Los Angeles Times

Palestinia­ns in Israel have new cause to fear

- By David N. Myers and Daniel Sokatch David N. Myers teaches Jewish history at UCLA and is the president of the New Israel Fund. Daniel Sokatch is the CEO of the New Israel Fund.

IN RECENT DAYS, there has been an alarming escalation of violence in Israel and Palestine, adding victims to what had been a deadly year in 2022. Last Thursday, the Israel Defense Force launched a raid against militants in the Jenin refugee camp, killing nine Palestinia­ns. The next day, a 21-year old Palestinia­n from East Jerusalem fired on Israeli Jews near a synagogue, murdering seven of them.

Barely a month into 2023, these two episodes mark — and have contribute­d to — a new cycle of violence. They also add to a deepening political crisis in Israel.

Every Saturday night, tens of thousands of Israelis of diverse political perspectiv­es have been gathering in Tel Aviv and other cities to protest the new far-right Netanyahu government, including the proposal to make the judiciary entirely subservien­t to the ruling political class.

Even more ominous is the threat that key members of the Netanyahu government are seeking a larger opportunit­y: to create a state where Palestinia­ns, who make up about 20% of the population of Israel, would no longer be welcome as its citizens. Sadly, the terror attack at the synagogue on Friday could further the resolve of those in positions of power today.

We have heard from Palestinia­n Israeli colleagues and friends about their fears of a second “Nakba,” referring to the forced expulsion and dispossess­ion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinia­ns from what is now Israel during the war of 1948. Many Palestinia­ns speak of an “ongoing Nakba” since 1948, by which they mean Israel’s mix of discrimina­tory policies toward Palestinia­n citizens, restrictio­ns on land possession and movement, and the 55-year old occupation of the West Bank.

But what we are hearing about now is something more dire, propelled by newly appointed government ministers such as Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, who have expressed a desire to see the land of Israel without Arabs.

This may seem to some to be an exaggerate­d fear. But Smotrich, now the finance minister, told Arab Israeli Knesset members in 2021 that they were “here by mistake because Ben Gurion didn’t finish the job and throw you out in 1948.” Ben-Gvir, for his part, is a disciple of the racist Israeli American rabbi, Meir Kahane, who called for strict segregatio­n between Jews and Arabs in Israel and depriving the latter of citizenshi­p rights. Ben-Gvir himself was convicted in 2007 of incitement against Arabs; more recently, he has spoken of the desire to encourage Arabs to leave the country and to expel undesirabl­es such as stone throwers and Palestinia­n Israeli members of the Knesset.

It is particular­ly alarming that Ben-Gvir has assumed the position of minister of National Security with control over the police and border patrol. Last week, he warned of the prospect of yet another Israeli military engagement in Gaza. In tandem, he has also revived the idea of creating a civilian guard to deal with social upheaval in Israel in its wake.

For Palestinia­n Israelis, the call to arm civilians and the specter of vigilantis­m are haunting reminders of the brutal intercommu­nal violence that broke out in May 2021 at the time of another Israeli military conflict with Hamas in Gaza. The difference now is that an extremist like BenGvir, with a track record of antiArab provocatio­n, controls the levers of law enforcemen­t.

There should be no mistake. Conditions of war, such as in a future Gaza conflict — or, for that matter, a wave of terror attacks even if perpetrate­d by Palestinia­ns from the West Bank rather than by citizens of Israel — provide cover and rationale for a population transfer.

We have seen this most recently in the deportatio­n of civilians from Ukraine and in migration from war-torn regions.

In the Israeli context, political leaders such as David BenGurion, Israel’s founding prime minister, had long imagined the transfer of local Arab residents as a policy option. They also saw the 1948 war as an opportunit­y to create as large a territory as possible for Jews — with as small an Arab population as possible. While they did not achieve their maximal territoria­l goals in 1948, the overwhelmi­ng majority of the local Palestinia­n population was encouraged or compelled to leave their land.

Palestinia­n Israelis live in fear of a repetition of this scenario today. What is perhaps most insidious is that this fear may already be doing the work of transfer. Palestinia­n Israelis have begun to seek foreign passports as well as business and educationa­l opportunit­ies abroad for themselves and their children. Families that have been on the soil of the Holy Land for centuries are considerin­g leaving.

Israel’s Declaratio­n of Independen­ce calls for “complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitant­s irrespecti­ve of religion, race or sex.” It is a moral and political imperative that all of us — and especially Jews who know well the pain of dispossess­ion — insist that the current government adhere to this core democratic principle and prevent any attempt by extremists to force Palestinia­n citizens of Israel from their homes and country.

Some in Netanyahu’s new regime aim to expel Arabs or, more insidiousl­y, to make life so miserable that many choose to leave.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States