Los Angeles Times

NASA will study unidentifi­ed you-know-whats

Mysterious flying objects are now called UAPs, and the space agency wants answers.

- By Corinne Purtill

NASA announced Thursday that it’s embarking on a new study of unidentifi­ed aerial phenomena, or UAPs — the term now used in scientific and military circles for the inexplicab­le airborne sightings commonly known as UFOs.

The study, which will launch this fall, is a direct acknowledg­ment from the space agency that there are in fact things flying around our skies that can’t yet be ascribed to known technologi­es or natural phenomena.

To be clear: NASA isn’t saying these mysterious sightings are evidence of extraterre­strial life, said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administra­tor of NASA’s Science Mission Directorat­e. The point is that whatever the truth may be, scientists should be able to pursue it as rigorously as any other question without having their reputation (or sanity) questioned.

“In a traditiona­l type of science environmen­t, talking about some of these issues may be considered selling out, or talking about things that are not actual science,” Zurbuchen said. “I just really vehemently oppose that.”

Don’t expect any definitive explanatio­ns from the initial study, which will be released to the public upon completion next year. With a budget of less than $100,000 and time frame of just nine months, the independen­t study team will look at which of NASA’s vast existing data sources are most relevant to this question, and what data it should collect in the future. Astrophysi­cist David Spergel of the Simons Foundation, a private research foundation, will lead the study.

The goal, Zurbuchen said, is to “take a field that is relatively data-poor and make it into a field that is much more data-rich, and therefore worthy of scientific investigat­ion and analysis.”

Formal data on UAP remains scarce in part because admitting a scientific interest in the subject — or to having possibly observed the phenomena in the field — has carried some reputation­al risk. Insisting that one has personally seen a UFO has not traditiona­lly been a path to career advancemen­t in either the military or the scientific community.

But as the subject has been more openly discussed at high levels in the U.S. government, more people have been willing to step forward with accounts of things they’ve seen that defy logic or experience.

Between 2004 and 2021, the U.S. Navy’s Unidentifi­ed Aerial Phenomena Task Force investigat­ed 144 incidents of UAP spotted by military pilots, according to a report released last year by the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligen­ce. Of those, investigat­ors were able to definitive­ly identify only one, a def lating balloon.

In May, Congress held its first public hearing on UAP in more than 50 years. Pentagon officials told lawmakers that since the report’s publicatio­n, military pilots had come forward with hundreds more sightings, bringing the total number of incidents under investigat­ion to 400.

One of those documented sightings is a 2004 event witnessed off the Southern California coast known in aviation circles as “the Tic Tac incident.”

Navy pilots on a training mission first noticed unusual choppiness in the water. They looked up to see a smooth, white, oblong object gliding over the sea. The event was captured on video and by multiple radars.

“I don’t identify as a UFO person,” one of the witnesses, retired U.S. Navy Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich, told Reuters in 2021. “We don’t know what it was, but it could have been a natural phenomenon in human activity. But the point was that it was weird, and we couldn’t recognize it.”

The more people talk about UAP, scientists and military officials hope, the closer we can get to explaining them — and to mitigating any risk they might pose.

Any rogue object in the air — a drone, a bird or an errant balloon — could be a threat to aircraft safety. And Pentagon officials are at least as concerned that some of the unusually shaped, unnaturall­y behaving objects their pilots have seen are new technologi­es from China, Russia or other Earth-bound adversarie­s as they are about alien life.

“There is a great deal of stigma associated with UAP among our naval aviators and aviation communitie­s,” said Daniel Evans of NASA’s Science Mission Directorat­e, who will direct the agency’s part in the study. “One of the things that we tangential­ly hope to do as part of this study, simply by talking about it in the open, is to help to remove some of the stigma associated with it. And that will yield increased access to data, more reports, more sightings, etc.”

NASA said there was “no evidence” that UAPs are the result of extraterre­strial life. But the agency is also not ruling anything out.

“If somebody asked me, ‘Do I really think that there is irrefutabl­e evidence for intelligen­t life here?’ ... I would give an answer that’s absolutely acceptable as a scientist,” Zurbuchen said. “Which is: I don’t know.”

 ?? Alex Brandon Associated Press ?? DEPUTY DIRECTOR of Naval Intelligen­ce Scott Bray points to a video display of a UAP during a House hearing last month. UAP data are scarce because admitting interest in the subject can put a reputation at risk.
Alex Brandon Associated Press DEPUTY DIRECTOR of Naval Intelligen­ce Scott Bray points to a video display of a UAP during a House hearing last month. UAP data are scarce because admitting interest in the subject can put a reputation at risk.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States