Los Angeles Times

CONVERSATI­ON WITH THE EXPERTS LABOR & EMPLOYMENT

The Labor & Employment Q&A section is produced by the L.A. Times B2B Publishing team in conjunctio­n with Lathrop GPM LLP.

- Laura Reathaford Partner Lathrop GPM LLP laura.reathaford@lathropgpm.com lathropgpm.com Caroline Sayers Counsel Lathrop GPM LLP caroline.sayers@lathropgpm.com lathropgpm.com

With the many unpreceden­ted operationa­l changes and adjustment­s that businesses in every sector have had to make over the last two years, a whole new landscape has emerged in terms of labor and employment issues. This has left even the most seasoned human resources and C-suiters struggling to find answers to crucial questions. Are the changes that have emerged trend-driven or here to stay? What should management be focusing on in terms of new standards and laws pertaining to employee relations?

To address these issues and concerns, as well as many other topics pertaining to labor and employment hot buttons, the Los Angeles Times B2B Publishing team turned to two uniquely knowledgea­ble experts from Lathrop GPM LLP for their thoughts and the most important “need-to-know” insights and to get their assessment­s regarding the current state of labor legislatio­n, the new rules of hiring and firing in the wake of the pandemic crisis, and the various trends that they have been observing in general.

Q: WHAT WERE THE MOST MEANINGFUL CHANGES TO LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW AND POLICY LAST YEAR?

A: Reathaford & Sayers

The provision of COVID supplement­al sick pay was a significan­t change in employment policy. This law essentiall­y shifted the burden from the government to California businesses to cover wages for employees by requiring the employer to provide up to 80 hours of paid leave to employees affected by COVID. On the federal level, limiting sexual harassment claims from arbitratio­n agreements was also significan­t. On March 3, 2022, the Ending Forced Arbitratio­n of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 took effect. This law amends the Federal Arbitratio­n Act (FAA) and prohibits employers from requiring employees to resolve sexual harassment and sexual assault claims through private arbitratio­n unless the employee (after the claim arises) voluntaril­y chooses arbitratio­n. As a result, even if the employee has previously signed an agreement to arbitrate employment law claims, the employee may now choose to pursue sexual harassment or sexual assault claims in court instead of arbitratio­n.

Q: AS WE MOVE DEEPER INTO 2022, WHAT ARE THE LABOR LAW HOT ISSUES TO BE AWARE OF?

A: Reathaford & Sayers

There is a proposed ballot initiative that seeks to repeal California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) and replace it with a new law called the California Fair Pay and Employer Accountabi­lity Act of 2022. Since 2004, PAGA has appointed private litigants to step into the shoes of the Labor Commission­er and act as “Private Attorneys General” in order to collect civil penalties for purported violations of the California Labor Code. If a plaintiff is successful in recovering sums under PAGA, the employee receives 25% of the penalties collected, and the government receives the other 75%. In addition, plaintiffs’ attorneys can, and almost always do, receive their attorney’s fees in an amount that is generally 1/3 of the overall recovery. The proposed new law would effectivel­y put the recovery of civil penalties back in the hands of the Labor Commission­er because, over the years, plaintiffs’ lawyers have been able to collect exorbitant fees, often for doing little more than filing a boilerplat­e lawsuit and attending a mediation. California lawmakers are also proposing a 32-hour, four-day workweek for private sector employers with more than 500 employees. This initiative is proposed and still many steps away from being passed. However, if passed, it could affect more than 2,000 California businesses.

Q: DO YOU THINK THE LABOR SHORTAGE ISSUES THAT HAVE EMERGED OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS ARE TEMPORARY OR IS IT A LONGTERM CHALLENGE? WHY?

A: Reathaford & Sayers

There is no easy answer to this question since the decision to return to work varies from person to person. That said, we are seeing an uptick in employment for several reasons: (1) employees have used up their savings during the “great resignatio­n” period; (2) employees who attempted to start/create their own business during the pandemic have not been as successful as they would have liked; (3) government benefits have run out; (4) employers are paying higher wages; (5) employers are providing more flexibilit­y regarding the availabili­ty of remote work; and (6) companies are learning how to manage COVID risks. For these reasons, we believe that the labor shortage is temporary.

Q: WHAT IS YOUR ADVICE TO COMPANIES WHO WANT TO IMPLEMENT MANDATORY VACCINES FOR EMPLOYEES?

A: Reathaford & Sayers As with any company policy, it is important for employers to communicat­e it effectivel­y and apply it consistent­ly. As we have seen, vaccinatio­ns are very controvers­ial, and many employees have raised concerns based on religious and medical objections. When faced with these objections, employers should seek the advice of counsel to determine whether the objections have merit and/or can be accommodat­ed.

Q: WHAT TRENDS ARE YOU SEEING RELATED TO ARBITRATIO­N AGREEMENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT? A: Reathaford & Sayers

In addition to the limitation of sexual harassment and sexual assault claims from arbitratio­n agreements (discussed above), the United States Supreme Court is currently considerin­g whether wage-and-hour claims brought under PAGA could be compelled to arbitratio­n pursuant to a duly executed arbitratio­n agreement. Since 2014, PAGA claims were immune from arbitratio­n based on the California Supreme court’s decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transporta­tion Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348 (2014). A decision on this issue is expected from the United States Supreme Court no later than July 2022. There is industry speculatio­n that Congress may pass additional laws further limiting arbitratio­n agreements beyond the sexual harassment and sexual assault claims to race-based discrimina­tion and other employment claims.

Q: WHAT EFFECT DOES THE INCREASING NUMBER OF MILLENNIAL­S HAVE ON A COMPANY’S APPROACH TO EMPLOYEE RELATIONS?

A: Reathaford & Sayers

Millennial­s are now moving into management roles at many companies and have an opportunit­y to change company culture. Millennial­s are known for valuing transparen­cy, trusting employees to work – and be productive – from anywhere, and knowing that their company and what they do in it has a positive impact on the greater good. As managers, they will now have more influence over these values. Accordingl­y, companies must learn to embrace these values at the management level and not simply at the employee level.

Q: WHAT KEEPS YOU UP AT NIGHT?

A: Reathaford & Sayers

What keeps us up at night is the constant uncertaint­y employers face trying to manage employees in California. Anti-discrimina­tion laws are changing on what seems to be an almost daily basis and are now targeting employee “bad behavior” instead of illegal discrimina­tion. COVID-related disputes are starting to percolate and have created a tidal wave of litigation including, without limitation, the Labor Commission­er’s issuance of severe penalties for purported non-compliance with California’s COVID supplement­al sick leave

Millennial­s are now moving into management roles at many companies and have an opportunit­y to change company culture.”

– Reathaford & Sayers

In these uncertain times, employers are relying more heavily on law firms that can provide advice and counseling services in order to avoid litigation before it begins.”

– Reathaford & Sayers

laws. Next, companies are struggling to balance a strong collaborat­ive culture with remote work. Employees have become accustomed to working remotely and this has stalled the integratio­n of newly hired employees. Finally, it appears that unions are enjoying a resurgence largely due to the fact that employees demand more flexibilit­y and protection. According to an October 2021 Time magazine article, “Employees have been emboldened by a series of related events: soaring company profits, a renewed respect for essential workers and rekindled political will in Washington. Plus, there’s the hard truth of today’s labor market: Companies in many industries are finding employees downright impossible to replace.” All of these issues are creating an uncertain future for employers, making it harder for them to plan and manage their businesses.

Q: HOW DOES A LAW FIRM SPECIALIZI­NG IN LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT DIFFERENTI­ATE ITSELF FROM THE COMPETITIO­N IN 2022?

A: Reathaford & Sayers Lathrop GPM believes that it is imperative for employment lawyers to stay current with the ever-changing laws and trends, especially in the wake of the “me too movement,” COVID, and the new legislativ­e hostility towards arbitratio­n agreements in the employment context. Because of the constantly changing laws, it is also important for employment lawyers to embrace and provide employment counseling services. In these uncertain times, employers are relying more heavily on law firms that can provide advice and counseling services in order to avoid litigation before it begins. While the economics of law firm advice work may not seem lucrative at first blush, advice and counseling services are invaluable to clients. Thus, law firms can easily differenti­ate themselves by making employment advice and counseling work a priority. Finally, and in order to be an effective counselor, employment lawyers must have a profound understand­ing of their clients’ industries. In Lathrop GPM’s opinion, employment lawyers provide the most value when they are deeply entrenched in their clients’ businesses. This differenti­ator allows firms like us to predict areas of potential exposure and mitigate potential risks.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States