Los Angeles Times

Oil firms challenge ban on drilling

- By Dakota Smith

An oil company with a drilling operation in Wilmington filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the city of Los Angeles over its a sweeping new law that will phase out oil production.

The lawsuit by Warren Resources, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, says the city failed to do a required environmen­tal study of the effects of stopping oil extraction.

The city’s ban will lead to more oil imports, causing increased emissions from trucks and oil tankers that arrive to the L.A. area, according to the lawsuit. The suit also questions the city’s analysis of the health impacts of conducting plugging and abandonmen­t operations.

Four other oil entities also sued the city over the ordinance Tuesday in a separate lawsuit.

The City Council last month moved to phase out all oil drilling in L.A., immediatel­y banning new oil and gas extraction and requiring that all existing oil and gas extraction­s stop production within 20 years. City leaders and activists celebrated the phase-out as a win for residents have suffered health issues associated with the wells.

Warren, which has a nearly 10-acre oil extraction site in Wilmington, asked the court to bar the city from enforcing the law and is seeking damages, according to its lawsuit. In a statement, the company said that the new law will “result in the complete shutdown of Warren.”

Ian Thompson, a spokespers­on for Los Angeles City Atty. Hydee Feldstein Soto, declined to comment on the lawsuit.

Warren’s L.A. site produces approximat­ely 1,800 barrels of oil a day, according to the company. The lawsuit says its operations are “100% electric” and the emissions “are the equivalent of a physically much smaller fastfood restaurant with a drive thru.”

“Warren Resources has spent millions to consolidat­e our operations into a single, all-electric location with an impeccable environmen­tal record,” James A. Watt, president and chief executive of Warren Resources, said in a statement.

The lawsuit contends the city’s actions violate the California Environmen­tal Quality Act, the city’s General Plan and the state and federal constituti­ons.

Stand Together Against Neighborho­od Drilling, or STAND-L.A., a group of community groups, helped rally support for the ordinance in recent years by highlighti­ng the low-income communitie­s of color that are particular­ly affected by L.A.’s wells.

Oil wells are known to emit likely carcinogen­s including benzene and formaldehy­de, and living near wells is linked to health problems including respirator­y issues and preterm births, studies have found.

Bahram Fazeli, director of research and policy at Communitie­s for a Better Environmen­t and a co-chair of STAND LA., said Warren has a “history of causing problems” in the neighborho­od.

“This is a baseless lawsuit to delay common sense protection for vulnerable communitie­s,” Fazeli said. “The city has the right to determine its land-use priorities and to make communitie­s whole and healthy.”

E&B Natural Resources Management Corp., Hillcrest Beverly Oil Corp., E&B ENR, and Elysium Natural Resources filed a similar lawsuit Tuesday seeking to vacate the city’s ban.

 ?? Christina House Los Angeles Times ?? A WOMAN passes a Warren facility in Wilmington in June. L.A. faces two lawsuits from five oil entities.
Christina House Los Angeles Times A WOMAN passes a Warren facility in Wilmington in June. L.A. faces two lawsuits from five oil entities.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States