Isn’t this the Legislature’s job?

Re “Vote no on Propositions 26 and 27,” endorsement, Sept. 11

Why are Propositions 26 and 27, both of which have to do with sports betting, on the ballot at all this November?

Regardless of how we feel about the availability of gambling in California, both these ballot initiatives set up the potential for myriad collision courses — as described in your “no” endorsement for both of them — by asking voters to choose one, both or neither.

My vote personally will be no, but not because I disagree with everything the initiative backers are proposing. I plan to vote no because the numerous issues involved should be hashed out in the Legislature, not at the ballot box — and definitely not after being informed mostly by 30-second television spots. Joan Walston

Santa Monica

I appreciate the factbased assessment The Times gives to the propositions that will be voted on in November.

The contrast between The Times’ well-articulated editorial on Propositions 26 and 27 and the advertisements promoting these ballot measures is akin to the difference between a gift box filled with tasteful and thoughtful treats and a gift box containing an outdated lottery ticket.

The winning numbers in this instance are no votes on Propositions 26 and 27.

Ben Miles Huntington Beach