Los Angeles Times

Measure would strengthen reproducti­ve rights in L.A.

- By Alexandra E. Petri

Los Angeles City Atty. Mike Feuer is proposing a law to strengthen reproducti­ve rights and to position the city as a haven for those seeking abortion services.

Feuer said the draft legislatio­n would prohibit any pregnancy center from misreprese­nting the services it performs. The proposed law would also provide women and others legal recourse if they are misled.

“When it comes to reproducti­ve choice, time matters,” Feuer said at a news conference on Thursday. “When it comes to reproducti­ve choices, truth matters.”

States around the country are restrictin­g or prohibitin­g abortion access, making California and Los Angeles County a critical destinatio­n for some in the post-Roe vs. Wade era, Feuer said.

According to a UCLA study in June, up to 16,000 more people are expected to travel to California each year for abortion care, with more than half likely to end up in Los Angeles County.

To aid those seeking help, the draft legislatio­n would ban clinics from making false advertisin­g statements or misleading potential clients about the services they provide.

Although it applies to any business offering pregnancy-related care, the proposed law is largely aimed at providers known as crisis pregnancy centers, which are often religiousl­y affiliated and opposed to abortion. These crisis centers are commonly near or otherwise resemble reproducti­ve health clinics and often deceive people by falsely advertisin­g full reproducti­ve care, including abortion.

Many centers are typically staffed by untrained or unlicensed volunteers and employees, resulting in incomplete or inaccurate informatio­n that limits people from making grounded and timely choices about their reproducti­ve care. Those who seek care at crisis pregnancy centers are often in distress, and they tend to be disproport­ionately young, poorly educated or poor, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a reproducti­ve health research group that supports abortion rights.

“After the overturn of Roe vs. Wade, I am even more concerned that these centers will feed on the vulnerabil­ity of these patients and that women will be told that abortion care isn’t an option, forced to give birth to a child that they cannot afford to care for,” said Nury Martinez, Los Angeles City Council president, who in 2016 introduced a motion calling attention to the issue with crisis centers.

There are an estimated five crisis pregnancy centers in Los Angeles, Feuer said.

In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked enforcemen­t of a 2015 California law, known as the Reproducti­ve Fact Act, that required faithbased crisis pregnancy centers to notify patients that the state offers subsidized medical care, including abortions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States