Los Angeles Times

Alex Jones facing two more trials in Sandy Hook case

Jury in Connecticu­t to decide how much the conspiracy theorist must pay to families of slain schoolchil­dren.

- By Dave Collins Collins writes for the Associated Press.

HARTFORD, Conn. — A month after being ordered to pay nearly $50 million in one verdict, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is set to go on trial a second time for calling the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting a hoax and causing several of the victims’ families emotional and psychologi­cal harm.

A six-member jury with several alternates will begin hearing evidence Tuesday on how much Jones should pay the families, since he already has been found liable for damages to them. The trial is expected to last about four weeks.

Last month, a Texas jury ordered Jones to pay $49.3 million to the parents of 6-year-old Jesse Lewis, one of 26 students and teachers killed in the 2012 shooting in Newtown, Conn. Jones’ lawyer has said an appeal is planned.

The Connecticu­t case has the potential for a larger award because it involves three lawsuits (which have been consolidat­ed) filed by 15 plaintiffs, including the relatives of nine of the victims and a former FBI agent who responded to the school shooting.

Jones, who runs his web show and Infowars brand in Austin, Texas, faces a third trial in another pending lawsuit by Sandy Hook parents in Texas.

Here is a look at the upcoming trial in Waterbury, about 18 miles northeast of Newtown. Infowars’ parent company, Free Speech Systems, which has filed for bankruptcy protection, is also a defendant.

Why are the Sandy Hook families suing Jones?

The families and former FBI agent William Aldenberg say they have been confronted and harassed in person by Jones’ followers because of the hoax conspiracy. They also say they have endured death threats and been subjected to abusive comments on social media.

Some plaintiffs say strangers have recorded them and their surviving children. And some families have moved out of Newtown to avoid threats and harassment.

“I can’t even describe the last 91⁄2 years, the living hell that I and others have had to endure because of the recklessne­ss and negligence of Alex Jones,” Neil Heslin, Jesse Lewis’ father, testified during the Texas trial.

The Connecticu­t lawsuit alleges defamation, intentiona­l infliction of emotional distress and violations of the state Unfair Trade Practices Act. The families claim that when Jones talked about Sandy Hook on his show, he boosted his audience and raked in more profits from selling supplement­s and other items.

The families have not asked for any specific amount in damages, some of which may be limited by state laws. There are no damage limits, however, under the Unfair Trade Practices Act.

In all the Connecticu­t and Texas cases, Jones and his lawyers failed to turn over records as required to the families’ attorneys.

In response, judges handed down one of the harshest sanctions in the civil legal world — they found Jones liable for damages by default, without trials.

What does Jones say?

In a reversal from what he said on his show for years after the shooting, Jones now says he believes the massacre was real. But he continues to say his comments about the shooting — that it was a hoax involving crisis actors, to encourage gun control efforts — were protected by free speech rights.

During a deposition in the case in April, Jones said he wasn’t responsibl­e for the suffering that parents say they have endured because of his words. He also has said the judges’ default rulings against him were unfair and suggested they were part of a conspiracy to put him out of business and silence him.

“If questionin­g public events and free speech is banned because it might hurt somebody’s feelings, we are not in America anymore,” he said at the deposition. “They can change the channel. They can come out and say I’m wrong. They have free speech.”

At the Texas trial, however, Jones testified that he now realizes what he said was irresponsi­ble and hurt people’s feelings, and he apologized.

What is expected at the trial?

Judge Barbara Bellis, who found Jones liable for damages, will oversee the trial. She is the judge who oversaw Sandy Hook families’ lawsuit against Remington, which made the Bushmaster rifle used in the shooting. In February, Remington agreed to settle the lawsuit for $73 million.

The trial is expected to be similar to the one in Texas, with victims’ relatives testifying about the pain and anguish the hoax conspiracy caused them and medical profession­als answering questions about the relatives’ mental health and diagnoses.

Jones will be testifying, said his lawyer, Norman Pattis.

“He is looking forward to putting this trial behind him; it has been a long and costly distractio­n,” Pattis wrote in an email to the Associated Press.

Evidence about Jones’ finances is expected to be presented to the jury.

Jones testified at the Texas trial that any award exceeding $2 million would “sink us” and urged his web viewers to buy his merchandis­e to help keep him on the air and fight the lawsuits. But an economist testified that Jones and his company were worth up to $270 million.

Jones faces another lawsuit in Texas over accusation­s that he hid millions of dollars in assets after families of Sandy Hook victims began taking him to court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States