Los Angeles Times

Senate clears a key hurdle, votes to start gun debate

14 Republican­s join Democrats to advance a bill to tighten background checks.

- By Jennifer Haberkorn

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Tuesday evening to start debate on a bipartisan effort to combat gun violence, a sign of progress for what could be the most substantia­l gun policy to get through Congress in more than three decades.

The procedural vote was approved 64 to 34, with 14 Republican­s joining all members of the Democratic caucus to advance the bill. Two Republican­s did not vote.

By clearing the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome any filibuster, the measure seems assured final passage, assuming there are no last-minute vote changes.

The bill would increase background checks for would-be gun buyers ages 18 to 21 by providing law enforcemen­t more time to do the checks and incentiviz­ing states to provide juvenile records for the analysis.

It would close the “boyfriend” loophole by prohibitin­g anyone convicted of abuse against a spouse or domestic partner from buying a gun.

The plan would crack down on gun traffickin­g and straw purchases as well as fund $750 million to incentiviz­e states to create “red flag” laws that would allow weapons to be temporaril­y taken away from people who show a risk of violence against themselves or others.

There is also about $15 billion for mental health programs and school safety.

The bipartisan negotiator­s finalized the bill text just hours before the vote, following nearly a month of negotiatio­n. Final talks centered around the closure of the “boyfriend” loophole and defining a romantic relationsh­ip. The final text says the relationsh­ip must be romantic or intimate in nature, not business or casual “acquaintan­ceships.”

Lawmakers are hoping to get through a series of votes on the bill by the end of the week and the start of a twoweek recess.

The legislatio­n is far from what President Biden and many Democrats hoped to see in a gun bill, such as a ban on assault rifles.

But Sen. Christophe­r S. Murphy (D-Conn.), who led the negotiatio­n for Democrats, praised it because he said it “will save countless lives and finally break a 30year political logjam” on a contentiou­s policy issue.

Sen. John Cornyn (RTexas), who led the debate for Republican­s, said they “have found some areas where there’s space for compromise.”

But in a sign of the political tension surroundin­g any Republican who supports a gun measure, Cornyn was loudly booed at his state’s GOP convention over the weekend because of his work on the bill.

The National Rifle Assn. came out against the legislatio­n, saying it “does little to truly address violent crime while opening the door to unnecessar­y burdens on the exercise of 2nd Amendment freedom by law-abiding gun owners.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) spoke against that idea, saying the legislatio­n is “a common-sense package of popular steps that will help make these horrifying incidents less likely while fully upholding the 2nd Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.”

The back-to-back mass shootings last month in Buffalo, N.Y., and Uvalde, Texas, generated a rare opening for the bipartisan negotiatio­ns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States