Los Angeles Times

Enough games. Migrants have a right to asylum

- By Karen Musalo Karen Musalo is a law professor and the founding director of the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies at UC Hastings College of the Law. She is also lead co-author of “Refugee Law and Policy: A Comparativ­e and Internatio­nal Approach.”

Pseemingly chaotic policy toward asylum seekers at the U.S. border is no accident. It’s carefully crafted to minimize political fallout. The administra­tion should keep it simple instead, by following the law and doing the right thing — admitting those who arrive at our borders seeking asylum.

Give voters a chance, Mr. President. The American people value decency. They don’t respect craven and calculated inconsiste­ncy.

This week, the Biden administra­tion announced an expansion of a Trump-era policy to turn away individual­s fleeing persecutio­n who reach our borders. This began with a pretext of limiting the spread of COVID-19, using a public health law known as Title 42. Now it’s just a sop to people who oppose immigratio­n.

Until the Trump administra­tion used Title 42 in this way, the nation had honored its obligation to asylum seekers for 40 years, under the 1980 Refugee Act. It grants the right to seek protection. Abrogating that right has resulted in the untold suffering, the return of refugees to persecutio­n and death, and chaos at the U.S.-Mexico border.

In April 2022, the Biden administra­tion stated its intent to end Title 42. Litigation delayed the terminatio­n, but in mid-November, a federal judge ruled the policy unlawful, and ordered it to end by Dec. 21. The Supreme Court has stayed that order until it hears arguments next month.

Now, in a head-spinning turn of events, Biden has announced the expansion of Title 42 to Haitians, Nicaraguan­s and Cubans — nationalit­ies that had not previously been subject to summary expulsion at the border.

If this were not enough of a contradict­ion, the administra­tion also plans to resurrect another Trumpera policy which Biden had previously denounced, the “transit ban.” This rule bars from asylum any migrants who do not apply for and receive a denial of asylum from the countries they pass through on their way to the U.S.

This “outsourcin­g” of our refugee obligation­s to countries of transit, which a federal court found unlawful when implemente­d by the Trump administra­tion, is ludicrous on its face. The asylum seekers pass through countries such as Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala, with human rights conditions as dire as in the migrants’ nations of origin.

To date, the only country with which we legally have such an arrangemen­t is Canada — which makes sense because it has a robust refugee protection system and an admirable human rights record. And even if there are other countries of transit, such as Costa Rica, that have a well-developed framework for the protection of refugees, and solid records on human rights, they are already taking in numbers of asylum seekers that far exceed their capacity.

At the same time as the Biden administra­tion rolls out plans for these and other anti-asylum policies, it has announced a number of laudable measures, two particular­ly worthy of mention.

First, the administra­tion will create a special “parole” program for Nicaraguan­s, Haitians and Cubans, similar to one created for Venezuelan­s. This program will allow the entry of up to 30,000 individual­s from the four countries each month — if they have a sponsor in the U.S. These individual­s will be permitted to remain for two years, with authorizat­ion to work.

Second, the administra­tion will increase to 20,000 from 15,000 the number of refugees from Latin America and the Caribbean whom it admits for resettleme­nt in fiscal years 2023 and 2024.

These are positive developmen­ts, but modest compared with the unlawful and punitive anti-immigrant measures in this package deal.

It is no secret that the Republican­s are highly motivated to make the border an issue. They will continue to do so, regardless of the reality. Rather than crack down on asylum seekers to woo the votes of anti-immigrant constituen­cies, Biden should uphold our legal obligation­s and make the case for why it is the right thing to do.

Doing so is the principled and moral path. It is also good politics. Polling consistent­ly shows strong support for protecting asylum seekers, across party lines. It is not too late for the administra­tion to change course, to uphold our national ideals, and to be an example to other nations around the world.

Biden will be criticized either way. He might as well be criticized for doing the right thing.

 ?? Dario Lopez-Mills Associated Press ?? MIGRANTS in Eagle Pass, Texas, after crossing the Rio Grande.
Dario Lopez-Mills Associated Press MIGRANTS in Eagle Pass, Texas, after crossing the Rio Grande.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States