Los Angeles Times

How cinema helped hold Nazis accountabl­e

- JUSTIN CHANG FILM CRITIC

In 1945, as Europe smoldered and the world waited for justice, American brothers and military veterans Budd and Stuart Schulberg embarked on the most difficult and important assignment of their lives.

Their mission, handed to them by the Office of Strategic Services, was to track down filmed evidence of German war atrocities, which would be used in the prosecutio­n of Nazi defendants at the Nuremberg trials.

Both would go on to careers in film and television — Budd as the Oscar-winning screenwrit­er of “On the Waterfront,” Stuart as a producer of news documentar­ies — but not until after gaining a rare firsthand understand­ing of cinema’s potential as an indictment of evil and an instrument of justice.

How they painstakin­gly gathered and compiled enough footage on a tight deadline is one of several stories amassed in the engrossing new documentar­y “Filmmakers for the Prosecutio­n.”

Directed by Jean-Christophe Klotz and adapted from a monograph by Stuart’s daughter, Sandra Schulberg, the movie is, like so many Nuremberg accounts, an alternatel­y thrilling and chastening portrait of accountabi­lity in action.

But it is also, as its title suggests, a thoughtful appraisal of the moral properties of the moving image. The guilty verdicts at Nuremberg were achieved, it reminds us, by way of a mountain of shocking and irrefutabl­e visual evidence, filmed by the Nazis themselves and brilliantl­y turned against them in a court of law.

Animated in its early stages by old TV interviews with Budd Schulberg (who died in 2009), the movie plays initially as a tribute to cando American spirit. The brothers got their orders from none other than director John Ford, then head of the OSS field photograph­ic unit and a major driver of the Hollywood war effort.

Budd attributes some of their footage-finding success to a fateful meeting with a Red Army captain who himself turned out to be a Ford super-fan and scholar. (That fleeting sense of kinship between American and Soviet veterans finds a sad counter-echo in the film’s later passages, which detail how a promising spirit of postwar internatio­nal collaborat­ion fell apart with the onset of the Cold War.)

Klotz absorbingl­y details the brothers’ race to salvage the incriminat­ing film caches before the Nazis could destroy them — a race that led to the arrest and detainment of several Third Reich propagandi­sts, including Leni Riefenstah­l, and at one point brought the Schulbergs into the depths of a German salt mine.

The footage itself, generously sampled across the documentar­y’s 58-minute running time, drew on everything from pogroms, book burnings and Hitler rallies to the concentrat­ion camps themselves. Chances are you’ve seen some of these images before, given how much of the visual record of the Holocaust can be traced back to the images — the primary sources — that the Schulbergs excavated and edited.

The particular power of “Filmmakers for the Prosecutio­n” is that it suggests what it must have been like to behold such images, in all their starkness and horror, for the first time. Its most gripping passages transport us to the Palace of Justice at Nuremberg as the trials get under way in September 1945, and the logistics of assembling and projecting the footage come into play.

The details and negotiatio­ns are utterly fascinatin­g: the highly meaningful decision to give the cinema screen pride of place in the courtroom, where the judge typically sits; the discreet positionin­g of cameras and light sources to document as much of the trial as possible; and the facial reactions of the defendants, among them infamous Nazi leaders like Hermann Göring and Rudolf Hess, upon being confronted with incontesta­ble evidence of their crimes.

The significan­ce of filmmaking at Nuremberg was at least twofold: There was the preexistin­g Nazi footage that had been compiled, and there were also the films — one American, one Soviet — shot during the trial itself.

“Filmmakers for the Prosecutio­n” details how the American project, directed by Stuart Schulberg and titled “Nuremberg: Its Lesson for Today,” was completed in 1948 but went unreleased for years. As political winds shifted and the Berlin Blockade began, a documentar­y about one of the last great examples of U.S.-Soviet cooperatio­n in action was determined not to be in the American public’s best interests.

The long-overdue 2010 release of “Nuremberg: Its Lesson for Today,” following a restoratio­n effort spearheade­d by Sandra Schulberg, went some distance toward correcting that oversight.

“Filmmakers for the Prosecutio­n” achieves its own highly specific resonance. Arriving at a moment when images of atrocities have become a matter of everyday institutio­nal record and public consumptio­n, it laments the barbarism we see in these images — and implicitly asks what it would take for them to shock and shame us anew.

 ?? Kino Lorber ?? HITLER’S photograph­er, Heinrich Hoffmann, center, inspects film as Stuart Schulberg, right, looks on in an image from “Filmmakers for the Prosecutio­n.”
Kino Lorber HITLER’S photograph­er, Heinrich Hoffmann, center, inspects film as Stuart Schulberg, right, looks on in an image from “Filmmakers for the Prosecutio­n.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States