Los Angeles Times

4 Oath Keepers convicted on rare charge

Jury finds members of the far-right group guilty of seditious conspiracy in the Capitol attack.

- By Michael Kunzelman and Alanna Durkin Richer Kunzelman and Durkin Richer write for the Associated Press.

WASHINGTON — Four members of the Oath Keepers were convicted Monday of seditious conspiracy in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, in the second major trial of far-right extremists accused of plotting to forcibly keep President Trump in power.

The verdict against Joseph Hackett of Sarasota, Fla.; Roberto Minuta of Prosper, Texas; David Moerschel of Punta Gorda, Fla.; and Edward Vallejo of Phoenix came weeks after a jury convicted the group’s leader, Stewart Rhodes, in the mob’s attack.

It’s another victory for the Justice Department, which is also trying to secure sedition conviction­s against the former leader of the Proud Boys and four associates. The trial against Enrique Tarrio and his lieutenant­s opened this month in Washington and is expected to last several weeks.

The Washington jury in the Oath Keepers case deliberate­d for about 12 hours over three days before delivering the guilty verdict on the rarely used charge, which carries up to 20 years in prison. The four were also convicted of two other conspiracy charges, as well as obstructin­g an official proceeding: Congress’ certificat­ion of the 2020 presidenti­al election.

Minuta, Hackett and Moerschel were acquitted of lesser charges.

The judge didn’t immediatel­y set a date for sentencing and denied prosecutor­s’ bid to lock up the men while they await sentencing. The men were ordered to remain in home detention with electronic monitoring.

It was one of the most serious cases brought so far in the sweeping Jan. 6 investigat­ion, which continues to grow two years after the riot. The Justice Department has charged nearly 1,000 people for participat­ing in the riot, and the tally increases by the week.

Atty. Gen. Merrick Garland told reporters after the verdict that he is “grateful to the prosecutor­s, agents and staff for their outstandin­g work.”

Oath Keepers leader Rhodes and Florida chapter leader Kelly Meggs were convicted of seditious conspiracy in the previous trial, which ended in November. They were the first people in decades to be found guilty at trial of the Civil War-era charge. Three other Oath Keepers were cleared of the charge in that case but were found guilty of other serious crimes. All are awaiting sentencing.

Lawyers for Moerschel and Minuta suggested after the verdict that their clients were hurt by not being able to stand trial alongside Rhodes, as the judge split the case into two groups. Moerchel’s lawyer, Scott Weinberg, said he could have pointed to Rhodes as the “real bad guy.”

“I think it would be easier to be a low-level person in the same case as Stewart Rhodes, who is basically the figurehead of this organizati­on,” Weinberg said.

William Shipley Jr., Minuta’s attorney, said he was disappoint­ed and “somewhat puzzled” by the verdict. He said that the government’s witnesses didn’t stand up to scrutiny and that there were gaps in the evidence presented.

“We didn’t really think that in the 15 days of trial testimony, the government really had a good day,” Shipley said.

Vallejo left the courthouse without speaking to reporters.

Hackett’s attorney, Angela Halim, declined to comment after the verdict.

“We got a trial by residents of a small judicial district who in one way or another were almost all impacted by the events of Jan. 6,” Shipley said. “I think that raises some real troubling issues.”

Prosecutor­s told jurors that Rhodes and his band of extremists soon after the 2020 election began to prepare an armed rebellion to keep Trump in power. Messages show Rhodes and the Oath Keepers discussing the prospect of a “bloody” civil war and the need to keep Joe Biden, who won the election, out of the White House.

“Our democracy was under attack, but for the defendants, it was everything they trained for and a moment to celebrate,” prosecutor Louis Manzo told jurors in his closing argument.

Prosecutor­s alleged that the Oath Keepers amassed weapons and stashed them at a Virginia hotel for “quick reaction force” teams that could shuttle guns into Washington to support their plot if needed. The weapons were never used.

Defense attorneys sought to downplay violent messages as mere bluster and said the Oath Keepers came to Washington to provide security at events before the riot.

They seized on prosecutor­s’ lack of evidence that the Oath Keepers had an explicit plan to storm the Capitol before Jan. 6 and told jurors that the extremists who attacked the Capitol acted spontaneou­sly, like thousands of other rioters.

“They left evidence out, and they picked and chose what they wanted,” said Shipley.

Prosecutor­s argued that while there is not evidence spelling out a plan to attack the Capitol, the Oath Keepers saw the riot as a means to an end and sprung into action at an apparent opportunit­y to keep Trump in power.

Hackett, Moerschel and other Oath Keepers approached the Capitol in a military-style stack formation before entering the building, according to prosecutor­s. Minuta and his group from a second stack of Oath Keepers clashed with police after heeding Rhodes’ call to race to the Capitol, according to court documents.

Prosecutor­s said Vallejo, a U.S. Army veteran and Rhodes ally, drove from Arizona to prepare with the quick reaction force at the hotel outside Washington. Jurors heard an audio recording of Vallejo talking about a “declaratio­n of a guerrilla war” on the morning of Jan. 6.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States