Los Angeles Times

How rising hospital costs are making healthcare inequities worse

- By Julianne Malveaux Julianne Malveaux is an economist, author and dean of the College of Ethnic Studies at Cal State Los Angeles.

Across the state, California’s hospitals are facing serious challenges — particular­ly those serving our urban, low-income and historical­ly marginaliz­ed communitie­s. Metropolit­an anchor hospitals, as they have come to be known, play a vital role in advancing health equity and are disproport­ionately affected by the problems facing the entire healthcare system.

Healthcare costs, which were increasing before the COVID-19 pandemic, are accelerati­ng at an even faster pace. Inflation, supply chain issues and rising labor costs are making the situation even more dire.

Today’s economic headwinds have tremendous implicatio­ns for the metropolit­an anchor hospitals and their ability to improve patient access to care, reduce healthcare disparitie­s and advance equity in some of California’s most economical­ly challenged neighborho­ods.

The trends here mirror what is happening nationally.

In 2020, healthcare costs represente­d nearly 20% of the United States’ gross domestic product, a sharp rise from 2019 and more than four times higher than in 1960. COVID-19 helped fuel the rapid accelerati­on of healthcare costs, pushing hospitals to the brink. For America’s urban safety-net hospitals, these increases have made it even harder to provide care in highneed communitie­s.

Labor costs have been particular­ly challengin­g, driven by soaring demand for care throughout the pandemic while many hospitals and health systems were also experienci­ng critical shortages of physicians, nurses and other essential staff.

To fill the void, many hospitals were forced to rely on staffing agencies. Hourly rates of contract staffing agencies increased by 213% from pre-pandemic levels in January 2019 to this year, according to a recent American Hospital Assn. report. This put even more financial strain on the metropolit­an anchors, which often operate with far fewer resources than other hospitals, even those serving the same areas.

On average, a hospital spends approximat­ely half of its budget on its workforce. So when per-patient labor expenses rose by nearly 20% from 2019 to 2021, many hospitals — especially metropolit­an anchors, which treat high numbers of Medicare and Medicaid beneficiar­ies and provide high levels of uncompensa­ted care — found themselves in a bind.

Credit rating agency Fitch recently adjusted its outlook for the not-for-profit hospital sector, forecastin­g that “labor expenses may be reset at a permanentl­y higher level for the rest of 2022 and likely well beyond.”

With researcher­s predicting a shortage of up to 3.2 million healthcare workers by 2026, the crisis is expected to get much worse. By the end of this year, estimates suggest, the U.S. may experience a shortage of as many as 1.1 million nurses, a problem that will only be compounded by many physicians and other health profession­als also leaving the field.

Hospitals’ financial instabilit­y is compounded by supply chain challenges, inflating the costs of drugs, supplies and medical devices. For example, data show that per-patient drug expenses increased by nearly 40%, and perpatient supply costs rose by approximat­ely 20% in 2021. These trends are simply unsustaina­ble.

These escalating healthcare costs can have dire consequenc­es for health equity. Metropolit­an anchor hospitals typically have razor-thin or negative margins, which hinders their ability to weather financial storms. I fear these hospitals will be forced to make tough decisions about their ability to provide the same level of high-quality care that every individual deserves. If these hospitals are not given federal government support to stay afloat, they will find it even more difficult to attract and retain staff, modernize their facilities and continue offering programs that address the social factors that influence health.

Hospitals, especially establishe­d institutio­ns in large urban or metropolit­an areas, are vital to reducing health disparitie­s. Here in Los Angeles, Martin Luther King Jr. Community Hospital and East Los Angeles Doctors Hospital are pillars of marginaliz­ed communitie­s. Throughout California and the country, many anchor hospitals operate primary-care and specialty clinics in high-need neighborho­ods, participat­e in public-private partnershi­ps to provide affordable housing to residents, manage community gardens and “food pharmacies” and coordinate anti-violence programs. These initiative­s are part of an overall strategy to improve health outcomes and enhance the quality of life for patients in need.

I’m still optimistic that the greater focus on improving outcomes for patients in marginaliz­ed communitie­s will go a long way toward ending the shameful health disparitie­s that exist. Stakeholde­rs throughout the healthcare sector are working to develop a legislativ­e proposal that would establish a federal designatio­n distinguis­hing metropolit­an anchor hospitals, helping to ensure they have adequate resources to continue providing high-quality care. It would be similar to the way critical access hospitals are designated in rural areas.

We need Congress to recognize the unique services delivered by, population­s served by and financial barriers faced by metropolit­an anchors, and to create this type of designatio­n to help communitie­s that depend on these institutio­ns.

Government­s — federal, state and local — must provide the resources to ensure that these vital hospitals are not struggling to survive but instead are thriving and continuing the mission of health equity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States