s show no evidence to suggest that they are “more worrisome than the original Omicron,” said Brooke Nichols, an infectious-disease mathematic­al modeler at Boston University.
Andy Wong Associated Press RESIDENTS of Beijing are tested for the coronaviru­s. Recent subvariant­s show no evidence to suggest that they are “more worrisome than the original Omicron,” said Brooke Nichols, an infectious-disease mathematic­al modeler at Boston University.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States