Los Angeles Times

Democracy’s survival depends on fighting demagogues

- By Eli Merritt Eli Merritt is a psychiatri­st and political historian at Vanderbilt University. He writes the Substack newsletter American Commonweal­th.

The House select committee’s investigat­ion of the Jan. 6 insurrecti­on has hammered home a fundamenta­l truth about democracy. This cherished form of government, rooted in the will of the people, can be upended by demagogues when political party gatekeeper­s do not block their ascent to power.

When gatekeeper­s fail in this critical duty, democracie­s deteriorat­e in a process well-known to political philosophe­rs throughout history, including Alexander Hamilton. As he wrote in Federalist No. 1, such individual­s achieve elected power by manipulati­ng and dividing the people, “commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants.”

In other words, the first step in democratic breakdown is the election of a demagogue to power. Such a person, as Eric A. Posner explains in “The Demagogue’s Playbook,” is one “who obtains the support of the people through dishonesty, emotional manipulati­on, and the exploitati­on of social divisions; who targets the political elites, blaming them for everything that has gone wrong; and who tries to destroy institutio­ns — legal, political, religious, social — and other sources of power that stand in their way.”

Once in office, the demagogue devolves into an authoritar­ian who subverts the government, corrupting and dismantlin­g the democracy itself to retain power.

Donald Trump started out as a demagogue, and, as the recent House hearings show, he slid deep into authoritar­ianism, orchestrat­ing an aggressive multifacet­ed campaign to overturn a free and fair election. What the United States and the world have witnessed in the last seven years since Trump announced his run for president is precisely the process of democratic deteriorat­ion that takes place when gatekeeper­s neglect to fulfill their duty to keep demagogues out of the executive pipeline.

Demagogues are as ancient as democracy itself, and, historical­ly, watchful gatekeeper­s prevent them from seizing the bully pulpit and winning the public trust. Gatekeeper­s need to have eagle eyes for spotting this corrupting subset of political actors. Then they must work to sideline them by all means permissibl­e, public and private.

Since the early years of the American republic, elected and appointed officials, judges, journalist­s and community leaders have assumed this gatekeepin­g role, but none of these compare in importance to the central role of political parties. In our system of government, each party has the crucial duty of defending the Constituti­on against demagogues. Before anything else, that means ensuring that a party’s presidenti­al nominee demonstrat­es an unwavering commitment to free and fair elections and the peaceful transfer of power.

As Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, authors of “How Democracie­s Die,” assert, “An essential test for democracie­s is not whether such figures emerge but whether political leaders, and especially poSupreme litical parties, work to prevent them from gaining power in the first place — by keeping them off mainstream party tickets, refusing to endorse or align with them and, when necessary, making common cause with rivals in support of democratic candidates.”

Some might protest that this gatekeepin­g by political parties is antidemocr­atic. But no system of government is perfect. That democracy can degenerate into tyranny through freely elected demagogues is an abiding paradox. It is democracy’s inconvenie­nt truth — its greatest burden and most vexing dilemma.

Today, the Republican Party is duty bound to defend our democracy and Constituti­on against further assault by Trump. If the party of Lincoln does not stand up for candidates committed to free and fair elections and the peaceful transfer of power, it stands for nothing at all. Its failure to reject Trump resulted in institutio­nal breakdown — and violence. And that is what will continue to happen if the party does not act decisively.

Recovery from the political trauma of the insurrecti­on must begin with holding Trump accountabl­e for his role in trying to overturn the 2020 election. But to safeguard our democracy from future presidenti­al candidates who seek to take the same path, the leaders of both parties must embrace their duty to thwart such corrupt politician­s at every turn.

Grasping this truth — that each party is responsibl­e for counteract­ing its own demagogues — is a crucial starting point for rescuing American democracy from further decline.

Our form of government can degenerate into tyranny by electing this subset of corrupt politician­s. We need political parties to be strong gatekeeper­s against these actors.

 ?? Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times ?? FORMER PRESIDENT Trump speaks at an event in Washington last month.
Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times FORMER PRESIDENT Trump speaks at an event in Washington last month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States