Los Angeles Times

Confusion, joy as asylum rule winds down

Immigrants are slowly being let into U.S. as Trump-era ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy ends.

- By Kate Morrissey Morrissey writes for the San Diego Union-Tribune.

SAN DIEGO — Moments after his immigratio­n case was heard last week, a 51year-old Cuban asylum seeker sat on a bench in the back of the courtroom and wept openly.

He had just learned that he would be allowed to fight his case from inside the United States instead of returning again to Tijuana under the “Remain in Mexico” program.

He’d been waiting more than two months in Tijuana for his immigratio­n court case under the program, known officially as Migrant Protection Protocols.

“In this moment, I am free,” he told the San Diego Union-Tribune in Spanish a few minutes after he was officially released from custody. “Before, I was not free.”

The man was among the first migrants released from MPP last week with the Biden administra­tion’s announceme­nt that the program was ending, after a lengthy legal battle in federal court. However, days later, most of those enrolled in the program are still waiting to be let into the United States.

The long-anticipate­d and yet abrupt end to the program meant confusion on the first days — not only for the migrants themselves but also for those who work in the program, including immigratio­n judges, private and government attorneys, and even the contracted guards who keep MPP enrollees in custody while they’re in U.S. immigratio­n court.

This marks the Biden administra­tion’s second attempt to end the Trump-created policy. After a campaign promise, President Biden early on in his term terminated the program. Then after a lawsuit in Texas, his administra­tion was ordered to reimplemen­t it. This second wind-down comes after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered in June that the administra­tion could end Remain in Mexico.

But the administra­tion didn’t act on the Supreme Court ruling until Aug. 8, when the district court that had initially ordered the program’s reimplemen­tation officially vacated its decision.

The Department of Homeland Security announced hours later that people would be unenrolled when they came onto U.S. soil for their next court hearings.

This process is different from the previous winddown, which involved coordinati­on among internatio­nal agencies and local nonprofits to bring dozens of asylum seekers into the U.S. each morning.

So far, one to three people per day have been taken out of the program in San Diego. At that pace, the winddown could take months to bring in the hundreds waiting in Tijuana.

In contrast, when the Biden administra­tion initially ended the program in 2021, 25 people were brought into the United States at the San Diego-Tijuana border just on the first day, according to Jewish Family Service, a local nonprofit that assisted in welcoming the asylum seekers onto U.S. soil.

Homeland Security did not respond to questions about the speed of the current process.

Immigratio­n officials responded to the arrival of Ukrainian asylum seekers at the border in the spring at a far faster rate.

In April, border officials in San Diego were able to receive more than 300 Ukrainian asylum seekers per day at the San Ysidro Port of Entry. If Homeland Security chose to move at a similar pace for the MPP winddown, all of those waiting in Tijuana for their next hearings could be inside the United States within a couple of days.

With little clarity about what the disenrollm­ent process would look like, last week’s announceme­nt left many in Tijuana anxious about whether they might end up in U.S. immigratio­n detention. Recently, that started happening to many people who were initially enrolled in the program but later passed screening interviews that found they were in danger in Mexico and should not be returned.

That question remained after the first day of postMPP hearings.

On Aug. 9, Michael Sullivan, an attorney representi­ng the U.S. government, told Immigratio­n Judge Catherine Halliday-Roberts that the two men before her would be disenrolle­d in the program and not returned to Tijuana. But he did not know whether they would be detained in long-term custody or released to their families.

An official with Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t, which makes immigratio­n custody determinat­ions, later confirmed that the two men were ultimately taken back to the port of entry and then released with electronic devices to monitor their locations within the U.S.

All of the other MPP enrollees who crossed the border last week ended up at the San Diego Rapid Response Network Migrant Shelter, where they were tested for COVID-19 before getting help traveling to their final destinatio­ns around the country.

Knowing that people so far are being released exacerbate­s the frustratio­n felt by former MPP enrollees who were able to get out of the program before its end, only to be detained by ICE.

Kirsten Zittlau, a San Diego attorney who has taken many MPP cases, said she’s getting calls from her detained clients who used to be in MPP asking how the end of the program affects them. It doesn’t, she tells them.

“It’s just a really raw deal for them,” she said. “It was just a matter of timing whether they were detained or let in. It’s just ridiculous.”

When asked about their situations, an ICE official said that the agency makes custody determinat­ions on a case-by-case basis.

But for people like the man from Cuba who are now finding themselves able to reunite with family already in the United States — in his case a U.S. citizen brother in Florida — the moment is lifechangi­ng.

The man is not being identified because of concerns about the safety of family still in his home country.

He was the only person who had an MPP hearing Aug. 10. Two guards stood watch as he listened intently to a court interprete­r who relayed the court proceeding­s to a headset that he wore.

Judge Halliday-Roberts asked ICE attorney Jennifer Woodmansee, who appeared along with the man’s attorney via video screen, what would happen to the man in light of the program’s end.

“He is not going to be detained, and he will not be removed to Mexico,” Woodmansee said, asking the court to transfer his case to Orlando, Fla., to be closer to his new home.

The man filled out his change-of-address form with his brother’s address from memory, though he pulled a crumpled piece of paper from his pocket to double-check once finished.

“Sir, I wish you well,” Halliday-Roberts told him. She asked if he had any final questions before the case adjourned for the day.

“No,” the man responded. “Only to say thank you for allowing me to enter into your country.”

The judge tried to explain that it hadn’t been her decision, but the man didn’t seem to care. He offered his thanks to everyone in the courtroom and on the video screen. Once the case was over, his attorney asked him to call as soon as he was able — his lawyer still didn’t know how or where he would be released.

When the man returned to a bench in the public seating area of the courtroom, his eyes were already red. He briefly removed his mask and sobbed before turning to apologize to the observers in the room.

Guards took the man to a small room and allowed staff members from Jewish Family Service, which operates the San Diego Rapid Response Network Migrant Shelter, to speak with him. While they were talking, a plaincloth­es ICE officer came out of the elevator, asked the man a couple of questions, and then told the guards they could leave. The man was no longer in their custody.

He was overwhelme­d — a mix of nervousnes­s, anxiety, excitement and joy, he said. He hadn’t known what to expect when he came to the border for court early that morning.

“They closed [MPP], but we never clearly knew anything,” the man said. “Today we’re learning the process.”

Now that he is free on U.S. soil, after one year, he will be able to apply for a green card through a special program only for people from Cuba. Then he will be able to sponsor his wife and children, whom he left behind.

“Knowing that I will be able to be here is huge,” he said. “It’s magnificen­t.”

 ?? Ana Ramirez San Diego Union-Tribune ?? ADAN, who left Nicaragua in hopes of seeking asylum in the U.S., leaves Tijuana last month for a van that would take him to San Diego’s immigratio­n court.
Ana Ramirez San Diego Union-Tribune ADAN, who left Nicaragua in hopes of seeking asylum in the U.S., leaves Tijuana last month for a van that would take him to San Diego’s immigratio­n court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States