Los Angeles Times

Childcare aid seen as helpful

Mothers and the economy would reap benefits, a study says.

- By Catarina Saraiva and Olivia Rockeman Saraiva and Rockeman write for Bloomberg.

Subsidizin­g child care, a key part of President Biden’s pandemic recovery legislatio­n that has so far failed to pass into law, would increase the number of mothers in the workforce and boost wages for industry workers, among other social and economic benefits, according to a new study.

For households making up to 250% of the national median income — which is $90,657 for a family of four — a federal program that would cover child-care costs exceeding 7% of that family’s income would boost mothers’ employment by 6 percentage points, and 10 percentage points for those working full time, economists led by Jonathan Borowsky, a postdoctor­al associate at the University of Minnesota, said in a paper.

“The model estimates suggest that expansion of child-care subsidies would mitigate family income gaps in access to licensed care facilities, moving families from unlicensed care to centerbase­d care in particular,” according to the paper circulated by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

“These shifts also facilitate meaningful increases in maternal employment and imply improvemen­ts in the quality of care experience­d by children.”

The U.S. is an outlier among wealthy nations in not guaranteei­ng child-care assistance for working parents — a problem exacerbate­d by the pandemic in driving up already-high facilities costs, affecting children’s preparedne­ss for school and forcing more women out of the labor force than men. Lawmakers have proposed various ideas to help bolster the industry, though none have yet succeeded.

The paper’s authors created three models, each reflecting different degrees of subsidies, based on existing legislatio­n. The broadest, which includes capping the amount of money a family spends on child care at 7% of income, is based on Biden’s proposal in the Build Back Better Act. In that scenario, the gains in the job market would be driven by low-income mothers, whose fulltime employment would probably increase by 18.2 percentage points.

Some 68% of U.S. mothers with children ages 3 to 5 are employed, only higher than eight other countries out of 40 in the Organizati­on for Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t, the authors found. A broad expansion in child-care subsidies would increase that share to 78%, which would catapult the U.S. into ninth place in mothers’ employment among the richest nations.

By increasing demand for the services, child-care subsidies would boost wages for industry workers, who make an average $12.12 per hour and are disproport­ionately women of color. Wages could increase as much as 29% for teachers with a bachelor’s degree and 14% for those without one.

Although some legislatio­n includes a wage floor, or a minimum-wage level, for the child-care workforce, the authors found it wouldn’t necessaril­y be needed because market forces would push wage increases close to that of the prescribed floor.

Child-care workers have been slow to return to the industry since the pandemic. The availabili­ty of higher pay in other jobs has led many of the workers to leave the industry altogether.

Although federal subsidy programs exist, inadequate funding means they reach only a fraction of eligible children, the authors found.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States