Los Angeles Times

Post-Brexit push to shed EU laws makes headway

Prime minister’s plan to remove remaining legislatio­n advances in the British Parliament.

- Associated press

LONDON — First came Brexit. Now comes Britain’s bonfire of European laws.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is pushing ahead with a contentiou­s plan to remove all remaining European Union laws from Britain’s statute book by the end of 2023, despite opponents’ claims that the move is rash and unworkable.

Thousands of pieces of EU law were cut-and-pasted into U.K. legislatio­n when Britain left the bloc in 2020 after decades of membership, to ensure continuity for people and businesses. A bill debated Wednesday in Parliament would automatica­lly remove all of them at the end of the year unless they are explicitly replaced or retained. Financial services rules are exempt from the cull.

“I cannot stress enough the importance of achieving this deadline, the deadline of 2023,” Business Minister Nusrat Ghani told lawmakers in the House of Commons.

“Retained EU law was never intended to sit on the statute book indefinite­ly.”

Opponents argue that reviewing such a huge mass of law is a mammoth undertakin­g that will suck up the time of civil servants and lead to rules being rewritten without proper parliament­ary scrutiny.

Conservati­ve lawmaker David Davis, a firm supporter of Brexit, said Parliament was being asked “to sign a blank check, one might almost say a pig in a poke, because we do not know even how many pieces of legislatio­n are going through on the back of this, let alone what they are.”

“It’s not democratic, but it’s also going to be inefficien­t and possibly incompeten­t,” Davis said.

Critics also worry that safeguards for workers’ rights and environmen­tal standards will get eroded in the rush to discard the EU’s way of doing things.

Jo Pike, chief executive of the Scottish Wildlife Trust, said the bill would “wipe away decades of environmen­tal and other protection­s with potentiall­y farreachin­g unintended consequenc­es.”

Former Prime Minister Liz Truss introduced the bill during her ill-fated seven weeks in office last year. Sunak, her successor, decided to keep it despite calls from the opposition — and some within his governing Conservati­ve Party — to scrap the bill or move the end date to 2026.

Some Conservati­ve lawmakers want to amend the bill to give Parliament more explicit say over which laws are thrown out or amended.

Jill Rutter, a senior fellow at the Institute for Government think tank, said Sunak’s government appeared to hope that “this primal scream of legislatio­n will finally flush the missing Brexit dividends out from the cover of bureaucrat­ic inertia” and revive the British economy.

But, Rutter wrote in the Financial Times, it was “more likely to blow up in his government’s face than deliver noticeable benefits.”

The bill passed its final hurdle Wednesday in the House of Commons, where the Conservati­ves have a large majority. It was sent to the House of Lords for more scrutiny and likely opposition.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States